Filter
West Burton Solar Project

Relevant representations (registration comments)

Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.

Showing 301 to 325 of 354 representations, newest first.

Results per page 25 | View 50 results per page | View 100 results per page

  • Rachael White

    I do not agree that more of our vital green space should be used for solar energy. It should be preserved for wildlife habitat and food production. If solar is needed and available it can easily be... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 7 June 2023

  • Simon Jeremy Parker

    I strongly object to the proposed West Burton Solar Project. As this is one of four current proposals in this area, and due to their proximity to one another, then I feel this should absolutely be... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 7 June 2023

  • Stuart James Menzies

    FROM: STUART MENZIES TO: NATIONAL INFRASTRUCTURE PLANNING??OBJECTIONS TO THE INSTALLATION OF SOLAR FARMS ON UP TO 10000 ACRES OF LINCOLNSHIRE FARMLAND?? 1. GENERAL COMMENTS These solar farms should... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 7 June 2023

  • Susan North

    Concerned about loss of agricultural land, visual impact, battery storage

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 7 June 2023

  • Adam Sissons

    Why has lincolnshire been selected as the coverage area for solar projects? Why have solar projects been prioritised over wind farms? Wind farms can generate more power than required hence why they... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 8 June 2023

  • Adrian Saddler

    This project and the other 3 nsip proposed are an abomination which would be utterly destroy farmland,the environment,wildlife,heritage sites,roads,our lives . It is simply the most unacceptable... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 8 June 2023

  • Anne Parkin

    Relevant Representation West Burton Solar Project: This relevant representation is the joint work by us as a couple, so we will be submitting it twice (separately). We moved to this area just before... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 8 June 2023

  • Canal & River Trust (Canal & River Trust)

    The Canal & River Trust have submitted on 8th June 2023 by email to PINS our Relevant Representation in response to this project, along with draft Protective Provisions and the Trust’s letter seeking... Read more

    Submitted by: Non-statutory organisations
    Date submitted: 8 June 2023
    Contains attachment(s)

  • Chris Sneath

    Loss of high grade agricultural land for food industry. The amount of solar applications for Lincolnshire and the effect this is having on local residents mental health. Concerns of safety over... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 8 June 2023

  • Dave Laing

    Opposition to the inadequately thought out proposal to swap premium agricultural land for a brown field low yield solar project that will not produce anywhere near the energy output as advertised

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 8 June 2023

  • David Hunt

    Relevant Representation Points West Burton Solar Project Dear Sir/ Madam I would like to express my strong opposition to the proposal for a multiple of reasons. Part one general concerns 1. Projects... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 8 June 2023
    Contains attachment(s)

  • Pat Mitchell on behalf of Drew Mitchell (Drew Mitchell)

    Although my observations and objections relate to Island Green Power West Burton 1, 2 and 3 (2,484 acres), it is vital that I draw to the Planning Inspectorate’s notice three further solar projects;... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 8 June 2023

  • Eleonore Middleton

    I object to this proposal on several grounds. It will be set on fully viable farmland. In a time of food shortages and obvious lack of food security in this country to destroy food producing land is... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 8 June 2023

  • Elizabeth Anne Showell

    Why have no other options been considered that do not impact on productive agricultural land ? Has a wildlife impact been undertaken ? The traffic during Consuelo have a huge adverse impact on local... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 8 June 2023

  • Elizabeth Clare Garbutt

    1. The West Burton Solar Project (WBSP) is only one of four Solar NSIP proposals in the District of West Lindsey, Lincolnshire. 2. The number, scale and impact of all four proposed projects in the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 8 June 2023

  • Gary Rothwell

    I strongly object to the proposed West Burton Solar Project. As this is one of four current proposals in this area, and due to their proximity to one another, then I feel this should absolutely be... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 8 June 2023

  • Geoffrey Middleton

    I object to this proposal on several grounds. It will be set on fully viable farmland. In a time of food shortages and obvious lack of food security in this country to destroy food producing land is... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 8 June 2023

  • Guy Hodgkinson

    Much like everyone in the Broxholme area the idea in theory of the West Burton Power Plant Regeneration is interesting in moving the UK off fossil fuels. The impact of solar panels and this plant at... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 8 June 2023

  • Harriet Currie

    The loss of our countryside to this huge solar farm is unacceptable. These projects are huge and will seriously impact the local community, the majority of who have moved to rural villages to enjoy a... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 8 June 2023

  • Helen Mitchell

    I strongly object to this project as this will be a huge blight on the countryside in which I live. I choose to live in the countryside for the simple reason it is the countryside. If I wanted to live... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 8 June 2023

  • James Arden

    This is not a single application, it is a vast amalgamation of at least 4 currently, and potentially many more in the pipeline. Therefore to comment on this in isolation is simply bureaucratic... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 8 June 2023

  • Jennifer Mary Williams

    Prime agricultural land will be lost.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 8 June 2023

  • John Parkin

    Relevant Representation West Burton Solar Project: This relevant representation is the joint work by us as a couple, so we will be submitting it twice (separately). We moved to this area just before... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 8 June 2023

  • Jonathan Waudby

    Appaling waste of good farm land vital in the production of food for UK sustainability. The technology is not yet efficient enough to get the full benefit of taking the vast amount of land out of... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 8 June 2023

  • Joyce Bell

    It is so unnecessary as we could all have solar on our roofs saving much needed land for food growing. The environment you would use is so rich for wildlife and of special landscape that has been... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 8 June 2023