A47 North Tuddenham to Easton

Relevant representations (registration comments)

Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.

Showing 1 to 84 of 84 representations, newest first.

Results per page View 25 results per page | View 50 results per page | 100

  • Graham Everett

    I am very supportive of this scheme as it will bring benefit to the areas to the west of Norwich.

  • Adrian Rutterford

    I have concerns regarding the access of properties in Lower Easton onto the new road. This will involve a long detour through narrow lanes.

  • Heather Brennecke

    As Berry's Lane, Honingham, is intended to be closed, the traffic from Barnham Broom and beyond wishing to join the A47 would cut through via Colton Road as the next available junction and would not... Read more

  • Weston Longville Parish Council (Weston Longville Parish Council)

    The final proposal has not adequately considered a coherent side road strategy, that keeps an equal distribution of traffic moving north – south across all the routes available across the Wensum... Read more

  • Catharine Hooker

    We have been assured on several occasions over the years that there was no intention to compulsory purchase any of the land surrounding [redacted] and suddenly we find that there is every intention of... Read more

  • David Hooker

    Recommendation that the Planning Inspectorate requires Highways England 1. To publish the detailed results of the Statutory Consultation. 2. To reassess and minimise the area of agricultural land... Read more

  • Alexander Barrett

    I have concerns about the traffic volumes on Taverham Road that will be generated by this scheme. I still have concerns over how well the main carriageway of the A47 will be shielded by trees from my... Read more

  • Ben Hooker

    We have been assured on several occasions over the years that there was no intention to compulsory purchase any of the land surrounding [redacted] and the [redacted] Barn complex and suddenly we find... Read more

  • Mr Joshua Hooker

    I am somewhat perplexed as to why there suddenly seems to be a compulsory land purchase order for [redacted] gardens and how this has mysteriously been added with no warning whatsoever. I am now... Read more

  • D G M Kenney

    HE's proposal to close the Ringland Road connection to the A47 at Easton will result in the present rat-run traffic from the north (Taverham etc) being redirected westwards, down Weston Road (single... Read more

  • Peter Milliken

    I would like to make representation in support of this application. At present there is no safe way to get to a part of our village on foot or by cycle which limited the travel options of this part of... Read more

  • Wensum Valley Alliance (Wensum Valley Alliance)

    The WVA (Wensum Valley Alliance) is concerned about the Road Building proposals for the County generally, but particularly for the impact upon the Chalk streams and river environments on the grounds... Read more

  • Bryan Robinson

    HE comments to Norfolk County Council on the NWL Scoping application stated that until such time as the A47 DCO is approved and delivery confirmed, the impact of and mitigation for the NWL should be... Read more

  • Transport Planning Associates (Transport Planning Associates) on behalf of Clarion Housing Group (Clarion Housing Group)

    We wish to make additional representations to those already made in relation to the A47 road improvements consultation, on behalf of our clients, Clarion Housing Group. In making these further... Read more

  • David Lewis

    Subject: Closure of Church Lane, Lower Easton Dear James and the Highways team, I wish to express my gratitude to you for producing the planned changes to the road system in Lower Easton, as well as... Read more

  • Childhood First (Childhood First)

    We wish to make a representation to confirm the arrangements we made with Highways England who have altered their plans to prevent disruption to one of our children's homes which is adjacent to the... Read more

  • CPRE Norfolk (CPRE Norfolk)

    CPRE Norfolk does not agree with the need for an optional arm at the proposed Wood Lane Junction Northern Dumbbell roundabout and therefore that part of the junction needs to be redesigned. This is... Read more

  • Edward Bown

    - concern about the NMU link between Hockering and Mattishall - concern about the lack of noise barrier between Hockering and the new road. speeds on the new road will be higher, there will be a lot... Read more

  • Howard James Rees

    This scheme is not consistent with the UK's commitments under the Paris Agreement. It also falls foul of many areas of Government commitments, policy and legislation regarding limits on greenhouse gas... Read more

  • John Cummings

    The Supreme Court has ruled that developments must accord with government commitments under the Paris Accord (which will include current G7 and CoP26 commitments. This means that Road traffic must be... Read more

  • Easton Parish Council (Easton Parish Council)

    On behalf of Easton Parish Council as chairman representing the unanimous support of the Parish Council members at a meeting of the council on the 27th May 2021, I make representation in support of... Read more

  • Brown & Co (Brown & Co) on behalf of A L Alston & Sons Ltd (A L Alston & Sons Ltd)

    We wish to make representations on behalf of A L Alston & Sons Ltd concerning the configuration of the proposed grade separate junction at Wood Lane. We have been engaged with Highways England at all... Read more

  • Brown & Co (Brown & Co) on behalf of Honingham Aktieselskab (Honingham Aktieselskab)

    We have received limited feedback on requests although 12 months or so ago, there were numerous meetings to discuss the scheme. The Farm is large and private and the owners would like it to remain so.... Read more

  • Lesley Grahame

    A. Increasing road capacity increases traffic, and fails to support the aspiration to shift travel mode from car to active travel B. Committing to new roads without knowing how our post-covid travel... Read more

  • Nick Bishop-Clark

    I object to the proposed scheme for these reasons: A. The case for the scheme (at 3.5.1) says that it will increase capacity which means that it will increase traffic growth in Norwich area. This does... Read more

  • Olivia Hanks

    I am concerned that this scheme is being considered in isolation and that the application does not consider the relationship with other road infrastructure projects, in particular the proposed Norwich... Read more

  • Roc Sandford

    This project is inconsistent with national planning policies and the Paris agreement calling for a shift to low carbon transport modes.

  • Anne Robinson

    I object to the proposed scheme for the following reasons: 1. The case for the scheme (at 3.5.1) says that it will increase capacity. New roads generate new traffic by up to 47% increases, as... Read more

  • Deepak Rughani

    I object to the proposed scheme for these reasons: A. The case for the scheme (at 3.5.1) says that it will increase capacity which means that it will increase traffic growth in Norwich area. This does... Read more

  • Dr Larch Maxey

    I object to this proposed road scheme for these reasons: A. As someone who has researched, practiced and taught transport policy and planning since 1993 it is clear that this scheme will lead to more... Read more

  • Dr Matt Tomlinson

    I wish to raise environmental points related to climate change and increasing road capacity. The impact this dual carriageway has on the local wildlife and on the wider impact via co2 driven climate... Read more

  • Edward Kevin OHara

    I am concerned that most (if not all) examinations as to where we go with transport in the immediate future do not take account of the imminent full self-driving technologies expected to break over... Read more

  • Emma Tristram

    I object to the proposed scheme for these reasons: A. The case for the scheme (at 3.5.1) says that it will increase capacity which means that it will increase traffic growth. ''If road capacity... Read more

  • Joe McCarney

    I object to the proposed scheme for these reasons: A. The case for the scheme (at 3.5.1) says that it will increase capacity which means that it will increase traffic growth in Norwich area. This does... Read more

  • John Greenaway

    The long-term effects of Covid -19 on such things as home working will reduce the need for more road capacity and this needs to be taken into account at the inquiry. The proposed road scheme seems to... Read more

  • Mireille Heald

    I object to the proposed scheme for these reasons: A. The case for the scheme (at 3.5.1) says that it will increase capacity which means that it will increase traffic growth in Norwich area. This does... Read more

  • Norfolk County Council (Norfolk County Council)

    While the County Council has long supported the principle of full dualling of the A47 – and this proposal is consistent with that objective – there are a number of detailed issues in respect of,... Read more

  • Norwich Green Party Group of City and County Councillors (Norwich Green Party Group of City and County Councillors)

    Norwich and Norfolk Green Party councillors (twelve councillors) object: Scheme is over-engineered at considerable loss to the local and global environment. AADT flows in base scenario are modest... Read more

  • Ringland Parish Council (Ringland Parish Council)

    The A47 project involves the removal of the existing roundabout at Easton and as a consequence effectively closes one of the three current routes for light traffic to cross the Wensum valley. Traffic... Read more

  • Adrian Holmes

    I object to the proposed scheme for these reasons: The case for the scheme (at 3.5.1) says that it will increase capacity which means that it will increase traffic growth in Norwich area. This does... Read more

  • Broadland District Council (Broadland District Council)

    This letter sets out Broadland District Council’s Relevant Representation in respect of the application made by Highways England for a Development Consent Order for alterations to a section of the A47... Read more

  • Glebe House

    I believe a review of the road development needs to take place given the change in road use as a result of the Covid 19 pandemic. The development is based on our of date information. My strong view is... Read more

  • Hannah Hoechner

    I object to the proposed scheme for the following reasons: A. The case for the scheme (at 3.5.1) says that it will increase capacity which means that it will increase traffic growth in Norwich area.... Read more

  • Hanne Lene Schierff

    I object to the proposed scheme for these reasons: The case for the scheme (at 3.5.1) says that it will increase capacity which means that it will increase traffic growth in Norwich area. This does... Read more

  • Historic England (Historic England)

    Historic England (retaining the formal title of the Historic Buildings and Monuments Commission for England) is the government service championing England’s heritage and giving expert, constructive... Read more

  • Honingham Parish Council (Honingham Parish Council)

    The Parish of Honingham sits directly on the route of the proposed dualled A47. The Council has had significant involvement during the initial stages, consulting regularly with Highways England about... Read more

  • Jonathan Maynard

    I strongly object to the proposed A47 Tuddenham to Easton scheme. This is contrary to a move towards greener transport and we should be looking at ways to reduce our car usage.

  • Laura Blake

    I have concerns over the impact of this project if it goes ahead. I do not believe that it would comply with the Government's legal committments to Carbon Net Zero by 2050. The traffic modelling is... Read more

  • Mattishall Parish Council (Mattishall Parish Council)

    The following represent the concerns of Mattishall Parish Council. A concern that the spill over of traffic issues resulting from the proposed junctions on the new A47 dual carriageway. In particular... Read more

  • David Hooker on behalf of Mrs Anne Gowing (Mrs Anne Gowing)

    My family's house and land are on the route of the proposed dualled A47. We have had numerous meetings with Highways England to discuss their proposals and suggestions. We have made every effort to... Read more

  • Norfolk Barbastelle Study Group (Norfolk Barbastelle Study Group)

    We are concerned that the Ecological Assessment of the proposed scheme does not adequately consider the short and long-term impacts on the nationally important colony of Western Barbastelle... Read more

  • North Tuddenham Parish Council (North Tuddenham Parish Council)

    Generally, the route met with approval of North Tuddenham PC as it will meet the key objectives of providing a safer and faster route into Norwich and beyond. The complex road interchanges at Wood... Read more

  • Norwich & Norfolk Friends of the Earth (Norwich & Norfolk Friends of the Earth)

    I am extremely concerned about the environmental impact of building new roads in general and the A47 North Tuddenham-Easton in particular This is because the dualling of this road is very much part of... Read more

  • Patricia Day

    I am very concerned by the impact on local wildlife and their unique and specific habitats as yet another new structure encroaches on mature countryside. The increase of capacity anticipated by the... Read more

  • Richard Hawker

    Please can the following topics be explored in the examination. 1) Procedural - initial consultation was late and poor. Early offer to co-operate was declined. Only four options for the route.... Read more

  • Robert Palgrave

    I object to the proposed scheme for these reasons: A. The case for the scheme (at 3.5.1) says that it will increase capacity which means that it will increase traffic growth in Norwich area. This does... Read more

  • South Norfolk Council (South Norfolk Council)

    This letter sets out South Norfolk Council’s Relevant Representation in respect of the application made by Highways England for a Development Consent Order for alterations to a section of the A47... Read more

  • Wild Wings Ecology (Wild Wings Ecology)

    The proposed scheme is located within the 6km radius Core Sustenance Zone of a nationally important 'super-colony' of a very rare Annex II bat species, the western barbastelle (Barbastella... Read more

  • Brown & Co (Brown & Co) on behalf of Alston Farms Ltd (Alston Farms Ltd)

    Respondant: James Alston Submission is made on behalf of James Alston as shareholder and director of Alston Farms Ltd, parent company of Ebony Holdings Ltd as owner of the property known as [redacted]... Read more

  • Alyson Lee

    I would like to register as an interested party for the following reasons:- 1. All new roads mean increased traffic and therefore increased air pollution and carbon emissions. We are in a climate... Read more

  • Savills UK Ltd (Savills UK Ltd) on behalf of Anthony Meynell (Anthony Meynell)

    INTRODUCTION 1. This relevant representation is made on behalf of Mr Anthony Meynell (‘the Owner’), in respect of the application made by Highways England (‘the Applicant’) for development consent for... Read more

  • Breckland Council (Breckland Council)

    Breckland Council, as the host authority for the proposals, has been in discussions with Highways England for some time in relation to the proposed scheme. It welcomes the chance to be an active part... Read more

  • Christine Way

    I object to the proposed scheme for these reasons: A. Increasing capacity means an increase in traffic growth in the Norwich area which is contrary to the national policies for climate change and a... Read more

  • Climate Emergency Planning and Policy CEPP (Climate Emergency Planning and Policy CEPP)

    Dr Andrew Boswell, Climate Emergency Planning and Policy As an independent environmental consultant specialising in science, policy, and law, I object to the A47NTE scheme for these reasons: A. In... Read more

  • David Morton

    Dear Sirs, My representation is that I oppose this scheme, primarily because of the increase in greenhouse gases that would entail not only due to its construction, but the inevitable increase in road... Read more

  • Environment Agency (Environment Agency)

    APPLICATION BY HIGHWAYS ENGLAND FOR AN ORDER GRANTING DEVELOPMENT CONSENT FOR THE A47 NORTH TUDDENHAM TO EASTON PROJECT Please find below our relevant representation for the A47 North Tuddenham to... Read more

  • Brown & Co (Brown & Co) on behalf of Food Enterprise Park Ltd (Food Enterprise Park Ltd)

    Respondent: Food Enterprise Park (FEP) – James Alston as named partyif required FEP are owners and developers of land North of Church Lane, Easton where this an existing LDO for current and future... Read more

  • Gil Murray

    I object to the proposed scheme for these reasons: A.     The traffic and economic modelling uses data, assumptions and projections from before the Covid 19 pandemic.  Recent and future levels of... Read more

  • Hockering Parish Council (Hockering Parish Council)

    1. TO CONGRATULATE HIGHWAYS ENGLAND UPON THEIR WORK TO DATE ESPECIALLY THEIR ATTENTION TO OUR PREVIOUS MATTISHALL LANE CONCERNS. 2. TO SEEK REASSURANCE ON POSSIBLE CONTAMINATION TO THE RIVER TUD. 3.... Read more

  • James Brown

    I am a resident of Hockering. I expect my representation to cover the following points. I intend to comment positively on the provision for cycle lanes although I will examine the proposal carefully... Read more

  • Jamie Osborn

    Councillor Jamie Osborn, Green Party I am a Norwich City councillor and Norfolk County councillor. This submission is made independently as my personal submission, and is separate to the Green Party... Read more

  • Jean Bishop

    I am opposed to the proposed scheme as I feel it will have a disasterous impact on the very sensitive Wensum Valley, causing fragmentation, loss or displacement of dimminishing wildlife habitats. Also... Read more

  • Mair Bain

    I object to this scheme because... Road traffic numbers must reduce if the UK is to met legally binding carbon emissions targets. This scheme will increase capacity and increase emissions. Carbon... Read more

  • Brown & Co (Brown & Co) on behalf of Mr Neil Alston (Mr Neil Alston)

    Respondent: Mr Neil Alston Property: Land at East Tuddenham The total Property owned by the Respondent extends to approximately 518ha (1230 acres) of what is primarily productive arable land,... Read more

  • National Grid Gas plc (National Grid Gas plc )

    Submission Withdrawn by letter dated 10 February 2022 [REP10-011] Dear Sir/Madam REPRESENTATION BY NATIONAL GRID GAS PLC (“NGG”) TO THE A47 NORTH TUDDENHAM TO EASTON (“THE PROJECT”) NGG wishes to make... Read more

  • Norfolk Constabulary (Norfolk Constabulary)

    I am the Traffic Management Officer for Norfolk Constabulary and in this respect I am keen to ensure that the roads of Norfolk are made as safe as possible for all road users. This includes improved... Read more

  • Pinsent Masons (Pinsent Masons) on behalf of Norfolk County Council as promoter of Norwich Western Link (Norfolk County Council as promoter of Norwich Western Link )

    This representation is submitted for Norfolk County Council in its capacity as the local highway authority promoting the proposed Norwich Western Link (“NWL scheme”), which is intended to connect to... Read more

  • Orsted Hornsea Project Three UK (Orsted Hornsea Project Three UK)

    This relevant representation is made by Orsted Hornsea Project Three (UK) Limited (“Hornsea Three”) the named undertaker on the Development Consent Order (DCO) for the Hornsea Three Offshore Wind Farm... Read more

  • Public Health England (Public Health England)

    Thank you for your consultation regarding the above development. Public Health England (PHE) welcomes the opportunity to comment on your proposals at this stage of the project. The modelling reported... Read more

  • Steve Hale

    I object to the proposed scheme for these reasons: A. The case for the scheme (at 3.5.1) says that it will increase capacity which means that it will increase traffic growth in Norwich area. This does... Read more

  • David Pett on behalf of Stop Wensum Link (Stop Wensum Link)

    Submissions in relation to the proposed construction of A47 North Tuddenham to Easton (‘Proposed development’) I am a solicitor and a member of the steering committee of the Stop Wensum Link (’SWL’)... Read more

  • Transport Action Network (Transport Action Network)

    Transport Action Network wishes to register an OBJECTION to the proposed scheme on the following grounds: 1. Climate change and increased traffic 2. Cumulative effect of this scheme with other... Read more

  • Vattenfall Wind Power Ltd (Vattenfall Wind Power Ltd)

    Vattenfall Wind Power Limited (VWPL) welcomes the chance to respond to Highways England’s (HE) A47 North Tuddenham to Easton application. VWPL is currently developing the Norfolk Vanguard and Norfolk... Read more

  • Victoria Rance

    I object to the proposed scheme for these reasons: A. The case for the scheme (at 3.5.1) says that it will increase capacity which means that it will increase traffic growth in Norwich area. This does... Read more