Filter

A303 Stonehenge

Relevant representations (registration comments)

Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.

Showing 926 to 950 of 2370 representations, newest first.

Results per page 25 | View 50 results per page | View 100 results per page

  • Andrew Broadbent

    Dear Sirs, I am writing to you as a very concerned UK citizen, at the moment living and working in Chicago, USA . I am writing with regards to the planning proposal for the A303 Stonehenge... Read more

  • Anne Amison

    These plans will cause irreparable damage to the UNESCO World Heritage Site, its archaeology and setting. UNESCO has described the area as a ‘landscape without parallel’ and their international... Read more

  • Astrid Garran

    I have been following the Blick Mead Mesolithic site since it's discovery and feel that it is of massive interest and importance - there is much more to learn there. I feel the loss of the view of... Read more

  • Carole Humber

    I object to the proposal • It will cause Irreparable damage to the WHS, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’ •UNESCO’s international advisers say the... Read more

  • Del Pickup

    It is my belief that the tunnel as currently proposed will cause irreparable damage to the archaeology of this precious prehistoric landscape which no amount of mitigation will suffice. The proposals... Read more

  • Jamie Roberts

    Stonehenge is a word heritage site and is of national and international importance. Archeological discoveries are being made and are just scratching the surface of our understanding of this emense... Read more

  • Matt Leivers

    Although the scheme is in principle good, the is a single major issue which remains very alarming: the location of the western tunnel portal and approach cutting. Archaeological sensitivity requires... Read more

  • Mrs Tracey Lynam

    This is a World Heritage site and must be protected under strict rules and this work would mean this would not be protected. Approval from the world heritage organisation must be sort. We protect... Read more

  • Nicholas Murrsy Jones

    I am concerned about the high risk of geological stresses this project puts on an area of such unparalleled cultural, historical and emotional importance, not only to the natives of Britain but to... Read more

  • Nina Patrick

    Rwy'n gwrthwynebu'r niwed a gynigir i Gôr y Cewr. Mae'n safle sanctaidd ac ni ddylid ei niweidio o dan eich gofal. Mae'r wefan hon wedi cael ei barchu am filoedd o flynyddoedd ac ni ddylech dderbyn... Read more

  • Brenda Morrison-Webb

    lIrreparable damage to the WHS, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’ UNESCO’s international advisers say the scheme should not go ahead in its present... Read more

  • Christine Tanski

    I object to the irreparable damage that the A303 proposed tunnel will do to Stonehenge WHS

  • Dr Cathy Roberts

    Stonehenge alone is not the whole matter. The landscape itself is a historic monument which should not be interfered with for the convenience of those driving through. One point of the Henge itself is... Read more

  • Leon Russell Davies

    I object to your plans to dig a tunnel through this historic site

  • Sandra Laing

    I am concerned about the destruction of valuable achaeological sites that the new road would destroy. I also believe that some wild life will lose their habitat.Also Stone Henge as a sacred site will... Read more

  • Sonja Chan

    Irreparable damage to the WHS, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’ and I feel that not enough is being done to preserve it. UNESCO’s... Read more

  • Stewart Ford

    In summary my representation is that as a member of the public I wish to be able to contribute my views on this matter. I do take my family by car to visit Stonehenge and I use the road that has been... Read more

  • Colin Boyle

    Irreparable damage to the WHS, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’ UNESCO’s international advisers say the scheme should not go ahead in its present... Read more

  • Heather Marshall

    I object to the proposed A303 Stonehenge Expressway for the following reasons:- 1. It would do irreparable damage to the Stonehenge World Heritage Site (WHS), its archaeology and its setting. UNESCO... Read more

  • James Watts

    The unique site of Blick Mead represents the oldest site of the Stonehenge archaeological landscape, dating back to the Mesolithic period c.10,000 - 8,000 BC. As such, it places the monument and... Read more

  • Jay Sacher

    I am worried about damage to the site. I believe that profit will take precedence over the protection of the Stones.

  • Joan Crosbee

    I am very concerned about the impact that the A303 Stonehenge Expressway will have on this most sensitive World Heritage Site

  • Pauline Gibson

    This plan is terrible. It endangers a World Heritage site, will disturb and destroy important archaeology, cause increased noise in the area of the WHS and harm wildlife. We should not be building... Read more

  • Robert Christensen

    As a citizen of the United States of America and as a global citizen, I would like to express my concern regarding continuance and completion of this upcoming project. While I understand and... Read more

  • Roger Hillier

    I object to the construction of the A303 Stonehenge Expressway because of the damage it would do to the World Heritage Site, and to the Blick Mead Mesolithic site.