Filter
AQUIND Interconnector

Relevant representations (registration comments)

Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.

Showing 1 to 50 of 211 representations, newest first.

Results per page View 25 results per page | 50 | View 100 results per page

  • Irene Jay

    Will the inter connector have an adverse affect on the location where I live and will the surrounding area suffer environmental damage?

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 2 January 2020

  • Peter Evans

    The primary area of my concern is the route of the proposed interconnector, especially through the Milton area of Portsmouth. This is in relation to the inconvenience in the construction/installation... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 2 January 2020

  • Corporation of Trinity House (Corporation of Trinity House)

    Dear Sir / Madam We refer to the above application for development consent in respect of the Aquind Interconnector Trinity House is the General Lighthouse Authority for England, Wales, the Channel... Read more

    Submitted by: Other statutory consultees
    Date submitted: 3 January 2020

  • Hambledon Parish Council (Hambledon Parish Council)

    Hambledon PC believes that it is important to represent the interests of the residents of the Parish, since they will inevitably be affected by road access issues during installation of the... Read more

    Submitted by: Parish councils
    Date submitted: 3 January 2020

  • Portsmouth Water Ltd (Portsmouth Water Ltd)

    We will be formally responding the the Draft DCO proposals by the deadline set. Our comments and recommendations will cover Land Contamination and groundwater protection to safe guard Portsmouth... Read more

    Submitted by: Other statutory consultees
    Date submitted: 3 January 2020
    Contains attachment(s)

  • James Veryard

    Our home is 8m from the proposed cable, my wife has a [] with is effected by magnetic fields, plus Aquind failed to answer some of my concerns. Eg. noise (buzz) from cable, effect on house prices.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 4 January 2020

  • John Cross

    I spent many years working in the Electricity Supply Industry and am acutely aware of the need for a secure and reliable energy supply. I believe this outweighs all other considerations.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 5 January 2020

  • Jackie Stevens

    The Aquind proposal has an impact on where I reside. The proposal is to access a track to bring in the equipment which my garden overlooks. there is also an option that a telegraph pole in my garden... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 6 January 2020

  • Sport England (Sport England)

    Sport England has a statutory duty to protect playing field which has been used or last used within the last 5 years. We also have a non-statutory responsibility to protect existing sports facilities... Read more

    Submitted by: Non-statutory organisations
    Date submitted: 7 January 2020

  • Elaine Husselby

    Hello, I would like to object to the plans for the site off Locksway Road in the old St James' Hospital grounds. There will be so much disruption to the already busy, congested queued up roads, over... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 8 January 2020

  • Associated British Ports (Associated British Ports)

    Associated British Ports (ABP), in its capacity as statutory harbour authority for the Port of Southampton, has received correspondence from Aquind in relation to this project. ABP has been identified... Read more

    Submitted by: Non-statutory organisations
    Date submitted: 10 January 2020

  • Addleshaw Goddard LLP (Addleshaw Goddard LLP) on behalf of Southern Gas Networks Plc (Southern Gas Networks Plc)

    Application by AQUIND Limited (Promoter) for an Order Granting Development Consent for the AQUIND Interconnector (Order). Objection by Southern Gas Networks Plc (SGN). Addleshaw Goddard LLP acts on... Read more

    Submitted by: Other statutory consultees
    Date submitted: 10 January 2020

  • Martin Farrelly

    I disagree with the planned route for the interconnector. The plan is to take the cable corridor through the most densely populated city in the UK, outside of London. Portsmouth is a city that is... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 11 January 2020

  • Andy Parks

    I refer to the Aquind Interconnector application to which I would like to make a representation on the following grounds: 1. There is no provision for additional temporary parking in lieu of the loss... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 13 January 2020

  • Barry Scott

    The AQUIND proposal is based upon siting two six/seven storey buildings on some 9 acres of land in the middle of farming country, with close proximity to the South Downs National Park. In order to... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 13 January 2020

  • Michael Johnson

    I wish to object to Aquind's choice of landing spot insomuch as they have chosen to make landfall on the most densely populated Island in the UK and will cause massive traffic upheaval on one of the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 13 January 2020

  • Brenda Lock

    I cannot believe that anyone could think it was a good idea to bring the cables through one of the most congested cities in the country. There are so many alternatives so why make life even more... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 15 January 2020

  • RWE Renewables UK Limited (RWE Renewables UK Limited)

    The proposed route for the marine cables of the Aquind Interconnector crosses the proposed Rampion Extension offshore wind farm site. It is noted that the routeing criteria outlined in the... Read more

    Submitted by: Non-statutory organisations
    Date submitted: 15 January 2020

  • Brian Hill

    I am a landowner within the Primary Consultation Zone Height of the two proposed connector halls at 22-26 metres will change character of area from rural to industrial and harm the visual setting... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 16 January 2020

  • Eastleigh Borough Council (Eastleigh Borough Council)

    As a neighbouring Local Authority we would like to register as an interested party in order to keep track of the application and assess any impacts on our local residents, which are likely to be... Read more

    Submitted by: Local authorities
    Date submitted: 16 January 2020

  • National Federation of Fishermen (National Federation of Fishermen)

    The following is offered in response to the submitted application documents: Fisheries Liaison and Coexistence Plan It is noted that a number of fisheries mitigation measures have been identified... Read more

    Submitted by: Non-statutory organisations
    Date submitted: 16 January 2020

  • Mrs Louise Baker

    I am worried about the effects for the Aquind interconnector that has now been accepted for examination by the planning Inspectorate. I believe this will not be examined locally and I have grave... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 20 January 2020

  • The Parish Council of Newlands (The Parish Council of Newlands)

    The route chosen for the cables and if an alternative, less disruptive route is available The disruption to traffic and residents during the installation of cables The heat emissions once cables are... Read more

    Submitted by: Parish councils
    Date submitted: 20 January 2020

  • Susan Cox

    My submissions will include comments on: The need for the interconnector The positioning of the interconnector and why it has to be placed in the countryside and not nearer to landfall or on an... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 21 January 2020

  • Guy Shepherd

    If allowed I am concerned at the following: 1 - The noise from the substation in a particularly quiet area and its impact on the community and SDNPA from the transformers and cooling equipment. 2 -... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 January 2020

  • Joint Nature Conservation Committee (Joint Nature Conservation Committee)

    JNCC are a public body that advises the UK government and devolved administrations on UK-wide nature conservation. In terms of this application, we will be advising on the nature conservation impacts... Read more

    Submitted by: Non-statutory organisations
    Date submitted: 24 January 2020
    Contains attachment(s)

  • Karen Holden-Craufurd

    Registering as an interested party as the proposed cable route from Anmore Road to the interconnector site may possibly be running along the other side of my boundary and that of Salt Box Barn. If the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 26 January 2020

  • CPRE Hampshire (CPRE Hampshire)

    This Representation summarises the position of CPRE Hampshire We consider that specific and relevant policies clearly indicate that a Development Consent Order should be refused for the reasons set... Read more

    Submitted by: Non-statutory organisations
    Date submitted: 29 January 2020

  • David Jeffery

    Objection Dramatic impact on the local area both visual and audible especially around the Lovedean area Major disruption to the road networks along the cable route and major effect on local... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 30 January 2020

  • Eversheds Sutherland (International) LLP on behalf of National Grid Electricity Transmission Plc (National Grid Electricity Transmission Plc )

    Representation by National Grid Electricity Transmission Plc and National Grid Gas Plc (together “National Grid”) Application by Aquind Limited for an Order Granting Development Consent for the AQUIND... Read more

    Submitted by: Non-statutory organisations
    Date submitted: 30 January 2020

  • Eversheds Sutherland (International) LLP (Clare Shaw-Carter) on behalf of National Grid Gas Plc (National Grid Gas Plc)

    Representation by National Grid Electricity Transmission Plc and National Grid Gas Plc (together “National Grid”) Application by Aquind Limited for an Order Granting Development Consent for the AQUIND... Read more

    Submitted by: Non-statutory organisations
    Date submitted: 30 January 2020

  • Mrs. Jane Carter

    I object to the laying of the HV electricity cables within and outside the Portsmouth boundary as proposed by Aquind. There is a real danger of radiation from the cables up through the ground if these... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 1 February 2020

  • Peter Crockett

    I live in a house which will be close to the route the cable will be taking. 1. I would like to be kept informed about how far away the cable will be. 2. I would like to know how the possibility of... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 3 February 2020

  • Alistair Thompson

    Dear Sir, I am writing to you about the proposed Aquind Interconnector, which will land in Portsmouth. The proposals and lack of public consultation are causing significant concern to residents along... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 4 February 2020
    Contains attachment(s)

  • Horndean Parish Council (Horndean Parish Council)

    The Parish Council would like to repeat its request that an effective traffic management plan is produced and then managed to minimise the disruption to traffic in Horndean and in particular, to... Read more

    Submitted by: Parish councils
    Date submitted: 4 February 2020

  • N Craise

    Whilst I have many concerns about the route of the proposed cable through Portsmouth my main concern is with the suggested route from Bransbury Park to the allotments via Yeo Court. Yeo Court is... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 6 February 2020

  • The Crown Estate (The Crown Estate)

    The Crown Estate manages property and rights which are owned by Her Majesty in right of the Crown. This portfolio includes around half of the foreshore and almost the entire seabed out to 12 nautical... Read more

    Submitted by: Other statutory consultees
    Date submitted: 7 February 2020

  • Mrs Susan Crossley

    My objections lie with the Con,vertor Station- - to the overall height of the building, inspite of being lowered into the surrounds , and its final visual impact on the landscape. - the effect of the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 8 February 2020

  • Jeremy Warren

    Our interest is essentially from a landscape aspect. What is proposed is a massive building, some 7 stories high, within the open countryside. If approved, the landscape impact is bound to be very... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 9 February 2020

  • Anne Atkinson

    I am writing as both a resident and the owner of a small business directly on the route of the Cable Corridor proposed by Aquind. I strongly disagree with the entire proposal to make landfall on... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 10 February 2020

  • J R Sykes Farms (J R Sykes Farms)

    AS THE TENANT OF WINCHESTER COLLEGE AT DENMEAD FARM, THE CABLING FOR THE INTERCONNECTOR WILL PASS THROUGH THE FARM WHICH I CURRENTLY FARM WITH ARABLE CROPS

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 10 February 2020

  • Veronica Knight

    1.Proposed route will cause excessive disruption to the east side of Portsmouth, already suffering from considerable traffic flow problems. 2.That the route could have been through a less densely... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 10 February 2020

  • APLEAL Action Group (APLEAL Action Group)

    APLEAL (Action to Protect the Living Environment Around Lovedean) is a community action group representing residents in Lovedean, where the proposed Aquind interconnector station will be located, and... Read more

    Submitted by: Non-statutory organisations
    Date submitted: 11 February 2020

  • Cllr Caroline Brook on behalf of Denmead and Newlands Residents

    Outreach of Consultation Location Carbon Footprint Long term Maintenance of Screening Impact on residents and local businesses Impact on school children Traffic management issues Options not properly... Read more

    Submitted by: Non-statutory organisations
    Date submitted: 11 February 2020

  • Patricia Conran

    I own a plot of grazing land measuring 1 1/2 acres in Broadway Lane, Lovedean. My land is used for grazing horses. Aquind are proposing to use 104 square metres of my land to plant hedging and to have... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 11 February 2020

  • Polly Beard

    I would like to register my interest as a resident living close to the proposed interconnector site and raise my objections to the Aquind project on the following grounds. Due to the sheer size of the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 11 February 2020

  • University of Portsmouth (University of Portsmouth)

    Aquind's proposed development route will have a significant impact on land and properties belonging to the University of Portsmouth. The current plans will cause disruption to the University’s... Read more

    Submitted by: Non-statutory organisations
    Date submitted: 11 February 2020

  • Judith Ann Clementson

    I am opposing the Aquind Limited's application for a DCO based the following reasons: - UK Statistical Information relating to energy consumption since 2000 - Climate Emergency and Strategic Planning... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 12 February 2020

  • South Downs National Park Authority (South Downs National Park Authority)

    The South Downs National Park borders the proposed location of the Convertor Station on three sides and in places it is just 200-300m from the National Park boundary. We would wish to participate in... Read more

    Submitted by: Local authorities
    Date submitted: 12 February 2020

  • Mr Patrick Whittle

    Please see attached

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 13 February 2020
    Contains attachment(s)