Filter
Hinckley National Rail Freight Interchange

Relevant representations (registration comments)

Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.

Showing 1051 to 1075 of 1424 representations, newest first.

Results per page 25 | View 50 results per page | View 100 results per page

  • Burbage Parish Council (Burbage Parish Council)

    * - Consultation The consultation from Tritax was not adequate to fully explain to residents the impacts, particularly on traffic volumes through Burbage. o Blaby District Council (AoC-001)... Read more

    Submitted by: Parish councils
    Date submitted: 22 June 2023

  • C Matharu

    The proposed HNRFI would form a large-scale new rail freight interchange on land just outside the boundary of Hinckley Borough, next to Burbage Common. Proposals include logistics and warehousing,... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 June 2023

  • Cadent Gas (Cadent Gas)

    RELEVANT REPRESENTATION Representation by Cadent Gas Limited (Cadent) to the Hinkley National Rail Freight Interchange Development Consent Order (DCO) Cadent is a licensed gas transporter under the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 June 2023

  • Carly Harper

    The change in the local area over the last few years has been dramatic with vast housing estates being build. I find the idea of removing more green areas a dreadful same. I would not be in favour of... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 June 2023

  • Carol Giles

    Hinckley is struggling to cope with traffic as it is. The freight line will bring in far too much heavy traffic, cause more accidents, block up our roads and bring much more pollution to the area.... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 June 2023

  • Caroline Rimmington

    Should this project go ahead it will have a huge environmental impact upon our local green space and woodland, Burbage Common. This included the destruction and displacement of the ecosystem and also... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 June 2023

  • Christopher Measom

    From a personal point of view, living so close to the development will mean we are subject to greater noise and light pollution on a 24hr basis. As i understand the plans,the railway sidings will... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 June 2023

  • Claire whysall

    Not only are you going to take more of our open land/nature but this is going to add more to our air pollution, we have lived this long without this line we do NOT need it! Let our kids have the open... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 June 2023

  • Clive Tyson

    The massive increase in house building in and around Hinckley coupled with a similar situation in nearby Nuneaton, has resulted in much greater congestion on the main arterial roads. This has a very... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 June 2023

  • Colin Phillips

    I am in favour of the proposed application which will provide much needed employment in a rural area

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 June 2023

  • Colin Staniforth

    Burbage cannot continue wth these sort of developments without significant improvements to the infrastructure Sapcote road into hinckley gets large tailbacks every day already

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 June 2023

  • Darran Thomas

    The rail hub will vastly increase light pollution which will have a significant adverse affect on wildlife in the Burbage woods area. There is no guarantee that HGV vehicles travelling to and from the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 June 2023

  • Darren Dawkins

    With the other local rail hubs nearby such as DIRFT at Rugby, this is not needed. Also the local employment rate is low, so the perceived benefits in this area will be minimal. It will lead to added... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 June 2023

  • Darren Leigh

    I object to the proposal of the HNRFI. Elmesthorpe is a small beautiful village which will be destroyed by this project. The traffic infrastructure will no be able to cope with a project of this size... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 June 2023

  • David Christopher Bill MBE

    * Selection of site. No local end user thus substantial onward journeys by road. * Plethora of similar sites in vicinity. Need for spread of rail/road interchanges across the country and not all based... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 June 2023

  • David James Black

    In the current era of supplies being sourced from other countries, we as a country should be more self sufficient both in agriculture and manufacturing.There is a great danger in being dependent to a... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 June 2023

  • David John Tremeer

    My concern is the volume of extra traffic that may use the B4668/A47 in a northbound direction. These roads are already very busy and in particular the A47 approaching Leicester is through housing and... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 June 2023

  • David Kent

    Concerned about the environmental impact and loss of green spaces in the area.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 June 2023

  • David Michael brogden

    Stop this project now The town is already ring fenced with warehouses and the roads cannot cope now. All of our green space is being given over to new housing and this latest proposal will be the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 June 2023

  • David Taylor

    Our green spaces are being eroded continually, every month we lose some somewhere locally, and secondly the traffic, this will increase an already very busy road system when the new roads meet the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 June 2023

  • David Thompson

    I am opposed to the building of the Hinckley Rail Freight Interchange for a number of reasons. My key concerns to date are: -Utilisation of an already highly utilised rail link. The link between... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 June 2023

  • Dennis Shore

    I feel this development will be a disaster for the area. It is huge. Will significantly increase traffic to already grid locked roads in and around Burbage and Hinckley. There are often crashes on the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 June 2023

  • Derek Marvin

    The project is in the wrong place and slashes through greenfield countryside massively impacting ecology, traffic levels, noise and air pollution and destroying an unspoilt area and the view from... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 June 2023

  • Don Paul Makepeace

    Environmental Impacts.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 June 2023

  • Donna Towers

    As a resident of Burbage village since birth I am strongly concerned about the environmental impact this will have on the area and it’s surroundings. I would like to know more about why this site has... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 June 2023