Skip to main content
Find a National Infrastructure Project

Beta This is a beta service - your feedback will help us to improve it

Navitus Bay Wind Park

Section 51 advice

The list below includes a record of advice we have provided for this project.

There is a statutory duty, under section 51 of the Planning Act 2008, around an application or potential application. This includes recording the name of the person who requested advice and the advice given. This information has to be made publicly available.

Search advice

Search by key words or the name of person the advice was given to.

Showing 1 to 50 of 187 documents, newest first.

Results per page View 25 results per page | 50 | View 100 results per page

  • View meeting with Navitus Bay Development Limited

    Feedback meeting between Navitus Bay Development Limited and the Planning Inspectorate following the Secretary of State?s decisions on the Navitus Bay Wind Park project.

    Meeting with: Navitus Bay Development Limited
    Date of meeting: 6 November 2015

  • View advice to PCBA

    A number of our Association members have asked whether, in view of the unprecedented interest in this project, in addition to recording on the PINS website that the ExA Report has been sent to SoS, it... Read more

    Enquiry from: PCBA
    Date advice given: 24 March 2015

  • View advice to Bill Hoodless

    I should be grateful if you will respond to the following process query concerning the review of the noise issue by ExA. All the evidence so far presented has been on the basis of the ETSU Simpli... Read more

    Enquiry from: Bill Hoodless
    Date advice given: 12 March 2015

  • View advice to Roy Pointer

    The PCBA team and member supporters have raised some questions that I agreed to send to you; I should be glad of your advice. 1. Will you and the PINS team still be able to answer questions after 1... Read more

    Enquiry from: Roy Pointer
    Date advice given: 11 March 2015

  • View advice to Bill Hoodless

    Question regarding the time the examination ends, and questions regarding ability to submit further documents after the final deadline today.

    Enquiry from: Bill Hoodless
    Date advice given: 10 March 2015

  • View advice to PCBA

    I see that this very large number of submissions for Deadline VII, yesterday, have today been placed on the PINS website. They include a huge amount of fresh information, especially from the Appl... Read more

    Enquiry from: PCBA
    Date advice given: 9 March 2015

  • View advice to John Sharpe

    Would like to respond to aplicant last submssion, specifically the applicants Appendix 13: Taddiford Gap further clarifications note

    Enquiry from: John Sharpe
    Date advice given: 9 March 2015

  • View advice to Freeths LLP

    See attached letter from Freeths LLP on behalf of Challenge Navitus

    Enquiry from: Freeths LLP
    Date advice given: 5 March 2015

  • View advice to Patrick Canavan

    I have been following the debate over the proposed Navitus Bay development very carefully. Not least because when I bought a house in the area recently this proposal came up on the local searches. I h... Read more

    Enquiry from: Patrick Canavan
    Date advice given: 24 February 2015

  • View advice to Roy Pointer

    As the examination has progressed and the ExA has managed to draw more information from the Applicant, our residents? community has experienced a growing concern and interest in what the project might... Read more

    Enquiry from: Roy Pointer
    Date advice given: 12 February 2015

  • View advice to Dorset County Council

    Dorset County Council responded to the Rule 17 letter issued by the Examining Authority on the 21 November 2014 requesting: ? A submission on the status and admissibility of the Turbine Area Mitigat... Read more

    Enquiry from: Dorset County Council
    Date advice given: 11 February 2015

  • View advice to PCBA

    As the Examination progresses, we continue to notice the wide disparity in the assessment of the noise implications of the proposal as between the Applicant and PCBA and others. The topic is complex b... Read more

    Enquiry from: PCBA
    Date advice given: 11 February 2015

  • View advice to Bill Hoodless

    Clarification on the provision of documents within the examination timetable.

    Enquiry from: Bill Hoodless
    Date advice given: 7 February 2015

  • View advice to Bournemouth Borough Council

    We appreciate that in order to expedite the procedure for major infrastructure developments it is important that timetables are set and adhered for the submission of relevant documents and representat... Read more

    Enquiry from: Bournemouth Borough Council
    Date advice given: 5 February 2015

  • View advice to Claire Coward

    Wishes to comment on the applicant, although is not an Interested Party.

    Enquiry from: Claire Coward
    Date advice given: 28 January 2015

  • View meeting with Local Authorities and NBDL

    Advice to Local authorities and the applicant involved in the Navitus Bay Wind park project in respect of s106 agreements, following a discussion at the issue specific hearing held 21 January 2015.

    Meeting with: Local Authorities and NBDL
    Date of meeting: 22 January 2015

  • View advice to John Lambon

    Question regarding the submission of more up to date visuals for the Turbine Area Mitigation Option, and whether the applicant will be asked to submit them.

    Enquiry from: John Lambon
    Date advice given: 22 January 2015

  • View advice to Angus Walker

    Please could you clarify whether the application now contains both the original turbine area and the turbine area mitigation option, or just the latter. If it contains both options, will the panel be... Read more

    Enquiry from: Angus Walker
    Date advice given: 15 January 2015

  • View advice to Mike Sanderson

    Further to the procedural decision by the Examining Authority can you please clarify the following points: - You have stated in point 1.1 ?the Examining Authority has decided that the Turbine Area... Read more

    Enquiry from: Mike Sanderson
    Date advice given: 15 January 2015

  • View advice to PCBA

    I am writing to express very considerable surprise that ExA has not invited Challenge Navitus, PCBA or their acoustic consultants to answer the questions set out in the Noise, Vibration and EMF sectio... Read more

    Enquiry from: PCBA
    Date advice given: 15 January 2015

  • View advice to Toby Parker

    Query regarding the Mitigation Option submitted by the applicant as Appendix 43 to their Deadline III submission.

    Enquiry from: Toby Parker
    Date advice given: 12 January 2015

  • View advice to Christchurch and East Dorset C

    See attached letter

    Enquiry from: Christchurch and East Dorset C
    Date advice given: 18 December 2014

  • View advice to PCBA

    1. IPs have received the PINS? letter of 21 November twice. Is the second letter a duplicate of the first please? 2. During the discussion towards the end of the hearing on Thursday 20 November, in ... Read more

    Enquiry from: PCBA
    Date advice given: 11 December 2014

  • View advice to Philip Collins

    See attached letter

    Enquiry from: Philip Collins
    Date advice given: 11 December 2014

  • View advice to PCBA

    I am writing following the recent meeting of PCBA Steering Group after the end of the two weeks of Issue Specific Hearings. Colleagues have become increasingly concerned at the way in which the inno... Read more

    Enquiry from: PCBA
    Date advice given: 11 December 2014

  • View advice to W D Frewing

    How can I make a personal submission to the Navitus Bay enquiry?

    Enquiry from: W D Frewing
    Date advice given: 20 November 2014

  • View advice to John Searle

    Query regarding how and when to submit a document into the examination that is not intended to be a new representation, but is additional information to assist the ExA.

    Enquiry from: John Searle
    Date advice given: 18 November 2014

  • View advice to Graeme Crouch

    I would like to ask a few questions about the Navitus Bay Examination. 1) When making submissions for the 5th November deadline is it acceptable to mix the category of submission within one document ... Read more

    Enquiry from: Graeme Crouch
    Date advice given: 4 November 2014

  • View advice to Challenge Navitus

    There has been an exceptional response to Deadline II, not least from the applicant, including new information that we would have expected to have been available pre-application when there was more ti... Read more

    Enquiry from: Challenge Navitus
    Date advice given: 29 October 2014

  • View advice to PCBA

    On behalf of PCBA I am writing to note the substantial volume of material that you have received by way of Written Reps. Our early review suggests this is an unprecedented volume with substantial p... Read more

    Enquiry from: PCBA
    Date advice given: 29 October 2014

  • View advice to Gerald Austin

    When the Jurassic Coast was given World Heritage status, by UNESCO the UK govt was charged with ensuring its status in perpetuity against massive industrial development. The proposed Wind Farm in Pool... Read more

    Enquiry from: Gerald Austin
    Date advice given: 28 October 2014

  • View advice to John Searle

    Could you clarify 3 points for me: a) I am already registered as an Interested Party. Does this allow me to attend the hearing scheduled for 22 January 2015 on Compulsory Acquisition ? b) ... Read more

    Enquiry from: John Searle
    Date advice given: 22 October 2014

  • View advice to Bournemouth Borough Council

    Query regarding the Issue Specific Hearings and how people can request to attend or speak. Ms Corrie also queried how people would know that they needed to submit a Written Representation or make a re... Read more

    Enquiry from: Bournemouth Borough Council
    Date advice given: 16 October 2014

  • View advice to P Dewhurst

    Query relating to a newspaper article.

    Enquiry from: P Dewhurst
    Date advice given: 8 October 2014

  • View advice to Clarissa Kindred

    Query regarding how to become an Interested Party.

    Enquiry from: Clarissa Kindred
    Date advice given: 30 September 2014

  • View advice to Bill Hoodless

    We have received from the Applicant a draft SOCG that is under consideration. Since there is the question of compulsory powers to consider, am I right in thinking this would be a suitable matter to tr... Read more

    Enquiry from: Bill Hoodless
    Date advice given: 22 September 2014

  • View advice to Alan Rayner

    Query relating to the use of Section 106 Agreements.

    Enquiry from: Alan Rayner
    Date advice given: 2 September 2014

  • View advice to Peter Fenning

    I have noted in your letter of 31st July that the Panel has decided to accept the submission of the technical annexes and has set a deadline of 6th October Would you please advise if within these s... Read more

    Enquiry from: Peter Fenning
    Date advice given: 29 August 2014

  • View advice to Roy Pointer

    PCBA has reviewed its approach to the Examination in light of your procedure letter dated 31 July. In that letter you request submissions before 1 September and I am sending you this note to cover th... Read more

    Enquiry from: Roy Pointer
    Date advice given: 29 August 2014

  • View advice to Challenge Navitus

    As we mentioned at our previous meeting, we will have video evidence to submit to the ExA during the Navitus Bay examination. This will require some fairly standard hardware, but it must be "High Def... Read more

    Enquiry from: Challenge Navitus
    Date advice given: 21 August 2014

  • View advice to Donia Gray

    Has information about this project been put on Face Book which would inform young 18 to 30 year old adults

    Enquiry from: Donia Gray
    Date advice given: 20 August 2014

  • View advice to New Forest District council

    In accordance with the requirements of the relevant legislation NFDC have worked hard with NBDL and others, notably the other landside LPA?s, to maximise common ground and deliver a mechanism that wil... Read more

    Enquiry from: New Forest District council
    Date advice given: 15 August 2014

  • View advice to New Forest District Council

    Request for submission of the LIR on 10 October rather than the deadline of 6 October as stated in the Rule 6 letter, this is due to timings around committee meetings and availability of key members.

    Enquiry from: New Forest District Council
    Date advice given: 15 August 2014

  • View advice to Richard Malton

    Please see attached TO correspondence

    Enquiry from: Richard Malton
    Date advice given: 14 August 2014

  • View advice to PCBA

    I am now writing as arranged with some queries and requests in order that we can contribute to smooth running of the Examination ? 1. One of the headings in Annex H of the Rule 6 letter for SOCG in... Read more

    Enquiry from: PCBA
    Date advice given: 14 August 2014

  • View advice to David Law

    Query enquiring when further comments will be requested to be submitted

    Enquiry from: David Law
    Date advice given: 1 August 2014

  • View advice to Challenge Navitus

    In preparation for written representations on the Navitus Bay wind farm, please would you tell me on what media you will accept large data files. It is impractical to email large files, so we may hav... Read more

    Enquiry from: Challenge Navitus
    Date advice given: 25 July 2014

  • View advice to Poole & Christchurch Bay Assoc

    Query relating to the submission of Written Representations, and to how they will know what sort of information to bring to any hearings.

    Enquiry from: Poole & Christchurch Bay Assoc
    Date advice given: 15 July 2014

  • View advice to Bournemouth Airport

    If the CAA are a statutory consultee does ODPM 01/2003 not apply which would result in Bournemouth Airport being a statutory consultee as that circular took the responsibility for safeguarding from th... Read more

    Enquiry from: Bournemouth Airport
    Date advice given: 9 July 2014

  • View advice to Alan Gray

    Query relating to whether The Planning Inspectorate can legally request that a Local Authority gets involved in the examination.

    Enquiry from: Alan Gray
    Date advice given: 4 July 2014