Filter
East Anglia ONE North Offshore Windfarm

Relevant representations (registration comments)

Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.

Showing 451 to 500 of 878 representations, newest first.

Results per page View 25 results per page | 50 | View 100 results per page

  • Anglian Energy Planning Alliance (Anglian Energy Planning Alliance)

    The Anglian Energy Planning Alliance objects to SPR’s proposals asset out in their DCO application on the following grounds. The AEPA works in support of many of the interested parties opposed to the... Read more

    Submitted by: Non-statutory organisations
    Date submitted: 24 January 2020

  • Anthony Lockwood

    - Cumulative impact on local communities of up to 7 energy projects - Suffolk's famous peace and tranquillity lost, noise pollution, air pollution How can the road infrastructure, with the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 January 2020

  • Carole Heath

    Cumulative impact on local communities of up to 7 energy projects Unsuitability of Thorpeness cliffs as site for landing cables Use of unspoilt countryside at Friston for complexes the size of Wembley... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 January 2020

  • Chris Askew

    My objection to this project are, Traffic on local roads. Air, light & noise pollution. Threat to wildlife and ANOB areas. Concertation of two many projects in one small area. Substations that will... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 January 2020

  • Chris Buckton

    I wish to object to this Scottish Power planning application for the following reasons : It involves the destruction of irreplaceable ancient woodland It severs the coast and heathland AONB disrupting... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 January 2020

  • Christopher Howes

    I object to this development for the reasons below. 1.It will have an adverse impact on the visual amenity of unspoilt Suffolk countryside. 2.The adverse impact of traffic,noise,pollution,loss of... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 January 2020

  • Christopher Wilson

    I am very much in favour of offshore wind farms, subject to them being located in the least environmentally damaging sites ie away from avian and marine feeding/nesting grounds, but my concerns here... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 January 2020

  • David Briggs

    - Cumulative impact on local communities of up to 7 energy projects - Unsuitability of Thorpeness Cliffs as site for landing cables - Use of unspoilt countryside at Friston for substation complexes... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 January 2020

  • David Villiers

    this proposal is completely inappropriate for the location as it is too big for the location disrupt an area of outstanding natural beauty destroy the landscape reduce tourist trade effecting one of... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 January 2020

  • David Whiffen

    I am a regular visitor to the Suffolk Heritage coast staying with my girlfriend's family who live near Friston. I do not object to offshore wind farms what I object to is the onshore installations... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 January 2020

  • Dr Rachel Herron

    We wish to object to the onshore works aspect of this Planning Application, specifically the proposed landfall at the holiday village of Thorpeness that has extremely fragile cliffs and the 11 km... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 January 2020

  • Edward Magee

    I fully support the representations being made by SAES and Friston Parish Council. The impact of this planning application will have a detrimental impact to village life, the peace and tranquility of... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 January 2020

  • Friston Parish Council (Friston Parish Council)

    INTRODUCTION The proposed developments (EA1N and EA2) will have a significant adverse impact on Friston and the surrounding area from the onshore elements of the schemes which involve the construction... Read more

    Submitted by: Parish councils
    Date submitted: 24 January 2020

  • Gabriel R O Lange

    Dear Examining Authority at the Planning Inspectorate, Re: East Anglia One North: While supporting the principle of renewable energy, I am apalled at this Scottish Power Renewables planning... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 January 2020

  • George Mabey

    - Cumulative impact on local communities of up to 7 energy projects - Unsuitability of Thorpeness Cliffs as site for landing cables - Use of unspoilt countryside at Friston for substation complexes... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 January 2020

  • Georgina Fitzherbert

    Dear Examining Authority, RE: EAST ANGLIA NORTH ONE (and EAST ANGLIA TWO) I wish to object to this ScottishPower Renewables planning application, for the following reasons: ? Cumulative impact on... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 January 2020

  • Gillian Harris

    I note the representations made by SASES and Friston Parish Council and support and personally agree with all the issues raised in their submission. The temporary loss of year old views and the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 January 2020

  • Graeme Murray

    I object to SPR’s proposals as expressed in their DCO application for the following reasons: As a resident of the village of Snape I can confirm that there has been no consultation by the applicant... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 January 2020

  • GreenSnape (GreenSnape)

    GreenSnape is an environment and wildlife conservation group based in Snape, Suffolk. We object to the proposals, and agree with the representations being made by Snape Parish Council, by Friston... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 January 2020

  • Historic England (Historic England )

    PINs Registration and Relevant Representation Form Section 56 Planning Act 2008 Date notified: 25 November 2019 Response deadline: 27 January 2020 Project: The Proposed East Anglia North ONE Offshore... Read more

    Submitted by: Other statutory consultees
    Date submitted: 24 January 2020

  • Jane Mcneill

    We do not object to offshore wind farms. We object to the onshoring of such capacity which causes despoliation to the countryside. SPR will construct one of the largest substations in Europe in the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 January 2020

  • Janette Redshaw

    Why do areas become listed as areas of AONB to protect them, then suddenly this will be ignored it makes a mockery of legislation The horrendous effect this will have on the Human population : noiise,... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 January 2020

  • Jemima Tindle

    I am writing to you with regards Scottish Power Renewables (SPR) planning application EA1N- PINS DCO application with regards the Friston Substation and register as an interested party. I wish to... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 January 2020

  • Jennifer Wilson

    I fully support offshore wind farms as long as they are not sited in an area which is detrimental to wildlife. However I believe in order to keep public support it is imperative that the onshore... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 January 2020

  • Joanna Jastrzembska

    - Cumulative impact on local communities of up to 7 energy projects - Unsuitability of Thorpeness Cliffs as site for landing cables - Use of unspoilt countryside at Friston for substation complexes... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 January 2020

  • John Davies

    Scottish Power Renewables I am registering this objection to the Scottish Power Renewables application to construct a large electrical substation on land near Friston and connect this to the National... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 January 2020

  • John Dawson

    I object to the proposed construction for the following reasons. 1. The short and long term destruction of a beautiful and productive landscape is excessive as there are alternative locations and... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 January 2020

  • John Duke

    -- my major concern is the cumulative impact on the immediate area where I live, in Aldringham, of up to 7 major projects developing over a considerable periold of years. -- we live at the junction of... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 January 2020

  • John Vandenberghe

    Dear Examining Authority Re East Anglia North One and Two I wish to object to this Scottish Power Renewables planning application for the following reasons 1 Like many of our neighbours here in... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 January 2020

  • Jonathan Woolley

    1 The proposed route through Aldeburgh is totally unsuitable for large volumes of traffic. Pedestrians cross in numerous places. The road is narrow in parts, and traffic going in opposite directions... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 January 2020

  • KWS Ashurst

    Dear Sir or Madam, I wish to object to this ScottishPower Renewables planning application for the following reasons: 1) The cumulative, deleterious impact upon local communities of up to 7 energy... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 January 2020

  • Lin Patrick

    I am concerned about this proposal for the following reasons: INCREASED TRAFFIC. The A1094, B1069, B1121 &B1122 are at best single carriageway roads or just narrow lanes or by-roads. All these will be... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 January 2020

  • Lorraine Hubbard

    I wish to express my objections to the Scottish Power Renewables planning application for the following reasons: • It is clear that such a development will badly affect both tourism and wildlife in... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 January 2020

  • Marine Management Organisation (Marine Management Organisation)

    Dear Sir/Madam, East Anglia ONE North Offshore Windfarm The Marine Management Organisation (MMO) is an interested party for the examination of Development Consent Order (DCO) applications for... Read more

    Submitted by: Other statutory consultees
    Date submitted: 24 January 2020
    Contains attachment(s)

  • Mark Hopkins

    Dear Sir/Madam, I am writing to vehemently object to the current development proposals because of the location at which the cables are currently proposed to be brought onshore i.e., at the Thorpeness... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 January 2020

  • Michael Doy

    I wish to object to this Scottish Power Renewables planning application for the following reasons. 1)The cumulative impact of having six of these sequential industrial energy developments running in... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 January 2020

  • Michelle Keane

    I strongly object to the construction of a substation in Friston which will damage the whole area from the seashore to the substation. Why can't the substation be built in the sea?

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 January 2020

  • Mr A Noble

    Re East Anglia North One I wish to object to the Scottish Power Renewables planning application for the following reasons ; a. Clearly the application will be disasterous for the Suffolk coast and its... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 January 2020

  • Mr Feetham

    Dear Sirs, Re: EAST ANGLIA NORTH ONE I object to this Scottish Power Renewables planning application for the following reasons: This part of East Suffolk depends very heavily on its tourist industry.... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 January 2020

  • Mr Thomas O'Brien

    Dear Sirs, I am a resident from East Suffolk and I am opposed to the planned windfarm electrical distribution centre and underground cabling in Friston for the East Anglia Two and and One North... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 January 2020

  • Mrs Hilary Thorby

    As a frequent visitor to East Suffolk for RSPB Minsmere & the Suffolk coast in general, Snape Maltings & the village of Friston where I have close friends, I am appalled & horrified by the DCO... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 January 2020

  • Mrs Rosemary Fleet

    I am writing to support the representations made by SASES and Friston Parish Council . The proposed project will completely dominate Friston and our peaceful, rural idyll will be lost forever. The... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 January 2020

  • National Grid (National Grid)

    Dear Sir/Madam REPRESENTATION BY NATIONAL GRID ELECTRICITY TRANSMISSION PLC (“NGET”) TO THE EAST ANGLIA ONE NORTH OFFSHORE WINDFARM AND THE EAST ANGLIA TWO OFFSHORE WINDFARM DCOs NGET wishes to make a... Read more

    Submitted by: Other statutory consultees
    Date submitted: 24 January 2020

  • Nicholas Hubbard

    I wish to express my objections to the Scottish Power Renewables planning application for the following reasons: • It is clear that such a development will badly affect both tourism and wildlife in... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 January 2020

  • Nicky Corbett

    Good afternoon It is with great sadness that I see plans to decimate an area I have lived and grown up in all my life. I understand the need for renewable energy but I am at pains to understand why... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 January 2020

  • Nigel Strutt

    Dear Examining Authority, Re: EAST ANGLIA NORTH ONE (and EAST ANGLIA TWO) I wish to object to this ScottishPower Renewables planning application for the following reasons: The cumulative impact on... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 January 2020

  • Penny Robertson

    I am so saddened & shocked by this application & the plans for the area I have lived in for the last 25 years. * The unsuitability & fragility of Thorpeness Cliffs as a site for landing cables * The... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 January 2020

  • Peter Pledger

    Whilst I am very much in favour of wind farms, and other forms of renewable energy, I object to the onshore element of this Scottish Power Renewables planning application. • It seems to be completely... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 January 2020

  • Simon Ward on behalf of Petula Ward

    Dear sir,Concerning the substation at grove road friston. My parents petula [Redacted] live at [Redacted] If this goes ahead( no doubt minds have been made up by now anyway) the values of the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 January 2020

  • Public Health England (Public Health England)

    Thank you for your consultation regarding the above development. Public Health England (PHE) welcomes the opportunity to comment on your proposals at this stage of the project and can confirm that:... Read more

    Submitted by: Other statutory consultees
    Date submitted: 24 January 2020