Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.
-
I am totally against this expansion and any expansion to increase the number of flights into and from Gatwick. This is for climate reasons. We need to be reducing the number of flights not increasing...
Read more
-
I oppose this project to create a new second runway on multiple grounds: 1. There is only one runway currently this is an attempt to get a new second runway via the back door 2. Doubling the number of...
Read more
-
I'm 2miles off the flight path and have noticed a massive increase in flight movement with it's associated noise and air pollution. There has also been an increase in parking and traffic problems. All...
Read more
-
Live under the flightpaths, Route 3 and 4. Suffer day to day noise due to operations at the Airport. Concerns about more noise during the day. Concerns about potential for more night flights and...
Read more
-
To bring the second runway at Gatwick into mainstream use would be a significant mistake, because of the following impacts: - It would have a considerably negative impact on progress towards net zero...
Read more
-
Using the emergency northern runway as a regular runway will increase its use significantly. The approach and departure from this runway will obviously be further north and will depart after takeoff...
Read more
-
We are concerned about the amount of increased noise pollution, both air and traffic, that the extra runway will cause. We are also concerned about the impact on the local wildlife and the natural...
Read more
-
Having lived in Dorking for 45 years I have seen a manifold increase in air traffic as well re-routing of flight paths from both Heathrow and Gatwick. At times, flights are barely at 1 minute...
Read more
-
I oppose the project because of the adverse impact it will have on residents, particularly in West Sussex and Surrey. The negatives are many and include the major increase in aircraft movements and...
Read more
-
No issue - flight path does not effect East Grinstead. Heathrow cause more noise. Local area will benefit from skilled work creation.
-
Rural Roads are already under pressure and it will become worse from Gatwick Airport New Northern Runway which proposes doubling the amount of passenger traffic yearly from 45 million to 90 million....
Read more
-
The vast increase in the number of flights will have a catastrophic impact on the local area in terms of noise pollution and environmental pollution. No amount of 'measures' by the airport can...
Read more
-
I object to the proposals because of the likely detrimental impact on carbon dioxide emissions, increase in local noise levels and health problems, and the increased strain on local and regional...
Read more
-
I do not want Gatwick to expand. I believe it will create greater pollution including poorer air quality and greatly increased traffic on already congested local roads. I believe we have a moral...
Read more
-
I am extremely concerned about the impact of additional traffic on and around the roads that we live which already have high levels of traffic to and from Gatwick Airport. The roads do not have the...
Read more
-
Why are Gatwick looking to expand the airport when we are being told we need less travel not more to meet climate targets. The effects of an extra runway doubles capacity and is not a sustainable...
Read more
-
The government spent a long time carrying out a consultation to decide whether Heathrow or Gatwick should have a second runway. They decided it should be Heathrow. Gatwick are now trying to get a...
Read more
-
Increased noise from the extra flights that the new runway will allow.
-
Gatwick recently leafleted everyone in our road claiming that the proposed development at Gatwick will be good for everyone. This is clearly very far from the truth. Not only is there the increase in...
Read more
-
Increased flights goes against net zero commitments by the Govt. The developers are only committing to net zero for emissions within their control. This ignores the emissions of the aircraft. The...
Read more
-
I object. We should not be expanding air travel when we are already seeing the effects of the climate emergency with record world temperatures and record wild fires.
-
Our concerns are we live within the flightpath vicinity of LGW and flights do pass over our house. We are also affected by LHR. We have major concerns about noise
-
Arqiva Limited operate broadcast infrastructure throughout the UK that provides television and DAB radio signal. In order to provide this public service, Arqiva operate a network of broadcast...
Read more
-
I wish to register my opposition to the Northern Runway Project due to increase in noise and frequency of flights which have already gone beyond acceptable levels - especially overnight. Additionally...
Read more
-
Against this expansion as we are already badly effected by low flying flights to Gatwick. Environmental negative impacts are blindingly obvious.