Filter
AQUIND Interconnector

Relevant representations (registration comments)

Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.

Showing 1 to 25 of 211 representations, newest first.

Results per page 25 | View 50 results per page | View 100 results per page

  • Irene Jay

    Will the inter connector have an adverse affect on the location where I live and will the surrounding area suffer environmental damage?

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 2 January 2020

  • Peter Evans

    The primary area of my concern is the route of the proposed interconnector, especially through the Milton area of Portsmouth. This is in relation to the inconvenience in the construction/installation... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 2 January 2020

  • Corporation of Trinity House (Corporation of Trinity House)

    Dear Sir / Madam We refer to the above application for development consent in respect of the Aquind Interconnector Trinity House is the General Lighthouse Authority for England, Wales, the Channel... Read more

    Submitted by: Other statutory consultees
    Date submitted: 3 January 2020

  • Hambledon Parish Council (Hambledon Parish Council)

    Hambledon PC believes that it is important to represent the interests of the residents of the Parish, since they will inevitably be affected by road access issues during installation of the... Read more

    Submitted by: Parish councils
    Date submitted: 3 January 2020

  • Portsmouth Water Ltd (Portsmouth Water Ltd)

    We will be formally responding the the Draft DCO proposals by the deadline set. Our comments and recommendations will cover Land Contamination and groundwater protection to safe guard Portsmouth... Read more

    Submitted by: Other statutory consultees
    Date submitted: 3 January 2020
    Contains attachment(s)

  • James Veryard

    Our home is 8m from the proposed cable, my wife has a [] with is effected by magnetic fields, plus Aquind failed to answer some of my concerns. Eg. noise (buzz) from cable, effect on house prices.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 4 January 2020

  • John Cross

    I spent many years working in the Electricity Supply Industry and am acutely aware of the need for a secure and reliable energy supply. I believe this outweighs all other considerations.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 5 January 2020

  • Jackie Stevens

    The Aquind proposal has an impact on where I reside. The proposal is to access a track to bring in the equipment which my garden overlooks. there is also an option that a telegraph pole in my garden... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 6 January 2020

  • Sport England (Sport England)

    Sport England has a statutory duty to protect playing field which has been used or last used within the last 5 years. We also have a non-statutory responsibility to protect existing sports facilities... Read more

    Submitted by: Non-statutory organisations
    Date submitted: 7 January 2020

  • Elaine Husselby

    Hello, I would like to object to the plans for the site off Locksway Road in the old St James' Hospital grounds. There will be so much disruption to the already busy, congested queued up roads, over... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 8 January 2020

  • Associated British Ports (Associated British Ports)

    Associated British Ports (ABP), in its capacity as statutory harbour authority for the Port of Southampton, has received correspondence from Aquind in relation to this project. ABP has been identified... Read more

    Submitted by: Non-statutory organisations
    Date submitted: 10 January 2020

  • Addleshaw Goddard LLP (Addleshaw Goddard LLP) on behalf of Southern Gas Networks Plc (Southern Gas Networks Plc)

    Application by AQUIND Limited (Promoter) for an Order Granting Development Consent for the AQUIND Interconnector (Order). Objection by Southern Gas Networks Plc (SGN). Addleshaw Goddard LLP acts on... Read more

    Submitted by: Other statutory consultees
    Date submitted: 10 January 2020

  • Martin Farrelly

    I disagree with the planned route for the interconnector. The plan is to take the cable corridor through the most densely populated city in the UK, outside of London. Portsmouth is a city that is... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 11 January 2020

  • Andy Parks

    I refer to the Aquind Interconnector application to which I would like to make a representation on the following grounds: 1. There is no provision for additional temporary parking in lieu of the loss... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 13 January 2020

  • Barry Scott

    The AQUIND proposal is based upon siting two six/seven storey buildings on some 9 acres of land in the middle of farming country, with close proximity to the South Downs National Park. In order to... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 13 January 2020

  • Michael Johnson

    I wish to object to Aquind's choice of landing spot insomuch as they have chosen to make landfall on the most densely populated Island in the UK and will cause massive traffic upheaval on one of the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 13 January 2020

  • Brenda Lock

    I cannot believe that anyone could think it was a good idea to bring the cables through one of the most congested cities in the country. There are so many alternatives so why make life even more... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 15 January 2020

  • RWE Renewables UK Limited (RWE Renewables UK Limited)

    The proposed route for the marine cables of the Aquind Interconnector crosses the proposed Rampion Extension offshore wind farm site. It is noted that the routeing criteria outlined in the... Read more

    Submitted by: Non-statutory organisations
    Date submitted: 15 January 2020

  • Brian Hill

    I am a landowner within the Primary Consultation Zone Height of the two proposed connector halls at 22-26 metres will change character of area from rural to industrial and harm the visual setting... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 16 January 2020

  • Eastleigh Borough Council (Eastleigh Borough Council)

    As a neighbouring Local Authority we would like to register as an interested party in order to keep track of the application and assess any impacts on our local residents, which are likely to be... Read more

    Submitted by: Local authorities
    Date submitted: 16 January 2020

  • National Federation of Fishermen (National Federation of Fishermen)

    The following is offered in response to the submitted application documents: Fisheries Liaison and Coexistence Plan It is noted that a number of fisheries mitigation measures have been identified... Read more

    Submitted by: Non-statutory organisations
    Date submitted: 16 January 2020

  • Mrs Louise Baker

    I am worried about the effects for the Aquind interconnector that has now been accepted for examination by the planning Inspectorate. I believe this will not be examined locally and I have grave... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 20 January 2020

  • The Parish Council of Newlands (The Parish Council of Newlands)

    The route chosen for the cables and if an alternative, less disruptive route is available The disruption to traffic and residents during the installation of cables The heat emissions once cables are... Read more

    Submitted by: Parish councils
    Date submitted: 20 January 2020

  • Susan Cox

    My submissions will include comments on: The need for the interconnector The positioning of the interconnector and why it has to be placed in the countryside and not nearer to landfall or on an... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 21 January 2020

  • Guy Shepherd

    If allowed I am concerned at the following: 1 - The noise from the substation in a particularly quiet area and its impact on the community and SDNPA from the transformers and cooling equipment. 2 -... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 January 2020