Skip to main content
Find a National Infrastructure Project

This is a beta service - your feedback will help us to improve it


Filter

Gatwick Airport Northern Runway

Relevant representations (registration comments)

Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.

Showing 4701 to 4725 of 4813 representations, newest first.

Results per page 25 | View 50 results per page | View 100 results per page

  • Kerry Anne Harris

    The 2nd runway will have a direct impact on our day to day living. A lot more noise and air pollution and a reduction in the value of our property.

  • Linda Jane Glynn

    Gatwick airport is big enough. One can’t help but think that Gatwick sets out to deceive when documents put out for public consultation are unclear, blurry, so making it difficult to know how exactly... Read more

  • Chris Welch

    Increased noise Increase aircraft movement and increased pollution Night flights - over the last 20 odd years these have already significantly increased Detrimental effect to house prices in the area... Read more

  • Christina Koutsavakis

    more noise and more pollutions

  • Christopher Fields

    I work for Gatwick Airport Ltd and see the tremendous opportunity this has to grow jobs and income for the local economy as well as bringing more competition to the aviation market.

  • David Cregeen

    This seems like a pragmatic way to provide a required increase in airport capacity without significantly increasing the airport's footprint and with consideration to local road infrastructure. However... Read more

  • Ian Harrison

    Massively for Gatwick utilising its current runway and for moving its centre line to accommodate more passengers and aircraft to use it. It will be hugely profitable for not only Gatwick Airport but... Read more

  • John Sutton

    iNCREASED NOISE, POLLUTION, TRAFFIC CONGESTION AND ENVIRONMENTAL DAMAGE

  • National Air Traffic Services Ltd (National Air Traffic Services Ltd)

    NATS En-Route wishes to register as an Interested Party. It will submit a formal representation in due time.

  • Paul Costello

    Residential property owners of (redacted) which is located adjacent to the northern perimeter road. As this property is one of the closest if not the closest residential property to the north terminal... Read more

  • Rai Bhanot

    Born and raised in (redacted), I have witnessed first-hand the detrimental impact of the pandemic on both the local economy and the environment surrounding Gatwick. For nearly 15 years, I dedicated... Read more

  • RGC - Regency Grove Communications Ltd (RGC - Regency Grove Communications Ltd)

    This project is a must for our area, it will establish the airport as a major hub and bring much needed jobs and money to the local economy. This project needs to go ahead for the future heath of the... Read more

  • Richard Mathers

    The proposal for Gatwick Airport to move to a duel runway operation will have a negative impact on the local area, and contradicts the governments aim to reduse the UK's carbon footprint. Duel runway... Read more

  • Richard Samways

    The South East needs more runway capacity. Even though I live on the fringe of the Northern flight path, I still consider the overall benefit outweighs any noise issues. Gatwick have kept their... Read more

  • A E Chapman & Son Ltd (A E Chapman & Son Ltd)

    To keep abreast of the changes and how this will affect roads and access to our business and any health & safety issues to our colleagues. Also the change to our current boundary and the effects this... Read more

  • Adrian Roberts

    Aircraft noise, especially in early and late hours, has become much worse in recent years, leading to an adverse effect on life and increased levels of (redacted). At times, flight after flight flies... Read more

  • Alan Graham Mitchell

    I would like to have more detail on the economic benefits of the project to the local community. There is no breakdown on how this has been calculated and it appears to have been exaggerated. In... Read more

  • Andrew Shipton

    No matter how much the plans say they are considering the impact of noise and air pollution, neither can be mitigated for hence I do not agree with the development.

  • Beverly Clayden

    increased number of noisy low flying planes at all times of the day and night. With a second runway which is an emergency run way this will only increase. The smell of plane fuel can be smelt... Read more

  • Brighton & Hove Economic Partnership (Brighton & Hove Economic Partnership)

    The Brighton & Hove Economic Partnership is primarily interested in the economic impact of the scheme and value added in terms of jobs and tourism. Current figures suggest that the expansion activity... Read more

  • Caroline Tayler

    I am totally opposed to expansion at Gatwick. With global warming evident, more traffic at Gatwick in the air and on the road will make climate change even worse. Gatwick brings misery to residents... Read more

  • Catherine Baart

    This is described as national infrastructure. However the benefits will accrue to a private company. The government's Climate Commission has stated that no airports should expand because of the... Read more

  • Claire Victoria Trevethan

    Alongside the obvious increase in noise, carbon emissions, pollution etc. As it is effectively a rural airport which operates 24/7, this would impact several areas of outstanding natural beauty... Read more

  • Diane Page

    A second runway will destroy the village of Charlwood and other surrounding villages. Even with a noise envelope it will significantly worsen the noise and air pollution. This goes against the UK's... Read more

  • Elaine Blaikley

    I am against the proposal. Higher pollution levels from increased cars and flights will adversely affect people's health in the area. The M25 and other roads to Gatwick are already extremely busy,... Read more