Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.
-
Hinckley is a small town with limited roads in and out, those are already heavily congested at peak times and it can take little extra to become gridlocked. Increased traffic from workers and...
Read more
-
We enjoy Burbage Common on a regular basis and do not want to see the area destroyed.....
-
Burbage Common is probably the only good thing about Hinckley, and these plans look likely to ruin it. The increase in road traffic in the area alone should be grounds to reject these plans. The claim...
Read more
-
Hinckley National Rail Freight Interchange - Registration of Objection I am a resident in the village of Elmesthorpe Leicestershire and own a property along Burbage Common Road, and have lived here...
Read more
-
The common is a defining part of the Burbage and Hinckley area, used by many on a daily basis as an escape from the noise of the busy surrounding towns and villages. It houses precious wildlife and...
Read more
-
The proposed rail terminal should be refused because: 1. Local roads cannot handle the large amount of extra traffic, both trucks and (commuter) cars. There has been a lot of warehouse development...
Read more
-
This is a badly planned, unnecessary development that is going to have a significant impact on the lives of local residents and wildlife. There are a number of similar interchanges built (or under...
Read more
-
Main impacts are noise and light pollution, traffic congestion, deterioration of the local green space around Hinckley. This development is less than 800m from residential properties, from our...
Read more
-
I want to to tell you about the issues that this development could have on the local environment and why the proposed scale is deemed necessary and in fitting with the rural characteristics of...
Read more
-
This proposal is unnecessary as there are already similar facilities locally, Magna Park, DIRFT & Kegworth for example. There is also recently opened the huge DPD distribution centre on the A5,...
Read more
-
Impact on local roads and communities by increased traffic volumes
-
I am in favour of the proposal. I think it will help with the growth and maintenance of local businesses. I am in favour of the M69 slip road changes as this will open opportunities for the area.
-
Traffic congestion Pollution Travel delays - rail crossings Destroying green space
-
There is no democracy on how this will affect the local area with pollution and disruption to the local enviroment and ecology of the area.
-
Hi, I can not understand how the Railway line runs from Nuneaton to Felixstowe on looking at railway maps I can not see the link, but as in Tritax plans it states it does. I can not understand why is...
Read more
-
In its quarterly review, the Office of Rail and Road has revealed statistics highlighting the impact of the UK’s economic position on freight rail usage and performance from January to March 2023. The...
Read more
-
The proposed location for HNRFI is in an area that is already saturated with rail and road freight locations. DIRFT (Daventry) is very close and so is the enormous new site at East Midlands Airport....
Read more
-
A totally unnecessary development that will devastate an area of local beauty and bring a significant increase in traffic both heavy and domestic to the local area.
-
This project will concrete over hundreds of Hectares of farm and green belt land and abut up to a local community area, being Burbage Common Woods and will no doubt spoil the enjoyment of the peace &...
Read more
-
Burbage Common is an important environmental asset for the surrounding community. Going ahead with this plan would destroy it both from a social point of view, but also from an environmental...
Read more
-
My major concerns are as follows: • The immediate and overbearing proximity to both Elmesthorpe residents and the bordering SSSI, would suggest that the site chosen is not suitable for such a proposal...
Read more
-
1) No Requirement for HNRFI 1.1) Government policy is that “It is important that SRFIs are located “near the business markets they will serve (NPS paragraph 2.56)” and with the existing nine...
Read more
-
Do we have to have it because it’s government policy? No - Government policy is to build a national network of strategic rail freight interchanges (SRFls) BUT the regulations stipulate that they...
Read more
-
1 Not convinced we need another rail freight terminal when there are others in the area ( reported 7 within 40mile radius). 2 Despite the mitigation measures proposed the terminal will still have an...
Read more
-
I believe that this totally unnecessary huge development will seriously affect the quality of life of the thousands of people who will be affected by the pollution that will be generated by it 24/7....
Read more