Skip to main content
Find a National Infrastructure Project

Beta This is a beta service - your feedback will help us to improve it

Filter
AQUIND Interconnector

Relevant representations (registration comments)

Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.

Showing 101 to 200 of 211 representations, newest first.

Results per page View 25 results per page | View 50 results per page | 100

  • Kelly Martin

    I totally object to this project to route the aquind cable through Miltom Portsmouth. It will bring chaos and disruption we do not need. Local people and wildlife will be affected by this. I have an... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 February 2020

  • Kelvin Pyne

    This would pass out side my house and l object strongly,totally unwarranted

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 February 2020

  • Kirstin Knowlson-clark

    I object to the aquind planning because of the following reasons Environmental impact on the local area. Milton Common is an area which supports many birds, foxes, and is an area of natural beauty... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 February 2020

  • Linda Williams

    I would like to lodge my objection to this project. The planned route will destroy a lot of open common ground. I was awful when permission was given to the water company to sink tanks in Bransbury... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 February 2020

  • Lois Marshall

    I strongly object to the proposal which I believe will damage the environment, cause unacceptable traffic chaos and cause the quality of life for the local population to be unacceptable fore many... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 February 2020

  • Lorraine Willis

    Disruption to my area.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 February 2020

  • Louisa Newport

    I am verh concerned about the route, the lack of adequate condultation and consuderstion of local residents, businesses and effect on environment.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 February 2020

  • Lynn Mills

    I wish to object to the AQUIND interconnector for various reasons. As a local resident I object to the way the whole process has been handled, we have only resently been made aware of the proposed... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 February 2020

  • Lynne Lush

    I wish to register my many objections to this AQUIND Interconnector proposal. I feel distrust and anger towards the application that has been put forward. The complete lack of information over the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 February 2020

  • Lynsey Christopher

    I intend to notify of my objections to this plan. Apologies my RR didn’t contain enough information, the form wasn’t clear - I thought I would be asked for more details at a later stage. Anyway, I... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 February 2020

  • Maritime & Coastguard Agency (Maritime & Coastguard Agency)

    Dear PINS, The MCA is a Statutory Consultee and Primary Advisor to the Marine Licensing regulators, and we would appreciate the opportunity to assess the impact of the proposed Aquind Interconnector... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 February 2020

  • Mark Lacey

    the massive disruption that the digging up of numerous major busy roads will cause. the possible health implications of super high voltage cables under the road of busy streets why are we trying to... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 February 2020

  • Michelle Juchau

    I would like to strongly object to the plans set out by Aquind. I think the whole communication process has been shocking and the impact on the local community un-considered. The EIAs all focus on the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 February 2020

  • MR KE SIKORA

    I WISH TO ASSESS THE IMPASCT OF THE PROPOSED INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECT ON THE ENVIRONMENT AND ON URBAN DISLOCATION

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 February 2020

  • Mrs Judith Webberley

    I strongly object to the Aquind development proposal for the following reasons: 1. The size and nature of proposed development is in direct contrast to the present characteristic of the area, which is... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 February 2020

  • Mrs Julie Grove

    I wish to object to Aquind interconnected for the following reasons destruction it will cause to wildlife habitats and vegetation. Air quality issues, major disruption with it effecting major... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 February 2020

  • Mrs S Bagnall

    I wish to strongly object to the Aquino Interconnector being pushed through Eastney and consequently the island of Portsmouth to link up to Lovedean. No consideration has been given to the residents... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 February 2020

  • Neil Hawkins

    I object to this application du to the issues it will cause the residents and businesses in Portsmouth: - traffic congestion - air quality (pollution) - environmental impact (loss of green space)

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 February 2020

  • P J Martin

    I object to this as I believe that it is wrong to choose Portsmouth as the route for the cable. It is the most densely populated place on the whole of the south coast and it will therefore affect the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 February 2020

  • Pam Wilkie

    I strongly object to the Acquind Interconnector being laid from the coast into the eastern side of Portsea Island on the following grounds:- The opinions of Portsmouth City Council, with valuable... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 February 2020

  • Patrick O'Gorman

    My wife and I wish to object to this proposal. We feel distrust and anger towards the application that has been put forward. The complete lack of information over the last 2 years has meant that we... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 February 2020

  • Paul Wright

    My representation will be based upon the following points. 1) The necessity to make landfall in one of the most densely populated cities in Europe and the disruption this will cause. 2) The necessity... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 February 2020

  • Peter Handley

    This cable will cause immense disruption and destruction across the city, with very little tangible benefits to the population that will be most disrupted. The length of time required to do it means... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 February 2020

  • Peter James

    There is no reason why the cables need to go through Portsmouth island, they should go through the harbour and be connected to the mainland at an appropriate point. Portsmouth already has 300,000... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 February 2020

  • Rachel James

    The chaos of this going through town will be unimaginable! When a single accident or roadworks now causes such a traffic build up you know that doing this will bring Portsmouth to a standstill. There... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 February 2020

  • Rachel Norris

    Residents feel distrust and anger towards the application that has been put forward. The complete lack of information over the last 2 years has meant that we have not known what the proposed route of... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 February 2020

  • Richard Rogers

    Objecting. This is not green and environmentallyfriendly

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 February 2020

  • Robert Walden

    I wish to know more of the impact of this poorly advertised plan. I can only Express an opinion when this is done. My pcossible objections would depend on where this is sited and the impact of this... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 February 2020

  • Scott Toman

    I want to know if these works will effect where I live?!

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 February 2020

  • Shaun Nightingale

    My representation centres around concern of the impact the works involved with this project will have on the communities it will disrupt. The traffic in and out of Portsmouth using the Eastern Road is... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 February 2020

  • Sheila Roy

    This is to distrubtive to the local traffic infastructire to a Island city that has only 3 RDS on and off it. It will also damage a huge part of our common that is already reclaimed land.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 February 2020

  • Sylvia Holdforth

    As a Southsea resident I have grave concerns regarding the effect on the environment at Langstone. I also do not understand the sense of importing power from abroad particularly the EU, when the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 February 2020

  • Tracy Barker

    I would like to object to the Aquind Interconnector in the strongest terms. In Portsmouth we only have three main roads on and off our island city which can become quickly grid-locked by roadworks or... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 February 2020

  • Tracy Smith

    I wholly object to this power cable being placed in Portsmouth and the surrounding area. This will have a drastic impact to the local community and their mental health and wellbeing because of the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 February 2020

  • Trevor Clifton on behalf of Trevor David Clifton

    I strongly object to the proposed route of the power cable(s) which passes close to my house because I am unwilling to abide within range of what I consider to be harmful electro-magnetic emissions.... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 February 2020

  • Trudy Farley

    This route is going right past our house and onto the eastern road. No explication as to the disruption expected has been advised to us in our residential area, and the route planned is already a busy... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 February 2020

  • Victoria Campbell

    I am objecting to the limited amount of consultation that residents who will be impacted by this cable's route have had. As I understand it, important final decisions have only been published in the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 February 2020

  • Savills (Savills) on behalf of West Waterlooville Development Ltd/Grainger Plc (West Waterlooville Development Ltd/Grainger Plc )

    The red line denoting the interconnector cable route encompasses land in West Waterlooville Developments Ltd/ Grainger Plc’s ("Grainger") control and which benefits from planning permission for... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 February 2020

  • Alison Bee

    I do not think this plan is in the interest of my city or my local area. This proposal will cause traffic mayhem, destruction of our beautiful common. I believe there is a less intrusive way of doing... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 February 2020

  • Clara Allansson

    Residents feel distrust and anger towards the application that has been put forward. The complete lack of information over the last 2 years has meant that we have not known what the proposed route of... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 February 2020

  • Historic England (Historic England)

    Historic England (retaining the formal title of the Historic Buildings and Monuments Commission for England) is the government service championing England’s heritage and giving expert, constructive... Read more

    Submitted by: Other statutory consultees
    Date submitted: 17 February 2020

  • Ingie Porteous

    I am concerned about the proposed Aquind electricity supply cable making landfall in Eastney and the effect of the development required to continue this cable through its proposed route from Eastney,... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 February 2020

  • Kimberly Barrett

    I wish to object to the proposed Aquind Interconnector and plan on making an in depth written representation. ---------------------------------------------------------- I object to the Aquind... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 February 2020

  • Matthew Wright

    I wish to make known my negative opinion of the application and the negative impact the work would have on the land it would pass through.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 February 2020

  • Portsmouth Divisional Football Association (Portsmouth Divisional Football Association)

    This Association represents the interests of all local grassroots football leagues, youth and adult, male and female. We object in the strongest terms to these proposals. The impact that the works... Read more

    Submitted by: Non-statutory organisations
    Date submitted: 17 February 2020

  • PUBLIC HEALTH ENGLAND (PUBLIC HEALTH ENGLAND)

    Thank you for your consultation regarding the above development. Public Health England (PHE) welcomes the opportunity to comment on your proposals at this stage of the project and can confirm that: 1.... Read more

    Submitted by: Other statutory consultees
    Date submitted: 17 February 2020

  • Richard Salt

    Traffic and parking problems

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 February 2020

  • Blake Morgan LLP on behalf of Robin Jefferies (Robin Jefferies)

    This Relevant Representation is submitted on behalf of Robin Jefferies who wishes to be registered as an Interested Party for the forthcoming examination of the AQUIND Interconnector Development... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 February 2020

  • Simone Taylor-Gray

    I wish to object to the Aquind Interconnector as Portsmouth cannot cope with the disruption to the island. Portsmouth Council have objected to this also and I wish to be registered as an interested... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 February 2020

  • Sue Gosham

    concerned about the impact during and after the proposal

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 February 2020

  • Blake Morgan LLP on behalf of The Owners of Hillcrest (The Owners of Hillcrest)

    This Relevant Representation is submitted on behalf of the Owners of Hillcrest, Old Mill Lane, Lovedean ("the Property") who wish to be registered as an organisation Interested Party for the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 February 2020

  • The Southsea Brewing Co. (The Southsea Brewing Co.)

    I own a business which is based in the proposed area for this project and I believe it will have a significant negative impact on my business and also the people in the community we serve. The points... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 February 2020

  • Vienna Crimes

    I reject the necessity of this project due to the transport, pollution, wildlife devastation and disruption to community open places whilst providing no benefit to the people of portsmouth.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 February 2020

  • Havant Friends of the Earth (Havant Friends of the Earth)

    Havant Friends of the Earth support the application, with reservations. In Support: With other interconnectors, Aquind will support the transition to more renewable sources of energy in the UK, by... Read more

    Submitted by: Non-statutory organisations
    Date submitted: 16 February 2020

  • Tracey Bottrell

    I would like to know how this is going to affect the surrounding area. Trinity estates have received a planning application from Aquind.. I would like to know what impact this is going to cause myself... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 16 February 2020

  • Andrew Rowley

    1) Information about these works has only recently been posted on fixtures in and around Milton Common. They are severely weather damaged. They are very hard to see. I have spoken to a number of users... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 15 February 2020

  • Denmead Parish Council (Denmead Parish Council )

    General issues 1. No evidence is provided that this energy supply is in fact ‘green’. 2. The use of the fibre optic link for commercial purposes is against the regulations 3. Design Principles for... Read more

    Submitted by: Parish councils
    Date submitted: 14 February 2020

  • Hannah West

    I object very strongly to the proposed Aquind cable going through one of the most densely populated cities in Europe. It will cause a horrendous amount of disruption and inconvenience to residents,... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 14 February 2020

  • Mr Peter Carpenter & Mrs Dawn Carpenter

    Relevant Representation This Relevant Representation is hereby submitted who wish to be registered as an Interested Party for the forthcoming Examination of the AQUIND Interconnector Development... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 14 February 2020

  • Blake Morgan LLP on behalf of The Owners of Little Denmead Farm (The Owners of Little Denmead Farm)

    This Relevant Representation is submitted on behalf of the Owners of Little Denmead Farm ("the Farm") who wish to be registered as an organisation Interested Party for the forthcoming Examination of... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 14 February 2020

  • Mr Patrick Whittle

    Please see attached

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 13 February 2020
    Contains attachment(s)

  • Mrs Cynthia Whittle

    Please see attached

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 13 February 2020
    Contains attachment(s)

  • Judith Ann Clementson

    I am opposing the Aquind Limited's application for a DCO based the following reasons: - UK Statistical Information relating to energy consumption since 2000 - Climate Emergency and Strategic Planning... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 12 February 2020

  • South Downs National Park Authority (South Downs National Park Authority)

    The South Downs National Park borders the proposed location of the Convertor Station on three sides and in places it is just 200-300m from the National Park boundary. We would wish to participate in... Read more

    Submitted by: Local authorities
    Date submitted: 12 February 2020

  • APLEAL Action Group (APLEAL Action Group)

    APLEAL (Action to Protect the Living Environment Around Lovedean) is a community action group representing residents in Lovedean, where the proposed Aquind interconnector station will be located, and... Read more

    Submitted by: Non-statutory organisations
    Date submitted: 11 February 2020

  • Cllr Caroline Brook on behalf of Denmead and Newlands Residents

    Outreach of Consultation Location Carbon Footprint Long term Maintenance of Screening Impact on residents and local businesses Impact on school children Traffic management issues Options not properly... Read more

    Submitted by: Non-statutory organisations
    Date submitted: 11 February 2020

  • Patricia Conran

    I own a plot of grazing land measuring 1 1/2 acres in Broadway Lane, Lovedean. My land is used for grazing horses. Aquind are proposing to use 104 square metres of my land to plant hedging and to have... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 11 February 2020

  • Polly Beard

    I would like to register my interest as a resident living close to the proposed interconnector site and raise my objections to the Aquind project on the following grounds. Due to the sheer size of the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 11 February 2020

  • University of Portsmouth (University of Portsmouth)

    Aquind's proposed development route will have a significant impact on land and properties belonging to the University of Portsmouth. The current plans will cause disruption to the University’s... Read more

    Submitted by: Non-statutory organisations
    Date submitted: 11 February 2020

  • Anne Atkinson

    I am writing as both a resident and the owner of a small business directly on the route of the Cable Corridor proposed by Aquind. I strongly disagree with the entire proposal to make landfall on... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 10 February 2020

  • J R Sykes Farms (J R Sykes Farms)

    AS THE TENANT OF WINCHESTER COLLEGE AT DENMEAD FARM, THE CABLING FOR THE INTERCONNECTOR WILL PASS THROUGH THE FARM WHICH I CURRENTLY FARM WITH ARABLE CROPS

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 10 February 2020

  • Veronica Knight

    1.Proposed route will cause excessive disruption to the east side of Portsmouth, already suffering from considerable traffic flow problems. 2.That the route could have been through a less densely... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 10 February 2020

  • Jeremy Warren

    Our interest is essentially from a landscape aspect. What is proposed is a massive building, some 7 stories high, within the open countryside. If approved, the landscape impact is bound to be very... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 9 February 2020

  • Mrs Susan Crossley

    My objections lie with the Con,vertor Station- - to the overall height of the building, inspite of being lowered into the surrounds , and its final visual impact on the landscape. - the effect of the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 8 February 2020

  • The Crown Estate (The Crown Estate)

    The Crown Estate manages property and rights which are owned by Her Majesty in right of the Crown. This portfolio includes around half of the foreshore and almost the entire seabed out to 12 nautical... Read more

    Submitted by: Other statutory consultees
    Date submitted: 7 February 2020

  • N Craise

    Whilst I have many concerns about the route of the proposed cable through Portsmouth my main concern is with the suggested route from Bransbury Park to the allotments via Yeo Court. Yeo Court is... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 6 February 2020

  • Alistair Thompson

    Dear Sir, I am writing to you about the proposed Aquind Interconnector, which will land in Portsmouth. The proposals and lack of public consultation are causing significant concern to residents along... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 4 February 2020
    Contains attachment(s)

  • Horndean Parish Council (Horndean Parish Council)

    The Parish Council would like to repeat its request that an effective traffic management plan is produced and then managed to minimise the disruption to traffic in Horndean and in particular, to... Read more

    Submitted by: Parish councils
    Date submitted: 4 February 2020

  • Peter Crockett

    I live in a house which will be close to the route the cable will be taking. 1. I would like to be kept informed about how far away the cable will be. 2. I would like to know how the possibility of... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 3 February 2020

  • Mrs. Jane Carter

    I object to the laying of the HV electricity cables within and outside the Portsmouth boundary as proposed by Aquind. There is a real danger of radiation from the cables up through the ground if these... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 1 February 2020

  • David Jeffery

    Objection Dramatic impact on the local area both visual and audible especially around the Lovedean area Major disruption to the road networks along the cable route and major effect on local... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 30 January 2020

  • Eversheds Sutherland (International) LLP on behalf of National Grid Electricity Transmission Plc (National Grid Electricity Transmission Plc )

    Representation by National Grid Electricity Transmission Plc and National Grid Gas Plc (together “National Grid”) Application by Aquind Limited for an Order Granting Development Consent for the AQUIND... Read more

    Submitted by: Non-statutory organisations
    Date submitted: 30 January 2020

  • Eversheds Sutherland (International) LLP (Clare Shaw-Carter) on behalf of National Grid Gas Plc (National Grid Gas Plc)

    Representation by National Grid Electricity Transmission Plc and National Grid Gas Plc (together “National Grid”) Application by Aquind Limited for an Order Granting Development Consent for the AQUIND... Read more

    Submitted by: Non-statutory organisations
    Date submitted: 30 January 2020

  • CPRE Hampshire (CPRE Hampshire)

    This Representation summarises the position of CPRE Hampshire We consider that specific and relevant policies clearly indicate that a Development Consent Order should be refused for the reasons set... Read more

    Submitted by: Non-statutory organisations
    Date submitted: 29 January 2020

  • Karen Holden-Craufurd

    Registering as an interested party as the proposed cable route from Anmore Road to the interconnector site may possibly be running along the other side of my boundary and that of Salt Box Barn. If the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 26 January 2020

  • Joint Nature Conservation Committee (Joint Nature Conservation Committee)

    JNCC are a public body that advises the UK government and devolved administrations on UK-wide nature conservation. In terms of this application, we will be advising on the nature conservation impacts... Read more

    Submitted by: Non-statutory organisations
    Date submitted: 24 January 2020
    Contains attachment(s)

  • Guy Shepherd

    If allowed I am concerned at the following: 1 - The noise from the substation in a particularly quiet area and its impact on the community and SDNPA from the transformers and cooling equipment. 2 -... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 January 2020

  • Susan Cox

    My submissions will include comments on: The need for the interconnector The positioning of the interconnector and why it has to be placed in the countryside and not nearer to landfall or on an... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 21 January 2020

  • Mrs Louise Baker

    I am worried about the effects for the Aquind interconnector that has now been accepted for examination by the planning Inspectorate. I believe this will not be examined locally and I have grave... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 20 January 2020

  • The Parish Council of Newlands (The Parish Council of Newlands)

    The route chosen for the cables and if an alternative, less disruptive route is available The disruption to traffic and residents during the installation of cables The heat emissions once cables are... Read more

    Submitted by: Parish councils
    Date submitted: 20 January 2020

  • Brian Hill

    I am a landowner within the Primary Consultation Zone Height of the two proposed connector halls at 22-26 metres will change character of area from rural to industrial and harm the visual setting... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 16 January 2020

  • Eastleigh Borough Council (Eastleigh Borough Council)

    As a neighbouring Local Authority we would like to register as an interested party in order to keep track of the application and assess any impacts on our local residents, which are likely to be... Read more

    Submitted by: Local authorities
    Date submitted: 16 January 2020

  • National Federation of Fishermen (National Federation of Fishermen)

    The following is offered in response to the submitted application documents: Fisheries Liaison and Coexistence Plan It is noted that a number of fisheries mitigation measures have been identified... Read more

    Submitted by: Non-statutory organisations
    Date submitted: 16 January 2020

  • Brenda Lock

    I cannot believe that anyone could think it was a good idea to bring the cables through one of the most congested cities in the country. There are so many alternatives so why make life even more... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 15 January 2020

  • RWE Renewables UK Limited (RWE Renewables UK Limited)

    The proposed route for the marine cables of the Aquind Interconnector crosses the proposed Rampion Extension offshore wind farm site. It is noted that the routeing criteria outlined in the... Read more

    Submitted by: Non-statutory organisations
    Date submitted: 15 January 2020

  • Andy Parks

    I refer to the Aquind Interconnector application to which I would like to make a representation on the following grounds: 1. There is no provision for additional temporary parking in lieu of the loss... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 13 January 2020

  • Barry Scott

    The AQUIND proposal is based upon siting two six/seven storey buildings on some 9 acres of land in the middle of farming country, with close proximity to the South Downs National Park. In order to... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 13 January 2020

  • Michael Johnson

    I wish to object to Aquind's choice of landing spot insomuch as they have chosen to make landfall on the most densely populated Island in the UK and will cause massive traffic upheaval on one of the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 13 January 2020

  • Martin Farrelly

    I disagree with the planned route for the interconnector. The plan is to take the cable corridor through the most densely populated city in the UK, outside of London. Portsmouth is a city that is... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 11 January 2020

  • Associated British Ports (Associated British Ports)

    Associated British Ports (ABP), in its capacity as statutory harbour authority for the Port of Southampton, has received correspondence from Aquind in relation to this project. ABP has been identified... Read more

    Submitted by: Non-statutory organisations
    Date submitted: 10 January 2020