Filter

The Sizewell C Project

Relevant representations (registration comments)

Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.

Showing 601 to 650 of 1290 representations, newest first.

Results per page View 25 results per page | 50 | View 100 results per page

  • Radiation Free Lakeland (Radiation Free Lakeland)

    Radiation Free Lakeland do not recognise the legality of this consultation. "There should be no commitment to a large programme of nuclear fission power until it has been demonstrated beyond... Read more

  • Roderick Orr-Ewing

    1. Site Selection I am concerned that the site is at risk from the effects of climate change, principally seal level rise and flooding. The site could become an island containing 5 nuclear reactors... Read more

  • Roger Hall

    I have lived in Suffolk for all my 75 years, we have endured 2 nuclear power stations at Sizewell, the countries biggest docks at Felixstowe, the largest of shore wind farm, massive power lines, new... Read more

  • Roger Holmes

    I am particularly interested in the future increase of traffic as my property is about 50ft away from the A12. But this is as nothing compared to the concerns of the long term storage of radioactive... Read more

  • Ruth Redgrave

    My concerns re EDF's DCO application are: 1. Site Selection I believe that the site at Sizewell is at risk from climate change, sea level rise and flooding. Coastal erosion and processes could impact... Read more

  • Sara-Jane Eaton

    I am very concerned about the proposals for Sizewell C. I am concerned about the potential damage to the Suffolk coastline and the negative impact that this will have on its rare species and habitats.... Read more

  • Sarah Doe

    To whom it may concern I wish to raise the following issues of concern about Sizewell C. As someone who lives close by to the proposed site and visits the area frequently I am compelled to express my... Read more

  • Sarah Zins

    I list below my areas of concern about Sizewell C. 1. Technology • I consider that the technology under consideration could be outdated by the time that Sizewell C is built, or nuclear output may no... Read more

  • Simon Ransome

    I strongly object to the building of nuclear power station Sizewell C on the following grounds. The down side costs are too huge to contemplate , particularly the pollution caused by construction inc... Read more

  • Steve Black

    This is a huge white elephant that Electricty is more expensive than renewables and the resulting waste will pollute the earth and will endanger many generations of mankind. It will be too late to... Read more

  • Sue Baugh

    I have many concerns about the construction of and need for a nuclear power plant at Sizewell C. Below are my main concerns. LOCATION This is the wrong project in the location. The Suffolk coast is at... Read more

  • Susan Sapsed

    As a mother, grandmother and great grandmother my main concerns are for the younger generations who will live with the results of the inspectorate's decision for many years. These concerns include:... Read more

  • Tabitha Jones

    I wish to raise the following issues of concern about Sizewell C. 1. Site Selection I believe it is the wrong project in the wrong place: Site at risk from climate change, sea level rise and flooding.... Read more

  • Trevor Fisk

    At the end of sizewell b construction. Tourism was virtually nil. It took nearly 1w years before it started to return. I fear things will be much worse this time as more workers in the area will mean... Read more

  • Tristan Winter

    I completely support this project, the local area needs the money,jobs and infrastructure that will be delivered by the successful application for building this power station. Leiston has been... Read more

  • A C Lonsdale

    The prohibitive cost of Sizewell C prevents it being a viable project. It also prevents expansion in renewables, which is the way forward. Neither Sizewell A nor Sizewell B brought permanent... Read more

  • Alan lofting

    The technology of nuclear fission is rapidly becoming outdated and as is well known the costs are far greater than renewable technologies . The possible connection with China is dismaying as it leaves... Read more

  • Alex Sainsbury

    Sizewell C would likely be an economic disaster. EDf’s current EPR model nuclear power stations are not functional anywhere, not in Finland, France, nor at Hinkley Point. EDF have publicly admitted... Read more

  • Alexandra Langdon

    I wish to raise the following issues of concern about Sizewell C. Site Selection I believe it is the wrong project in the wrong place. It will have an Adverse impact on adjacent internationally... Read more

  • Alice Bridges

    I have loved Suffolk and lived in the area since 1986. I wish to raise the following concerns about Sizewell C. 1. Site Selection I believe it is the wrong project in the wrong place · Site at... Read more

  • Alice Bridges

    Relevant Representations of Stop Sizewell C (the campaign name of Theberton and Eastbridge Action Group on Sizewell Ltd) 1. Application Explanatory Memorandum We wish to raise concerns about the... Read more

  • Alison Dennison

    1. The site This is the wrong project and the wrong place for it because: The coastline site is incredibly fragile with a history of erosion which is being made worse by climate change, leading to... Read more

  • Alistair Gordon-Brown

    The EPR project by EDF has proven to be impossible to complete economically. The Finish experience should ,as a pilot project, be scrutinised during the planning process. Starting in 2005 it is not... Read more

  • Andrew Reid

    The application made by EDF fails to address key issues which matter to residents in East Suffolk, resulting in an unsustainable transport strategy. By failing to actively pursue rail-led... Read more

  • Anglian Water Services Ltd (Anglian Water Services Ltd)

    Thank for you the opportunity to comment on the Sizewell C Power Station project. Anglian Water is considered to be a statutory consultee for nationally significant infrastructure projects as... Read more

  • Ann Follows

    I am a local resident living about eight miles from Sizewell. The proposed development will alter the environment, the economy and the quality of life of the local population for the duration of the... Read more

  • Anne Tyerman

    I strongly object to this project which will destroy this glorious coastline of outstanding natural beauty which I have been close to since 1962. The impact of the large scale building work on small... Read more

  • Anne Westover

    I strongly object to the proposal to build SZC. The location on the sensitive Suffolk coast and within our nationally designated coastal ‘Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty’ (AONB) is unacceptable for... Read more

  • Annette Lisa Story Vigar

    I intend to make the following submissions: - the issue of the huge increase in road traffic, - the irreversible despoliation of the AONB, - the strain on local services (already stretched) from an... Read more

  • Anthony Mackintosh

    This area of East Suffolk is well populated and contains several areas of Special Scientific interest. The construction and operation of Sizewell C will disrupt and in some cases destroy these... Read more

  • Antony Philip Baskett

    The project is to big for the area. Surrounding roads are not able to cope the amount of traffic. The new link road devastates farm land, making farming the land unviable. The devastation to the... Read more

  • Arthur Stansfield

    Like much of EdF’s consultation the proposed mitigation is superficial. They have failed to consult sincerely and taken responses into account. The offered mitigation seldom makes amends for the... Read more

  • atomstopp_atomkraftfrei leben! (atomstopp_atomkraftfrei leben!)

    Our organisation has to reject the project UK EPR™ for several reasons. We could not find sufficient proof of safe disposal for spent fuel and radioactive waste in the documents. We even are missing... Read more

  • Ayres Family

    1. We are a household of six and have lived at [redacted] The house and barns can be dated to the early 17th Century. We have also acquired surrounding arable farmland and currently own 37 acres in... Read more

  • Boyton Parish Council (Boyton Parish Council)

    Boyton is a coastal village, approx 15 miles due south of Sizewell on the Alde estuary, looking out to sea and the off-shore wind farms. On behalf of the parish residents, we wish to raise the... Read more

  • Brian Lowry

    I wish to raise the following issues of concern about Sizewell C. This is too big a project for the present infrastructure of roads, our delicate and acclaimed wildlife habitats and at a time when... Read more

  • Brightwell, Foxhall & Purdis Farm Group Parish Council (Brightwell, Foxhall & Purdis Farm Group Parish Council)

    The Group Parish Council’s principal concern is the development of a Freight Management Facility near the Seven Hills A12 / A14 junction. Not only will the site itself be an unwanted intrusion into a... Read more

  • Bryant Maitland

    1. I am concerned about the effect on wildlife -birds in particular due to the proximity of the new power station to Minsmere RSPB site-Sir David Attenborough is drawing our attention to the danger of... Read more

  • C Foster

    I have many concerns short and long term issues regarding the following aspects of the proposed development: • long term implications of nuclear waste, with unknown strategies, costs and future safety... Read more

  • Caroline McHugh

    I must express in the strongest terms my objection to the development of Sizewell C for the following reasons: - The potential threat to an area of outstanding beauty and wildlife. - The huge increase... Read more

  • Catherine Lindsay-Davies

    I wish to raise the following issues of concern about Sizewell C. I believe this site is unsuitable as it will have a catastrophic impact on the local area in terms of its precious natural environment... Read more

  • Charles Croydon

    1. Site Selection I believe it is the wrong project in the wrong place Site at risk from climate change, sea level rise and flooding Adverse impact on adjacent internationally designated sites of... Read more

  • Chas Bazeley

    There are several questions that remain unanswered regarding this application: 1) If nuclear power is safe, why is this generator not being sited on the Thames close to London where the demand is... Read more

  • Chillesford Parish Meeting (Chillesford Parish Meeting)

    This is the registration of interest in the Sizewell C DCO proposal by EDF from Chillesford Parish Meeting. We have responded to all stages of pre-consultation though note that only responses to stage... Read more

  • Chris McCarthy

    The site is in the wrong place. Its at risk from the effects of climate change. Sea levels have risen on the East Coast and are rising every year. Flooding is of concern. The proposed site is... Read more

  • Christopher Haydn Morris

    Why would junction improvements need to be made to the A12/B1119 junction in Saxmundham?

  • Clara Rose

    I wanted to register my complaint against the proposed sizewell C. As a resident of the area the extra traffic, pollution both now and in the long term with radio active waste cannot benefit the area.... Read more

  • Clifford M. Reed

    Sizewell C would be a permanent and highly intrusive imposition on the Suffolk Herirage Coast and the Suffolk Coast and Heaths AONB. It would threaten the biodiversity of a wildlife-rich area by... Read more

  • Cllr Tony Cooper

    I am focus on the immediate local effects on Leiston. The main issues I would like to raise and take forward to the examination are; 1. Transport. ? Controls are required for bus movements and... Read more

  • Dave Fleetham

    I wish to register the following concerns about the proposed Sizewell C development: I am opposed to the proposed development on the following grounds: The Site Is wholly inappropriate for a nuclear... Read more