Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.
-
I do not want a second runway at Gatwick. We have enough housing, roads and employment. We have no space for new housing unless we start eating up into the green belt and that should be safe guarded...
Read more
-
As an employer at Gatwick albeit a small business we are not for this project. The chaos this would cause would impact on the already creaking operation. Businesses can not as it is recruit and retain...
Read more
-
I’m against the proposed development: Negative impact of noise of new runway and increased noise pollution from additional flights Increase in greenhouse gases from additional flights Negative impact-...
Read more
-
The dynamics of the UK economy keeps changing and every now and again the infrastructure need to be changed accordingly.The UK is a major player in regional and international economy, so if the...
Read more
-
This massive airport expansion will come at a huge carbon cost, from its construction, from the increase in flights and from increased travel to access the airport. Currently there are no low carbon...
Read more
-
I am concerned that the proposed expansion of Gatwick airport will have an unfair detrimental impact of residents in Kent and East Sussex from increased, and more intense aircraft noise.
-
It allows improvements to our airfield, terminal facilities and access arrangements into the airport.
-
Extra noise, pollution, traffic, road congestion, demand for housing for airport workers of all grades will occur. How will the local infrastructure cope, and who will pay the extra costs? Some...
Read more
-
No airport should be expanded whilst aircraft are reliant on fossil fuels - the climate emergency demands this. An expansion of Gatwick will increase noise pollution over East Grinstead and exacerbate...
Read more
-
I support the use of the runway in line with existing restrictions that apply to the main runway.
-
Will bring more jobs to crawley
-
I don’t think increasing pollution is the right way to deal with the climate emergency. This is absolutely not where our priorities should be.
-
Additional airport capacity would be incompatible with net zero targets and would help increase carbon dioxide emissions.
-
If the airport is to grow. It needs to start using this existing second runway at the very least on a temporary basis to check out any safety implications.
-
This is a brilliant idea to convert the northern runway, Gatwick Airport is the main say for a lot of the local residents and having this application submitted and approved will only help with more...
Read more
-
I travel frequently and live in the area more routes and job security for the local community is essential
-
I would like to support the construction of a second runway at Gatwick Airport. I believe it is extremely important that the airtraffic is eased up by increasing the landing and takeoff capacity of...
Read more
-
Pollution, Noise, Greenhouse Gases, Infrastructure Demand, Traffic Congestion, Plastics. No thanks.
-
Don't believe this is a good option, it'll increase the number of flights, which in turn will increase pressure on local infrastructure and have a detrimental affect on wildlife. It'll also have a...
Read more
-
I can not put it better than the paragraphs I have copied and pasted below regarding my objections to Gatwick Airport runway plans. It’s the same ‘profit at all costs’ approach this country suffers...
Read more
-
The benefits of allowing London Gatwick Airport to expand using their existing infrastructure options are as follows: 1. Access to the airport is excellent via train, road and bus. No upgrades are...
Read more
-
I approve. Increasing Gatwick is essential.
-
Brillant
-
I live in this area and love this area. I feel that anymore air and noise pollution which will be caused by the use of this runway could lead to a drastic decrease in my lifestyle and could...
Read more
-
Gatwick needs more capacity to reduce aircraft holding to reduce carbon
-
Worried about noise increase over our property because of increased number of flights Negative impact on property value as current flights are audible inside and in garden but less consistent at the...
Read more
-
Good idea
-
I want to register my interest because I was born in Crawley and 10 of those years I spent being a homeowner in Langley Green very close to the current runway. I'm (redacted) so is my Daughter, when...
Read more
-
The use of the safety runway is not an acceptable option. 1) it is there to be used in emergency and if being used regularly will not so easily be accessed in an emergency 2) the original application...
Read more
-
I oppose this Gatwick Airport application for a northern runway because it is a new runway – Policy has been misinterpreted by the applicant as this is an applicant for a new runway which does not...
Read more
-
Increased noise. Increased noise at night and early mornings. Concentrated flight paths. Increased pollution. Crawley / Copthorne has a very high level. Road infrastructure needs expanding urgently:...
Read more
-
I am not in favour of the 2nd runway as a result of the increased air and noise pollution in the local area.
-
I object strongly to this proposal because of the effect on UKs contribution to the climate crisis. The increase in flights will have huge impact on noise pollution, large increase in greenhouse gases...
Read more
-
Nothing has changed since Gatwick was turned down in favour of Heathrow expansion by the Airport Commission in 2015. Gatwick sits on a single arterial road (M23) and a single railway line that can’t...
Read more
-
Positive for the area with minimal cost and disturbances
-
night flights noise polution airspace and flight paths hammering specific areas not broadly distributed Reconfiguring, moving, significantly increasing size, altering other access and taxiways is not...
Read more
-
Please allow the use of the additional runway it will be amazing for the local area, more investment more jobs more of everything good
-
Proposed project would be a good idea and create additional jobs at Gatwick and the local community
-
I’m concerned about the environmental impacts and damage of this project.
-
Use the Northern Runway to minimise unnecessary disruption
-
A second runway at Gatwick will increase air and noise pollution in the local area and will be detrimental to a net zero policy
-
I am concern about the increase of carbon emission and of the air and noise pollution this extension will cause. I am questioning the need of increasing airports capacity in the context of the climate...
Read more
-
The main issue is, given that more air travel capacity is needed for south east England, where is the most suitable location. Heathrow is certainly not a good location - for two main reasons: first,...
Read more
-
In general happy for use of the additional runway. Some environmental concerns. Noise pollution and air pollution with the inevitable increase in flights Good opportunity for jobs in the area will...
Read more
-
Infrastructure for additional traffic is not in place. Already have huge queues to cross at Dartford and the Blackwall Tunnel. Flight pass expansion and rerouting also detrimental.
-
The already increased fumes and noise will get even worse and make using outside spaces virtually impossible for any form of socialisation. The increased traffic on the local small country lanes used...
Read more
-
I fully support the project to increase Gatwick’s capacity and boost the local economy
-
Gatwick Airport needs a second run way. It will be good for local area, jobs and the economy.
-
I am concerned about the increasing amount of noise from not only more flights, but also aircraft waiting for take-off, more traffic and illegally parked taxis. I am concerned about the increasing...
Read more
-
I support the extension at Gatwick. West Sussex and local area really needs more work opportunities for local people in skilled and semiskilled professions.