Skip to main content
Find a National Infrastructure Project

This is a beta service - your feedback will help us to improve it


Filter

Cambridge Waste Water Treatment Plant Relocation

Relevant representations (registration comments)

Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.

Showing 151 to 175 of 309 representations, newest first.

Results per page 25 | View 50 results per page | View 100 results per page

  • Florian Urmetzer

    I would like to object to the proposed construction of a sewage plant on the Honey Hill sites, for multiple reasons: 1) The site is greenbelt land, and building on green belt land is contrary to... Read more

  • Luke Proctor

    I'm concerned about continued access to the right of way on Low Fen Drove Way (from High Ditch Road to Horningsea Road) which I use multiple times a week.

  • Margaret Wilson

    In a time of economic depression why are we moving a perfectly functional sewage works less than two miles into green belt land along with inferstructure covering many miles of green belt including a... Read more

  • Oana Stroe

    To whom it may concern, I am writing to you as a resident of Horningsea in Cambridgeshire to express my concerns regarding the relocation of the Cambridge Waste Water Treatment Plant from the current... Read more

  • Quy Fen Trust (Quy Fen Trust)

    Please see attached

  • Richard McMahon

    I should like to object to the proposed relocation on the following points, which are widely shared: - There appears to have been no serious attempt to consider alternative approaches particularly... Read more

  • Stewart Holmes

    I am placing my objection to the relocation of the Cambridge Water treatment, sewage treatment center. I feel, there needs to be clearly outlined impact, which well be caused by this development.

  • The Asplin Family (The Asplin Family) on behalf of The Asplin Family (The Asplin Family)

    Cambridge Waste Water Treatment Plant Relocation Planning Inspectorate Project Reference: WW010003 Relevant Representation: The Asplin Family objections 16th July 2023 1) The Anglian Water proposal... Read more

  • Wai Ming Lee

    Solid solution to prevent odour, pollution and sewage overflows and also the impacts on traffic and sewage charge should be provided for public to consider and comment.

  • Chris Carter-Chapman

    I strongly oppose the plans to demolish the existing sewage works and relocate it, less than a mile away from the current site, on green belt land. The arable farmland that will be lost is not... Read more

  • Ian Harvey

    My principal objection is that this is building on the Green Belt around Cambridge. All the reasons for preserving a Green Belt apply here: - loss of arable land, especially in an age when 'food... Read more

  • Sean Dixon

    I would like to register my objection to the relocation of the Cambridge Sewage works, and for that relocation to be to the Honey Hill site. I don’t believe that the sewage works needs to be relocated... Read more

  • Anna Edge

    The proposed relocation of the sewage works to green belt land is in my opinion wrong. It is not operationally necessary to move the sewage works. And is disingenuous to imply that the proposed new... Read more

  • Cara Griffith

    My parents live close to where Anglian Water want to relocate the sewage work. My objections are that it is unnecessary, and the cost of moving it could be spent on more vital projects required in and... Read more

  • CWWTPR -GDPR001

    The construction will block my cycle route to school. [Redacted]. The digging of the pipeline will make this impossible. I'm concerned children in the village will loose their independence. It will be... Read more

  • Gerald Edward Spraggs

    AW ‘About the Project’ states that storm sewer overflows and CSOs are ‘far less likely to occur’. What will be the new likelihood and risk? Where is the analysis to show minimisation of likelihood and... Read more

  • Hugh Robinson

    I wish to object on the grounds that the project is solely to facilitate the development for housing of the existing site. It does not make financial or environmental sense to move a functioning... Read more

  • Jack lambert

    Complete destruction of important wildlife habitat (greenbelt) already there's been a visible amount of disruption causing animals to flee towards the road and village this will only get worse and... Read more

  • James Barry

    This application is essentially an abuse of process, seeking to obtain hundreds of millions of pounds of taxpayers’ money to fund the completely unnecessary relocation of a perfectly well-functioning... Read more

  • John Cross

    Object to and request rejection of the proposed location of the site because: - Environmental consequences that will not manifest until after commencement of construction and long after completion of... Read more

  • John wilson

    Re sighting in green belt Unnessary waste of money at a time of economic hard times on an unessary project

  • Mrs J J Conroy

    RR 14-07-2023 Ref Anglian Water – Cambridge Waste Water Treatment Works Introduction The focus of this representation is on the Harm to Green Belt and Very Special Circumstances. The case is made that... Read more

  • Robert King

    I think the project will be a disaster for local wildlife and the effects of pollution will really affect my and my families well being

  • Sphere25 (Sphere25) on behalf of Trinity College Cambridge (Trinity College Cambridge)

    Trinity College Cambridge ( TCC) is the principal owner and custodian of Cambridge Science Park (CSP) located to the west of the Milton Road Wastewater Treatment Works. TCC understands the need to... Read more

  • UK Health Security Agency (UK Health Security Agency)

    Thank you for your consultation regarding the above development. The UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) welcomes the opportunity to comment on your proposals at this stage of the project. Please note... Read more