Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.
-
I am writing to object to the proposed A303 Stonehenge scheme (TR010025), as I believe that it will cause unnecessary and untold damage to a historic site. We are the guardians of this area for future...
Read more
-
It will destroy our history and the memorial that are there. Should have been left as it was for the ancestors of our earth.
-
Stonehenge and its surrounding landscape has been in use for thousands of years; it is a site of major importance, both to our country and to the world, as represented through its UNESCO world...
Read more
-
The tunnel entrance will cause considerable, irreparable damage to the sacred Blick Mead Hill site and natural ancient springs.
The exit will cause damage to another ancient site long barrow.
It...
Read more
-
I am very concerned about the damage that the scheme will cause to the site, particularly in light of the concerns expressed by UNESCO and given that it is a World Heritage Site. The scheme will...
Read more
-
Please don't put a tunnel under Stonehenge. Let it stay connected to the Earth and open to the People
-
I do not believe that this tunnel and associated roadworks represents the best solution to traffic issues on the A303 and will serve no purpose other than moving the holdups further along to put...
Read more
-
I wish to raise my objection strongly against the plans as it will create Irreparable damage to this WHS, its archaeology and setting, UNESCO consider it to be a ‘landscape without parallel’
I fully...
Read more
-
It is too famous a site for this to hapen. It is an act of vandalism.
-
I object strongly the the new proposals for Stonehenge. I believe it will cause irreparable damage to an irreplaceable site.
-
We request that PINS consider the relevant UNESCO/ICOMOS International advice on this project in the decision making process. This is in the form of three mission reports, and UNESCO World Heritage...
Read more
-
This is an outrageous disruption and destruction of pre historic land and it’s many secrets.
It will certainly not affect the visitor numbers or experience of Stonehenge, as we were there recently...
Read more
-
I was frankly appalled on hearing of the plans for road tunneling near to Stonehenge. It seemed to me a desecration of the landscape surrounding the monument which, after all, is a UNESCO...
Read more
-
I was alarmed to hear about the damage already done to the archaeology by road builders some months ago and contend that the site is far too important for any further disturbance to be contemplated. I...
Read more
-
The proposed development will damage a site of international historic significance.
If a developed, first world country with respect for international conventions and the rule of law can destroy the...
Read more
-
Don't do any building around this amazing place, it is very precious. All the fencing, rd parking etc are gross, it's like bad graffiti and it is sacrilegious.. you are not just annoying hippies and...
Read more
-
Colin A. Shell MA M.Met PhD FSA
Senior Fellow, McDonald Institute of Archaeological Research, University of Cambridge.
Member of the Highways England (HE) A303 Amesbury to Berwick Down Project...
Read more
-
I believe that the Application, if granted, represents a breach of a relevant Covenant which runs with the land in question.
-
I object to the proposed plans because it will cause permanent damage to the World Heritage Site, its archaeology and setting. UNESCO's advisers say the scheme should not go ahead in its present...
Read more
-
Irreparable damage to the WHS, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’
UNESCO’s international advisers say the scheme should not go ahead in its present...
Read more
-
This development will harm the best known prehistoric archaeological site in the United Kingdom. The removal of Stonehenge from public view will inevitably harm it and the works associated with the...
Read more
-
I object very strongly to a World Heritage Site being irreprably damaged by the construction of the tunnel. The status of WHS is allocated by UNESCO and they have expressed their objection to this...
Read more
-
Irreparable damage to the WHS, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’
UNESCO’s international advisers say the scheme should not go ahead in its present...
Read more
-
I strongly oppose the proposed development as it will change, irrevocably a site of supreme historical importance. We are robbing future generations of their inheritance for the sake of car journeys...
Read more
-
Do not ruin Stonehenge