Filter

A303 Stonehenge

Relevant representations (registration comments)

Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.

Showing 951 to 975 of 2370 representations, newest first.

Results per page 25 | View 50 results per page | View 100 results per page

  • Rosemary Hogg

    So often we are left mourning that a species has become extinct, that we have ruined some environmental aspect of our planet, damaged a historical building beyond repair. In between is prehistory;... Read more

  • Heather Miranda

    The building of the tunnel will irreparably damage the heritage site.

  • Jeanette Mackenzie

    I would like to register my dismay at the building of a road through the Stonehenge landscape of of exceptional prehistoric interest. This astonishing landscape is one of the most significant... Read more

  • Peter Wheeler

    Due to monetary constraints existing at the moment what is the logic of sinking a tunnel when for a fraction of the cost a dual carriage way could be built. If previous governments had progressed with... Read more

  • Alan Langston

    1) Why on earth would any right minded persons or organisations ever dream of causing untold damage to such a wonderful site. 2) There must be other answers to resolving the traffic problems that... Read more

  • Anita Parker

    The extreme roadworks to this heritage site can and will cause extreme disruption to the archeological value of the area. It will disrupt what is there. In addition no one will be able to see the... Read more

  • Ingrid Peckham

    The proposed scheme will cause irreparable damage to the archaeology and setting of the World Heritage Site around Stonehenge. It will cut across and destroy parts of the wider prehistoric landscape,... Read more

  • Rachael Jack

    I am writing as someone who grew up at Boscombe Down and knows the area well. My major concern is the damage to the archeology of the landscape both known and that not yet discovered. In particular I... Read more

  • Assuntina Cardillo Zallo

    Damage to wildlife and countryside Loss of view from the passing road Huge expense

  • Anne Sutcliffe

    The proposed scheme will cause irreversible damage to a wider prehistoric landscape that is only just beginning to be understood; it will damage the internationally important Blick Mead site and... Read more

  • Bente Hessellund Andersen

    As a Dane with English reletives, I have visited the site of Stonehenge with ny children and now grandchildren year after year. The place is irreplaceable and should not be damaged in any way.

  • Daniel Priestley

    Increased vehicle noise from faster traffic. Irreparable damage to the WHS, its archaeology and setting. Concerns about damage to Blick Mead Mesolithic site and its setting. Lack of alternative... Read more

  • David Bearne

    Stonehenge is a World Heritage Site and should be treated with the utmost respect. There is much still to be discovered in the wider prehistoric landscape and any new road building or tunneling should... Read more

  • Jackie Surtees

    In September 1918 Lord Chubb, on giving the Stonehenge landscape to the nation, wrote “All controversy will now cease and Stonehenge so dear to our hearts will now rest safe and secure...” There... Read more

  • Jake Stratton-Kent

    I am not satisfied that the potential for damage to this unique and irreplaceable site is being considered properly, there is clearly real cause for concern.

  • John Barron

    What is being done to Stonehenge is sacrilege. Please stop now.

  • Margaret Hartnoll

    I am particularly anxious that none of the important archaeological remains all around the Stonehenge area is disturbed. Would seriously suggest less advertising for people to see Stonehenge. It is... Read more

  • Michael Cope

    I object to this piece of wanton vandalism. In 2016 i did a number of walks in the Stonehenge area. These made it clear that Stonehenge exists in an incredible landscape of historic features. It is... Read more

  • Michelle Sallis

    It is important that j'ust because we can do something, doesn't mean we should', is weighed up in this case. It would seem that alternative options with less negative impact have not been provided or... Read more

  • Steve Lake

    - There will be extensive damage to this world heritage site. Stonehenge is integrated into a complete landscape, it is part of a much larger environment and is not a 'stand alone' monument. The... Read more

  • Alison Onslow

    I object to this plan purely because of the damage it will do to such an important site, to both archaeological remains, flora and fauna and to a a World Heritage site. There is no doubt that... Read more

  • Andrea Moore

    Everyone should be able to see the stones for free, and that includes driving past. Disturbance to the wildlife inc rare bird species

  • Anthony Suddaby

    Although I am not a local, the site is obviously of national and global significance. The possibility of damage (which, in fact, has already occurred) to the surrounding site, which is of equal... Read more

  • David Fisk

    This site is described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape and they say the scheme should not go ahead in its present form because of incredible damage to Blick Mead Mesolithic site and its setting. More... Read more

  • Fliss argent

    I am concerned about damage to an ancient national monument and it's surrounding area, including artifacts not already discovered. In addition, the view of the stones will be lost from the road,... Read more