Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.
-
Living 11 miles from Gatwick, I strongly object to the expansion/proposal of using the northern runway on a regular basis for the following reasons: - The current 55 aircraft movements per hour...
Read more
-
This is not a sustainable project; how can anyone with any real understanding of what is happening to our climate push to expand on more air pollution? Use the project money to get sustainable fuels...
Read more
-
Do not go ahead. Totally unnecessary.
-
I fully support this investment, our region needs it very much, I think it is the right thing to do.
-
What is in effect a second runway will further destroy the peace and quiet of this AONB. Gatwick planes create a huge amount of noise, including in the night at times when they are not supposed to be...
Read more
-
I oppose this Gatwick Airport application for a northern runway because it is an extra runway which will have a significant impact on the local environment. I am deeply concerned with the impact on...
Read more
-
Yes we want this project to go ahead
-
Good idea
-
Good for local employment Good for tourism Good for holidays
-
Totally agree that there should be a second runway
-
I've very very concerned on many grounds, and recommend that you do not proceed with a second runway 1. Environmental impact - we should be reducing not increasing flights. 2. Noise pollution 3. Air...
Read more
-
Local roads will not cope with huge amounts of increased traffic. Massive air pollution will make it unbearable to live near the flight path. Countryside will be destroyed in such a beautiful green...
Read more
-
I worked at Gatwick for over 25 years and it has to contend with the likes of Schipol that has at least 5 runways. Gatwick has been needing to expand for decades.
-
I’m not in favour of this proposal. Too much expansion in the South East of England already.
-
Having lived under the flight path of Gatwick for 30+ years the noise, pollution and frequency of flights and flight hours has increased not just around Mid Sussex but on the approach routes. Having...
Read more
-
Noise, environment, infrastructure
-
We strongly object to the proposed use of Gatwick’s emergency runway. This goes against the policy of lowering carbon emissions. Gatwick already is beset by airline delays and increasing further...
Read more
-
Aircraft at the moment fly over my back garden whuchnusbibtrusuve and noisy and more than often one after another with a few minutes in between The aircraft are getting larger by the day. Also the...
Read more
-
I am vehemently opposed to this proposal on the following grounds: i). Environmental impact - we are facing a major global climate emergency and should be seeking ways of significantly reducing our...
Read more
-
I am against the plans for Gatwick airport as I live on the route of the flight path and whether they are taking off or landing there is a lot of noise from the plans during the day, evening and...
Read more
-
My strong objection to this application for Gatwick's expansion is based on the following ; * Huge increases in greenhouse gases ie; CO2 emissions. There is global evidence that we are already...
Read more
-
Increases in aircraft numbers will cause extreme noise pollution and a huge reduction in air quality for all local residents and a particular concern is the impact on the health of children living...
Read more
-
In summary, I object to the proposal for a second runway at Gatwick Airport on three grounds. First, the Government examined the question of airport expansion and chose Heathrow, not Gatwick....
Read more
-
Need 2nd runways
-
I have no issues with this project. The airport requires to grow to remain competitive and to meet demand. I live locally and the growth will provide jobs for the community and surrounding areas...
Read more