Skip to main content
Find a National Infrastructure Project

Beta This is a beta service - your feedback will help us to improve it

Filter
Hinckley National Rail Freight Interchange

Relevant representations (registration comments)

Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.

Showing 501 to 525 of 1424 representations, newest first.

Results per page 25 | View 50 results per page | View 100 results per page

  • Keith Sansby

    The A5 already has warehouses virtually its entire length between Hinckley and the M1. A similar development would destroy the peace and tranquility of Burbage Common. An area we and many others like... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 21 June 2023

  • Kenneth Wallace

    The local infrastructure is simply unable to cope with the inevitable increase in traffic and, potentially, housing demand

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 21 June 2023

  • Kerry baker

    Why do we need freight terminal in Hinckley when there is one in Rugby? Why not expand that one instead of planning it where traffic is already a problem. The surrounding roads simply will not cope... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 21 June 2023

  • Kevin Bragg

    The proposed buildings will be a visual encroachment for anyone using Burbage Common. This leisure area and green space will loose its environmental and mental health benefits. Without doubt there... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 21 June 2023

  • Kevin Sherrin-Jones

    I am not adverse to progress and moving forward with projects within our area. My main concern volume of traffic on the A5 approaching the Longshoot and progressing towards the M69 junction. Likewise... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 21 June 2023

  • Kim Liggins

    My concern is about the likelihood of increased traffic flow along the A5 corridor between the M42 and the M69. I live in Witherley and access to and from the village from and on to the A5 is... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 21 June 2023

  • Laura carvell

    I am so disappointed to see such a gorgeous part of our countryside disappearing to much a huge project. I worry for how this will affect the traffic on an already dangerous road on clickers way. What... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 21 June 2023

  • Laura Phillpot

    I don’t want this project to go ahead as it will be detrimental to the local green space, increasing pollution for local residents and wildlife as well as damaging wildlife habitats. Additionally... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 21 June 2023

  • Lee Shaun Bewell

    I think the plans are perfectly acceptable for the local area and have my support 100%.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 21 June 2023

  • Leicester Forest and Lubbesthorpe District (Leicester Forest and Lubbesthorpe District)

    My constituents of 5000 are veermently against such a ridiculous proposal on infrastructure that will just not support all the additional traffic

    Submitted by: Non-statutory organisations
    Date submitted: 21 June 2023

  • Leon Adam Pegg

    Having seen the effects of large scale development on what was a village i am concerned about the impact of this very large development on the quality of life of local people through increased... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 21 June 2023

  • Lesley Mitchell

    The loss of habitat for the wild life major concern as there is a mass decline that is happening across the uK through rural land being lost, increase of traffic and its effects on our environment and... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 21 June 2023

  • Linda Khalid

    This application is lacking in detail. There is no joined up infrastructure planning in the area. The Midlands is already a logistics nightmare for those living in it. We have several hubs already in... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 21 June 2023

  • Lindy Marietta Littleton

    I would like to know more about the impact it will have on the environment and the surrounding area

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 21 June 2023

  • Lorraine Spicer Leigh

    It will be in direct to our Property Noise pollution will have a direct impact on us Light pollution from the flood lights and the lorries Air Pollution from the lorries loading and unloading 24 hours... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 21 June 2023

  • Louise Hough

    Will damage wildlife and people's homes and well being

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 21 June 2023

  • Louise Newbury-Smith

    The local area has already had significant changes as a result of large scale distribution centres on the edge of Hinckley on the A5. Even with development to the surrounding roads, the increased... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 21 June 2023

  • Lynda Hodgkins

    This will impact with traffic increase. Too close to Burbage Common a well loved open space for the residents of Hinckley and Bosworth borough. The infrastructure in this area cannot cope with the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 21 June 2023

  • Lynne Laine

    Will there be an increase in heavy lorries moving freight

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 21 June 2023

  • Malcolm Bryan Lees

    Site – Greenfield. No review of brownfield sites. No review of other better ? development sites. The site is a water storage/flood avoidance resource Provides well used access routes to Burbage Common... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 21 June 2023

  • Malcolm Clayson

    In my opinion this development should not go ahead for a number of reasons: First the massive increase in traffic movements will lead to increased levels of air and noise pollution from diesel rail... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 21 June 2023

  • Mark Kevin Malin on behalf of Malin (Malin)

    Increased traffic along brookside and Burbage village without new infrastructure and also the roads between Burbage and Hinckley that cannot cope with the traffic as it is. The increased noise levels... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 21 June 2023

  • Mandy Copson

    Area not suitable for such a huge development.Burbage common and local wildlife will suffer, roads not suitable for all the additional HEAVY TRAFFIC that will have to be used to build it and to... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 21 June 2023

  • Margaret Patricia Smith

    My main concerns are the impact upon Burbage woods and common and the local environment. We also have only a small amount of truely wild areas around here and the farmland and open land surrounding... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 21 June 2023

  • Marian Eames

    Rail Freight Terminal Burbage Common An unnecessary and environmentally destructive proposal. Many people enjoy Burbage Common and this would be detrimental to this as it is an easily accessible area... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 21 June 2023