Filter

The Sizewell C Project

Relevant representations (registration comments)

Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.

Showing 1276 to 1290 of 1290 representations, newest first.

Results per page 25 | View 50 results per page | View 100 results per page

  • Wayne Jones

    Safety Concerns about EPR design . Is the reactor safe from aviation disasters and threat of military action ? Suitability of Development Platform. What are the uncertainties regarding future... Read more

  • Wendy Cooper

    The proposed site is not suitable for a large nuclear power station. Sizewell C will have lasting, and some irreversible, negative effects on the environment, the landscape and the economy. There will... Read more

  • Wendy Ellis

    As a user of Sizewell beach and marshes for recreational use I am very concerned about the adverse impact this will have, both in the short and long term. Also the danger of flooding to the site, I do... Read more

  • William Seale

    My wife and I would like to register our strongest objections to the proposed construction of a third Nuclear Power Station at Sizewell. Our primary objection is the whole idea of nuclear power. This... Read more

  • Woodbridge Lib Dem Action Network (Woodbridge Lib Dem Action Network)

    The principle submissions I intend to make in my Representation are: 1. The development of Sizewell C will cause massive disruption for the area I live in and have an unfair effect on this area from... Read more

  • Colin Palmer

    Please see attached letter.

  • East Cambridgeshire District Council (East Cambridgeshire District Council )

    I am writing on behalf of East Cambridgeshire District Council Local Planning Authority. It is my understanding the closest new element to East Cambridgeshire is the ecological mitigation area sited... Read more

  • Clarke and Simpson (Clarke and Simpson) on behalf of Ms Dyball, Ms Hall and S R Whitwell & Co (Ms Dyball, Ms Hall and S R Whitwell & Co)

    We refer to the 30 acres of land identified over 40 miles distant from the Sizewell C proposed development as compensatory fen meadow The applicant has not provided sufficent evidence that the land... Read more

  • Pakenham Parish Council (Pakenham Parish Council)

    Pakenham Parish Council produced a list of items considered important if the land in Pakenham is compulsory purchased by EDF. This list is attached (addendum 1). Subsequent to forwarding this list to... Read more

  • Suffolk Building Preservation Trust (Suffolk Building Preservation Trust)

    The Suffolk Building Preservation Trust owns Pakenham Water Mill, IP31 2NB, a Grade II listed building of national historic interest. The building is used for milling flour, the sales of which provide... Read more

  • Thintoe North (Thintoe North)

    I represent the County Council division that includes Pakenham and am not in a position to comment on the Sizewell C project as a whole but wish to focus on the proposals for a fen meadow at Pakenham.... Read more

  • Blue Marine Foundation (Blue Marine Foundation)

    The Blue Marine Foundation (BLUE) is an environmental charity based in London and has specialised in marine conservation works for the past decade. Together with other environmental NGOs BLUE... Read more

  • Manus Kyle

    I am writing to seek some assurances about the proposed development by EDF of the water meadow backing onto our property. I love our home and village and know how fortunate we are to be surrounded by... Read more

  • Gavin Adams

    We are writing to object to the proposed development by NNB Generation Company (SZC) Limited of the water meadow in Pakenham (Change 11). Our objections are summarised below: 1. Parts of the... Read more

  • West Suffolk District Council (West Suffolk District Council)

    To whom it may concern, As the representative Councillor of Pakenham for and on behalf of West Suffolk District Council, I have received a number of comments and concerns from residents in relation to... Read more