Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.
-
Stone henge is a sacred place that is thousands of years old. It has already been handled in a manner that is appalling and the thought of building a tunnel under this sacred place is atrocious. I beg...
Read more
-
IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION FOR A DEVELOPMENT CONSENT ORDER
AND IN THE MATTER OF THE A303 AMESBURY TO BERWICK DOWN (HIGHWAYS ENGLAND)
AND IN THE MATTER OF THE NATIONAL FARMERS UNION...
Read more
-
Overall views, and more detailed comments, relating to the biodiversity impacts of the scheme, including in relation to the Habitats regulation assessment, together with general and specific...
Read more
-
It is unwise to alter world historical sites and nearby areas. A mistake that can likely not be taken back.
-
It is of the gravest importance for us not to destroy or tamper with major sites given magical significance. I know you are unlikely to take this seriously, however I must press its urgency...
Read more
-
I am particularly concerned that there were no options presented in the consultation that would not damage the World Heritage Site.
The option that is presented would inflict permanent damage to...
Read more
-
Hello ... Stonehenge and the surrounded site are an ancient and protected area.. They should remain so as one of the oldest and most pre-eminent archeological sites in the UK ..
We have already...
Read more
-
As a History graduate, I studied Stonehenge and have a better than usual understanding of the area and its importance to the early history of the UK.
This scheme will irreparably damage the wider...
Read more
-
I understand that the area around Stonehenge has many buried artefacts that would be damaged by this tunnel, including ancient long barrows. I also believe that rerouting the road would prevent people...
Read more
-
I believe that the beauty of the area, the landscape and the UNESCO site itself will be at best degraded, and possibly worse, with increased development of expressways in this area. I believe that -...
Read more
-
In summary, there can be no justification to build infrastructure, with climate breakdown ongoing, without very careful consideration of the real purpose, anyway. In this particular case we have a...
Read more
-
I feel most strongly that what is being proposed is outrageous, as the area in question IE Stone Henge is of very significant value to our nation, and should be left alone for prosperity /...
Read more
-
I frankly believe that the proposed tunnel runs the risk of doing immense damage to the incredibly important archaeological remains that could lie In its wake, and thus I feel the need to object to...
Read more
-
The true impact on an ancient monument that has stood for thousands of years has not been properly thought through or examined. Any damage to the ceremonial way or structure itself by man-made forces...
Read more
-
Stonehenge itself is unique, not only within the UK, but unique in world-wide terms. Further, the monument itself does not stand alone but can only be truly understood in its context as the hub of a...
Read more
-
This is such an affront to the land and is so wrong on every level.
-
This is a world heritage site, it needs to be preserved for the enjoyment of future generations. I am concerned that the plans would damage the site and the environment, obscure the view from the...
Read more
-
I am very concerned about the impact of the proposed tunnel on the northern part of the WHS in general and the sites at and associated with the henge at Avebury. These are already over-subscribed with...
Read more
-
The proposed project will adversely impact on the integrity of this ancient site in terms of
The increased traffic flow with its attendant noise and air pollution, increased potential for unsightly...
Read more
-
It will cause irreparable damage to the World Heritage site, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’.
UNESCO’s international advisers say the scheme should...
Read more
-
Is, an alternative more cost effective means of keeping the traffic on the A303 flowing freely.
-
Dear sir or madam,
You are planning to cause irreparable damage to one of the most important archaeological sites in the country. UNESCO thinks this is a terrible idea, and I agree. Even if this...
Read more
-
I object to this proposal on the following grounds: damage to the WHS -UNESCO experts do not approve of this proposal; damage to Blick Mead Mesolithic site and setting; lack of alternative options...
Read more
-
Please find below my concerns regarding the A303 Stonehenge Expressway:
- irreversible damage to Stonehendge landscape and surrounding ancient monuments (such as Blick Mead)
Independent...
Read more
-
The A303 Amesbury to Berwick Down scheme, along with other schemes currently being progressed at Sparkford to Ilchester and Ilminster to M5 at Taunton, are vital first steps towards achieving a whole...
Read more
-
I have been visiting stonehenge since I was a teenager in the 1970's. I attended the festivals in the summer over the solstice period. I am worried that I will no longer be able to see the stones from...
Read more
-
1) The irreversible damage the tunnel entrance will cause to the sacred Blick Mead site.
2) Major concerns regarding the archaeological damage at Long Barrow tunnel exit.
3) The lowering of the...
Read more
-
These plans risk irreparable damage to an area of unique archaeological interest to the whole world. It is extremely short sighted to place such items at any risk.
-
Irreparable damage to the WHS, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’
UNESCO’s international advisers say the scheme should not go ahead in its present...
Read more
-
I object to the project because of the terrible damage it will do to the world
Heritage site and the land under and around it.
-
Damage to world heritage sites that can never be repaired and which should be preserved for future generations.
-
NO Coment do not do the road
-
Representation is to cover aspects of the Countess Roundabout flyover and the impact on residents of Countess Road during construction and subsequent operation. This includes the noise mitigation...
Read more
-
I am deeply concerned that the planned scheme will cause irreparable damage to Stonehenge, a site of immense national and international historic and archaeological significance.
I am also concerned...
Read more
-
Many reasons to stop any changes building or road damage to the site Permanent damage to the World Heritage Site, includes protection of its archaeology and setting.
UNESCO's advisers say the scheme...
Read more
-
In its present form, the proposed project would do irreparable damage to one of the most iconic monuments in the world - a monument that sheds crucial light on a formative time in human history. The...
Read more
-
Stonehenge is a priceless historical treasure for England and the entire world, and I am appalled at the notion that the archaeological integrity of this ancient and wondrous place, full of cultural...
Read more
-
As a farmer and stakeholder in the Stonehenge World Heritage Site (WHS) I interpret my role as being a landowner guardian - a steward and curator for present and future generations. The farm includes...
Read more
-
World Heritage Site. Unique and the proposal will destroy thousands of years worth of history. A303 perfectly capable of working, bank holidays may be a problem but that will be the case on the...
Read more
-
Concern for the destruction of my English heritage and a protected site of national and global importance. Concern for the destruction of history that will never be recoverable.
-
I object to the current proposed plans for a new road and changes to the landscape at Stone henge on the basis that the entire scheme is an assault on an ancient sacred area.
The plans that I have...
Read more
-
-Concern from archaeologists and UNESCO advisers about damage to the site
-Potential disturbance of other nearby sites
-Construction would disturb rare bird populations in the area - Great Bustards...
Read more
-
Having reviewed the application documents on line I am unable to find any appropriate assessment under the Habitats Directive. Inote that appendix 8.25 to the ES is entitled ‘Habitats Regulations...
Read more
-
1) I wish to submit a Representation in respect of Paragraph 201, and related Paragraphs 195 and 196, of Section 16 of the National Planning Policy Framework. The main points will relate i) to the...
Read more
-
I believe the current plans will likely result in the destruction of ancient artefacts and by closing the existing road you will deprive people the opportunity to see the monument in the way that its...
Read more
-
As a practicing Druid this is a sacred site and the proposal is like putting underfloor heating through the tombs of St Paul's. Not only that it I is a world heritage site that is being damaged...
Read more
-
UNESCO have described this place -it's a world heritage site - as a "landscape without parallel". The pretty strong implication is that we should treat it with care and respect and not build all...
Read more
-
The proposals have paid insufficient heed to the nature of the historic landscape, whose very age means that there is potentially more, and more significant, priceless global heritage lying beneath...
Read more
-
The proposed Stonehenge tunnel will damage a site of enormous historical, archaeological, and cultural value. The site is still not fully understood, and any damage would prevent future researchers...
Read more
-
I object to the proposed A303 Stonehenge Expressway and short tunnel for the following key reasons:
1. I believe these enormous earthworks will dwarf the Stonehenge WHS and pre-historic...
Read more