Skip to main content
Find a National Infrastructure Project

Beta This is a beta service - your feedback will help us to improve it

Filter
Hinckley National Rail Freight Interchange

Relevant representations (registration comments)

Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.

Showing 251 to 275 of 1424 representations, newest first.

Results per page 25 | View 50 results per page | View 100 results per page

  • Donna Towers

    As a resident of Burbage village since birth I am strongly concerned about the environmental impact this will have on the area and it’s surroundings. I would like to know more about why this site has... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 June 2023

  • Dr Janet Iris Dutnall Higgins

    A.1. Macro: Consideration must be given to the value of the purpose of this vast project, and if it will fulfil the reasons given for its development. 2.Consideration must be given as to whether the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 June 2023

  • Elaine Worden

    I oppose the rail freight terminal going ahead, due to several reasons. Increased traffic on the roads causing delays and increased air and noise pollution. The terminal is planned to be built on... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 June 2023

  • Electromech Design and Assembly Ltd (Electromech Design and Assembly Ltd)

    No objection providing the developer pays due regard to the local environment and ensures the development is in keeping with its rural location and does not impact on Burbage Common in any way.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 June 2023

  • Elizabeth Davenport

    I wish to object to this proposed project due to the extremely negative impact on the countryside, flora and fauna of the area as well as the health and wellbeing of the local population from the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 June 2023

  • Elizabeth Milton

    I am concerned about the impact on local countryside and wildlife, plus traffic implications.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 June 2023

  • F & J Gent (F & J Gent)

    REPRESENTATIONS FROM F & J GENT FARMERS We own and farm land at Highgate Lodge Farm, Station Road, Stoney Stanton, which immediately adjoins the application site. Our land falls within the area... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 June 2023

  • Gary Meyrick

    I feel the location of the huge developments so close to Burbage common will have a very detrimental effect on both wildlife and peoples enjoyment of this wild space. This would come from the added... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 June 2023

  • Gary Towers

    1 - The area is surrounded by small villages and as such the infrastructure is already overstretched with new builds, warehousing and the A5 which is a farce as a major road. 2 - I fear for the health... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 June 2023

  • georgina jackson

    the noise, pollution, traffic and detrimental effects to the environment and loss of nature is far too devastating to everyone for this to go ahead.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 June 2023

  • Gillian Lord

    More loss of beautiful green space. Detrimentally bad for the environment in an already highly polluted area. Even more congestion.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 June 2023

  • Gillian Mary Barsby

    Introduction I am [REDACTED] years old and have lived in Elmesthorpe for over 20 years and along with my family help run a livery yard business. This proposed development will be right up to our... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 June 2023

  • Glenda E Skellern

    I think the most objections are because it is in a relatively well off area. If it was near me I doubt there would be such a fuss. Wherever it goes it will be in somebodies back yard. If it is a... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 June 2023

  • Graham Ellard

    I am extremely concerned about the increased volume of HGV vehicles that will be using the A47 to reach the A5 or M69. This Road only has one pathway with a cycle path and is used from early morning... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 June 2023

  • Greg Jones

    This project is not taking place on brownfield sites, but on green belt, ie. fields, hedgerows and woodland. The environmental impact of this project will be huge for both the flora and fauna in the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 June 2023

  • Gweneth Dianne Thorp

    Intrusion on Burbage Common, Increase in commercial traffic on surrounding roads. Pollution

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 June 2023

  • Hannah Margaret Gillian Illston-Barsby

    Introduction I am [redacted] years old and have lived in Elmesthorpe for over 20 years and during that time I have built my Horse Livery Stables into a very successful business. If this development... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 June 2023

  • Harborough District Council (Harborough District Council)

    The Council considers that the scale of the proposed development and its implication are significant. Our main issues and concerns are that, 1. The proposed development will generate significant... Read more

    Submitted by: Local authorities
    Date submitted: 22 June 2023

  • Andrew Harvey on behalf of Harvey (Harvey)

    Safety aspects due to increase of traffic through surrounding villages. Environmental impact arising from warehouse construction, use and maintenance. Loss of “green” area and farmland to yet another... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 June 2023

  • Heather White

    Objection to planning for Hinckley Rail Freight Terminal

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 June 2023

  • Helen Coombs

    Leicester and Leicestershire Strategic Growth Plan identifies, amongst other things “inadequate transport infrastructure, causing congestion; gaps in the road and rail network; pressures on existing... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 June 2023

  • Helen Vanes

    Impacts: 1) Pollution levels I would wish to see a fully, verifiably independent (not like the purchasing of PPE/services during the pandemic) research report with a good wide brief and funding, to... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 June 2023

  • Ian Newham

    This will lead to more housing development, more traffic, more pressure on school places, parking chaos and most importantly destruction of green belt land. All in the name of so called progress which... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 June 2023

  • Ian Shipley

    I think it is marvelous project and should be fully supported.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 June 2023

  • Ian Williams

    This will impact massively on an already congested road network and have a huge detrimental effect on green spaces used by thousands of local people.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 June 2023