Rampion 2 Offshore Wind Farm

Relevant representations (registration comments)

Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.

Showing 101 to 150 of 425 representations, newest first.

Results per page View 25 results per page | 50 | View 100 results per page

  • Lorraine Robinson-Brown

    Whilst I support the need for cleaner energy, I must take issue with the size, scale and sighting of the Rampion 2 development. At around 8 miles It is much too close to our coastline. If these are to... Read more

  • ROBERT MARTIN WHITELAW

    I wish to object strongly to Rampion 2 Offshore Wind Farm. I am in favour of offshore wind farms and had no objection to Rampion 1, but the height of the proposed turbines just 8 miles offshore is... Read more

  • Ronald Alan Leggett

    There are already long queues of traffic travelling West into Cowfold Village every morning and evening with very many Heavy Good Vehicles. plus vehicles stopping for any more than a few minutes such... Read more

  • Sarah Patton

    The sheer scale of the scheme in environmentally sensitive inshore waters with a cleared transmission right-of-way through a National Park will disrupt and permanently degrade ecosystems in the sea,... Read more

  • Sheelah Baines

    This is one of very few unspoilt coastal areas in the south east with far reaching views. There are also many migrating birds. The enormous turbines will be extremely detrimental especially in the... Read more

  • Derrick Chester

    I am registering to express my support for the proposal. In terms of the mitigation I note it is proposed to bring the cabling ashore at Climping Beach. It should be noted Climping Beach and its... Read more

  • Robert William Gale

    I do not support the Rampion 2 Infrastructure Project. My concerns are in the following areas - 1.Location This is clearly not the best location for a windfarm. At best the winds can be considered... Read more

  • Terence Ellis

    The Rampion 2 Application (for a wind farm in the sea off West Sussex) ignores the UK Government’s strategic environmental advice to provide visual buffers for very large turbines. That is a primary... Read more

  • Aldwick Parish Council (Aldwick Parish Council)

    The Parish Council is an interested party in terms of representing residents' views: There are concerns over the scale of the proposals and visual impacts affecting Aldwick residents, and with the... Read more

  • Francis John Rodney Brown

    The central point of this Comment is that continued protection of the South Downs National Park and the Seven Sisters Heritage Coast should be a Principal Issue in this process. The proposal has a... Read more

  • John INVERDALE

    I feel this development is contrary Government guidelines that projects on this scale should be 14 miles from shore, and am also very concerned about the effect on the South Downs National Park in... Read more

  • Lawrence Haas

    My registration comment is made in association with Protect Coastal Sussex (PCS) which is a voluntary affiliation of community organisations and residents along the south coast and project-affected... Read more

  • Patricia Donaldson

    I don’t know how a project can be passed when the plans are not detailed so you can see them. It seems to be hidden which is not right

  • Peter Fairhall

    Destruction of wildlife rich countryside. Extra traffic, noise and disruption for many years. Safety worries on such a busy main route.

  • Richard Napier Luce

    1. Dragon’s Lane: This is a private unmade up lane with six houses. Rampion propose to use it for ‘operational access’ only. We have had assurances that there is no intention of using HGVs which would... Read more

  • Brooke S Essapen

    I am strongly opposed to the Rampion 2 Offshore Wind Farm. My main objection is the inefficiency of the location as well as the environmental impact. There are many other sites around the UK,... Read more

  • Ian West

    We live on the sea on Middleton on Sea beach. The wind farm proposed would be directly in our view. There is no need to have it so high or so close to the coast that the sea views will be impacted for... Read more

  • John Briggs

    I live on rustington foreshore and rampion 2 will significantly impact the coastline landscape due to size of structures since rampion 1 I have noticed a significant amount of chalk washing up on our... Read more

  • Nicholas Maslin

    Too close to the land, having a detrimental effect on tourism, marine leisure activities, wildlife and fishing. The land link will destroy a large area of the South Downs National Park, for decades to... Read more

  • RICHARD BAILEY

    I have attended a presentation by RWE on the Rampion 2 project and have studied their plans quite thoroughly. The key issues that were raised at the meeting by opponents were NOT properly answered by... Read more

  • Elizabeth Anne Leggett

    I object to the proposals. I agree with the views expressed by CowfoldvRampion , our community action group, and support the evidence they will provide. Traffic and Pollution in Cowfold Traffic in... Read more

  • John Marston

    To express my deep felt concerns over Rampion 2 from an environmental point of view.

  • Littlehampton Heritage Group (Littlehampton Heritage Group)

    The Rampion 2 Application ignores the UK Government’s strategic environmental advice to provide visual buffers for very large turbines. That is a primary mitigation and safeguard against unacceptable... Read more

  • Maritime and Coastguard Agency (Maritime and Coastguard Agency)

    MCA will be responding to the ExA on matters concerning the safety of maritime navigation and maritime emergency response. MCA will provide comments on the Navigation Risk Assessment, Shipping &... Read more

  • Mark Renny

    DCO for application of the Rampion2 Offshore Wind Farm. Representation by Mark Renny, Director of Brookside Holiday Camp Limited, Lyminster Road, Lyminster, Littlehampton, West Sussex. BN17 7QE I am... Read more

  • Protectcoastalsussex.org (Protectcoastalsussex.org)

    Relevant to EN-1,Section 1.1.4, [REDACTED] (PCS) will offer argument and evidence that the local impacts of Rampion 2 would result in “adverse impacts from the development outweigh benefits” . It is... Read more

  • Steven Gibbs

    As a caravan owner on the site next to the planned access road for the development I wish to object to the road next to the caravan park. I bought a van on this site for the quiet, relaxed feel of the... Read more

  • Brian Bradley

    1. The Location: Whilst I fully support the need to bring on stream more renewable energy, wind farms need to located with sensitivity to the amenity and landscape of the local area. It is important... Read more

  • Denise Lee

    This appalling project beggars belief in the supposition that it will benefit the UK and West Sussex in particular. An investment of £3Bn+ that has a projected efficiency of 35% meaning that it will... Read more

  • East Beach Residents Association (EBRA) - Littlehampton (East Beach Residents Association (EBRA) - Littlehampton)

    I have registered on behalf of the East Beach Residents Association. Members have a number of concerns over the Rampion 2 Project. ? It is considered the size of the proposed turbines, much larger... Read more

  • Edwin William David Stokes

    Dear Sirs, I would like to register my concern about the new Rampion 2 wind farm as a full time fisherman of the past 40 years based in Chichester harbour, I have fished the seas off Selsey and... Read more

  • Esther Patricia Ann Hedwig Graham

    My comment is the Rampion 2 Application takes little account of the many adverse impacts on local residents living on the coastal strip along the populated Sussex Bay inshore from the western extent... Read more

  • Mark Andrew Whitcombe

    My main concern is over the siting of this proposed development. It is too close to the coastline rather than being truly offshore, the proposed construction is also so large it is going to have... Read more

  • Steven Blower

    Our caravan is close to the northern border of the holiday park and as such will be close to the service road which is proposed as part of the Rampion 2 wind farm. We agree with the need for more... Read more

  • The Crown Estate (The Crown Estate)

    The Crown Estate requests to be registered as an Interested Party in the examination of the Rampion 2 Offshore Wind Farm. Our interest in the project is that Rampion Extension Development Limited... Read more

  • Alan Sutton

    I feel Rampion did not engage adequately with Cowfold residents about the project, including it’s exact location or the impact it would have on local infrastructure, traffic, pollution etc and failed... Read more

  • CowfoldvRampion (CowfoldvRampion)

    We have submitted evidence to demonstrate that the local community of Cowfold was not consulted about the proposed substation being located at Oakendene, Cowfold. Furthermore, the decision was made... Read more

  • Deborah Jane Miles

    My main concerns is the increase traffic and pollution on the A272 running from Oakedene and Cowfold. Pollution is already extremly high in this area, with increase traffic from trucks can only make... Read more

  • Littlehampton Resident (Littlehampton Resident) on behalf of Edward Stratton Woodward (Edward Stratton Woodward)

    I object to the proposed Rampion 2 development. Concerns I wish to register are that many people in my community who are actually aware of what is proposed in the Application documents disagree with... Read more

  • Eric Norman Smith

    Trawling has been banned up to 4 kilometers off the West Sussex Coast for 3 years now to give the ecosystem a chance to recover from the deverstating effects of inshore trawling and help the... Read more

  • Geraldine Huggett

    Increased traffic causing huge chaos in and around Cowfold Destruction of habitat for newts, bats, frogs, nightingales and many other species Destruction of the village of Cowfold, turning it into an... Read more

  • Hannah Russell-Smith

    I object to the proposals. I agree with the views expressed by CowfoldvRampion, our community action group, and support the evidence they will provide in Written Representations and verbally at... Read more

  • Isabella Russell-Smith

    I object to the proposals. I agree with the views expressed by CowfoldvRampion, our community action group, and support the evidence they will provide in Written Representations and verbally at... Read more

  • Jeremy Smethurst

    I strongly object to the Rampion 2 proposals for the Oakendene substation. As a resident affected by the project, I did not know anything about it until I received a Section 42 letter in October 2022.... Read more

  • Kathleen Carson

    Green Energy when generated efficiently and cost effectively is to be embraced. This proposed project does not achieve either of these two objectives. Extending the pre existing windfarm off the south... Read more

  • Lynne Sorrell

    I am extremely concerned about the impact on traffic & air pollution through the village of Cowfold for the duration of this project. The A272 is already busy and often congested with traffic queuing... Read more

  • Mark Lower

    Location and size of proposed sub station and associated traffic congestion.

  • Martin Bugler

    I have grave concerns on the impact of an already extremely busy A272 that has many accidents over the course of the year being further impacted not only by extra traffic but the inevitability of that... Read more

  • Mary C Woolcock

    I strongly object to this proposal. Subsequent to the consultation, proposals and information has materially changed. The village was not properly consulted in the first place. Rampions proposal is... Read more

  • Maurice Huggett

    Increase in traffic on the A272 which is already under strain, Cowfold double roundabouts will be gridlocked bringing an increase in accidents ,local single track lanes will be used as a substitute... Read more