Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.
-
I object to the A303 expressway through the Stonehenge WHS for several reasons. The Stonehenge WHS, including its famous archaeology, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’, will be...
Read more
-
Something like Stonehenge , is truly unique and mystical. I know it belongs to a distant past, which we today can barely relate to? However going to all that effort, if nothing else warrants our...
Read more
-
The proposed dual carriageway scheme would intrude into the UNESCO World Heritage Site, causing irreversible harm to the scenery, wildlife habitats, geology, and possibly destroy archaeological sites...
Read more
-
It would be a terrible shame in the eyes of history and of the world if this incredible monument were to be damaged in the interests of a building project which is likely to have a very limited...
Read more
-
Irreparable damage to the WHS, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’
UNESCO’s international advisers say the scheme should not go ahead in its present...
Read more
-
Hi,
It’s simple - I am objecting the building of a road that will probably be in use for 100 years or less under and around a site that is world heritage listed and has been present for several...
Read more
-
I am very seriously concerned by the proposal to push a tunnel through a registered site of such importance as the whole Stonehenge area. When a World Heritage site so famed as this is under clear...
Read more
-
I am concerned that the current plans will damage the World Heritage Site particularly the archaeology of the site as set out by the UNESCO report.
-
Irreparable damage to the WHS, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without paralle
-
1.Irreparable damage to the WHS, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’
2.UNESCO’s international advisers say the scheme should not go ahead in its present...
Read more
-
Please reconsider this scheme as it currently is not recommend by UNESCO. Neither Does it give sufficient protection to rare birds.
Thanks
-
Apart from the damage that will be done to the WHS itself by the tunnel and other works, I remain convinced that insufficient work has been done on the long term sustainability of the tunnel in terms...
Read more
-
I am very concerned to hear about the proposals for the area around Stonehenge. The damage that this would cause to the environement and wildlife at Stonehenge would be devistating. Once these changes...
Read more
-
I am very concerned by the potential damage done to a unique World Heritage Site: one of the jewels in the United Kingdom's crown. As technology enables new, non-invasive methods of archaeological...
Read more
-
Stonehenge is a World Heritage Site and must be respected as such. This means it needs to stay as original as possible--as it is now! History cannot be replaced. Noise, traffic, disturbed site lines...
Read more
-
1/ The proposed development will cause destabilisation and irreparable damage to an archaeological 'burial' site
2/ Increased noise pollution from faster travelling vehicles
3/ The Stonehenge...
Read more
-
I object to the denial to everyone of the iconic view of a world heritage site that should belong and be available to us, the public, not hidden away for only those who wish to pay to visit.
-
I am a UK citizen presently resident in France.
I see this World Heritage Site as of inestimable value, not just for England, nor even Europe, but for the world entire.
It is meaningless unless...
Read more
-
It would seem that the proposed road development could have a deleterious effect on a major World Heritage site, and quite possibly destroy important archaeological evidence. We are looking at a far...
Read more
-
I object because this proposal is against UNESCO advice, and while threatening irreparable damage to the World Heritage Site as a whole, does not offer alternative safer options. It may also cause...
Read more
-
It is inconceivable to ruin a World Heritage Site any more than it already has been. The construction of A303 Stonehenge Expressway should be avoided at all costs , there would be faster traffic,...
Read more
-
Stonehenge is a sacred site that is spiritually connected to the earth it is built on and no new roads should be built anywhere near it, beneath or above ground! The new road should be diverted far...
Read more
-
I am objecting because:
I consider this to be an act of cultural vandalism, the effects of which can never be reversed. Future generations will hold us culpable for the destruction of this unique...
Read more
-
The values are all wrong. We need to care more about our heritage than the speed of traffic
-
1. Stonehenge is a site of international importance.
2. The entire landscape around Stonehenge is part of the monument; especially the Mesolithic site at Blick Mead.
3. Damage to the environment...
Read more