Filter
Lower Thames Crossing

Relevant representations (registration comments)

Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.

Showing 901 to 950 of 1148 representations, newest first.

Results per page View 25 results per page | 50 | View 100 results per page

  • Dr Tim Stout

    Key Objections 1. Potential breach of government’s legal obligations under the Climate Change Act 2008 c.27 and the Environment Act 2021 c.30, especially in relation to biodiversity and air pollution... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Elizabeth Bruce

    I wish to object to the proposed Lower Thames Crossing as it will not solve the traffic problems at Dartford. Most of the traffic comes from the West and won't travel past Dartford to get across the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Elke Browning

    I am against the building if the LTC. Carving up huge swathes of green belt so more and more vehicles can travel around London causing massive pollution not needed. The only problem at the existing... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Elwyn Lloyd Jones

    We have not seen the route and whether it will impede Thames Shipping. If this is a road link. New ICE cars will end in 2030. I don't believe EVs will replace them. So you'll have NO traffic. Also,... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Erik Paul ter Brake

    I believe the new tunnel will induce demand for vehicle traffic in the area. As such the impact on the local residents, on congestion and on air quality are all detrimental.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Essex County Council (Essex County Council)

    Essex County Council’s Relevant Representation The Lower Thames Crossing (LTC) scheme as proposed represent a huge step change for how vehicles can cross the Thames, giving an alternative to the... Read more

    Submitted by: Local authorities
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Glenn Daniels

    Objection to Location Objection to Noise Pollution Objection to Air Pollution Objection to Loss of Green Belt Objection to poor maps of the proposed plans that exclude majority of the housing in South... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Greater North Kent (Greater North Kent)

    Greater North Kent (GNK) is an alliance of, and collective voice for, the North Kent districts of Dartford, Gravesham, Maidstone and Swale together with Medway Unitary Authority and Kent County... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Greener Camping Club of GB (Greener Camping Club of GB)

    We intend to submit evidence that a piece of land being considered for compulsory purchase for the purpose of "off setting" part of this project cannot be considered or pursued as it is already been... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Henrietta Bewley

    The planning inspectorate should consider the impact of: 1. Rising sea levels due to climate change. Sea levels are predicted to rise between 40m and 70m, depending on the world temperature rise. It... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Henry Binns

    I have serious concerns about the impact on wildlife and habitats in Essex, including: Biodiversity loss, such as water voles, reptiles and rare insects. Damage to and fragmentation of habitats,... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • DLA Piper UK LLP (DLA Piper UK LLP) on behalf of HS1 Limited (HS1 Limited)

    We have submitted a full document via email setting out HS1 Limited's relevant representation in respect of the Development Consent Order (“DCO”) application for the proposed A122 Lower Thames... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023
    Contains attachment(s)

  • Jacqui Bedding

    I have serious concerns about the impact on wildlife and habitats in Essex, including: Biodiversity loss, such as water voles, reptiles and rare insects. Damage to and fragmentation of habitats,... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Jacqui Mann

    As a local resident I am concerned about the infrastructure of this proposed development including increase in traffic, poor air quality, impact on local roads & destruction of green spaces. I am also... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • James Booth

    The LTC will increase traffic on the A227 cutting through to and from the M20 and M26, in particular goods vehicles. NO BUDGET HAS BEEN SET ASIDE TO MITIGATE THIS. NO ACTIONS TO RESTRICT HGV USE OF... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Jan Green

    Opposition to the LTC.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Jeff Stafford

    Key Objections 1. Potential breach of government’s legal obligations under the Climate Change Act 2008 c.27 and the Environment Act 2021 c.30, especially in relation to biodiversity and air pollution... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Jimmy Allan

    I have serious concerns about the impact on wildlife and habitats in Essex, including: Biodiversity loss, such as water voles, reptiles and rare insects. Damage to and fragmentation of habitats,... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Joanne Taylor

    The project has a heavy effect on my home and surroundings. I therefore wish to be kept informed/updated and provide my input as I have done from the very beginning when this was started. Thank you.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • John Corbett

    The whole project will not achieve the stated aim of significantly reducing traffic at the Dartford Crossing. It still pollute and decimate a semi-rural area and is an expensive ill-conceived white... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • John Dighton

    I object to the LTC because of, 1 Damage to the environment 2 Damage an upheaval to Thurrock and Kent’s people lives and homes. Health with the increase traffic in the area. 3 The cost. We all realise... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Joyce Bell

    I am opposed to the scheme because It will not solve the problems at the Dartford Crossing It will lead to gridlock across North Kent if people try to get from the M25 to the LTC when there are... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Julia Lopez MP

    While not an exhaustive list, the main points that I wish to develop in my further detailed representation during the formal examination are: • That I am broadly supportive of the project, recognising... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Birketts LLP (Birketts LLP) on behalf of Kathryn Homes Limited (Kathryn Homes Limited)

    OUTLINE OF MAIN POINTS OF OBJECTION TO LOWER THAMES CROSSING 1. Unacceptable impacts on Whitecroft Care Home, Stanford Road, Orsett, Thurrock, and its residents and employees, due to the magnitude of... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Kent Wildlife Trust (Kent Wildlife Trust)

    Kent Wildlife Trust (KWT) engaged with Highways England (“the Applicant”) prior to DCO submission, with a focus on reducing the impacts upon the internationally important habitats of the North Kent... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Linda Catton

    I strongly oppose option C

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • London Friends of the Earth Network (London Friends of the Earth Network)

    We are now in a climate emergency so dire that if we do not radically change our ways, will make th Earth largely uninhabitable for humans and most other creatures. We got a taste of that last year... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Lumen Technologies UK Limited (formerly CenturyLink) (Lumen Technologies UK Limited (formerly CenturyLink))

    Lumen Technologies UK Limited is a Communications utility who owns 80% of the worlds Sub-Sea fiber optic cables, the Lower Thames Crossing project will impact and affect 2 x separate Fibre Optic... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Madeleine Wells

    1. Biodiversity loss 2. Fragmentation of local habitats and corridors for wildlife. 3. Damage to ancient woodland 4. Noise pollution and light pollution blighting the lives of insects, particularly... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Margaret Moore

    This scheme creates massive environmental and social issues and does not solve the problems at Dartford Crossing. The cost is prohibitive, especially given the economic challenges in this country.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Marianne Longhurst

    All options to view what is going to be developed have been limited and last minute, thereby not providing communities with sufficient time to question what is happening. This has been concealed in... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Matthew Fooks

    Concerns about -cost -envioronmental impact -a poor solution to solve the traffic problems at the Dartford Crossing -will cause unacceptable congestion on the M2 and A229 -Changes to A2/M2 junctions... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Meopham Parish Council (Meopham Parish Council)

    Meopham Parish Council has participated in all the many consultations run on this project and have concerns that have not been addressed in the consultation materials. Below is a summary of the... Read more

    Submitted by: Parish councils
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Knight Frank (Knight Frank) on behalf of Metropolitan Police Service (Metropolitan Police Service)

    Knight Frank act on behalf of the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS) and the Mayor’s Office for Policing and Crime (MOPAC), in relation to the Metropolitan Police Service Training Centre (MPSTC)... Read more

    Submitted by: Other statutory consultees
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Metrotidal Limited (Metrotidal Limited)

    Post-Brexit, Post-Covid there is less demand for the road-only Lower Thames Crossing Midland-Dover HGV hypotenuse as freight can and will be diverted from Dover by the climate change, carbon-pricing,... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Michael Shipway

    Build the tunnel. Trying to drive through the existing Dartford Tunnel is a conjecturing nightmare

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Michael Spurr

    I am against the crossing because it will not solve the problems at Dartford and make Gravesend more congested. The noise and pollution levels east of Gravesend will greatly increase and people's... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Mnika Davis

    I think this could be resolved in way good for environment and people too

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Moira Brock

    Having lived in this area all my life I find this proposal completely unrealistic. Every time you increase the road capacity you increase traffic, which in turn increases pollution and destroys the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Mr Peter Johnson

    I have serious concerns about the impact on wildlife and habitats in Essex, including: - Biodiversity loss, such as water voles, larger mammals, reptiles and rare insects. - Damage to and... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Mr Robin Bull

    I do not believe the proposals will solve the problems suffered due to the Dartford Crossing (the original brief). The proposals will induce demand and increase cross river traffic (around 50%),... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Mrs Patricia Dobinson

    I am against the proposed crossing as it will be built on a large amount of green belt land. The placement takes traffic back onto already extremely busy motorways. The area in Essex already has high... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Mrs S Hadwin

    I am very much against this project particularly at a time when we are becoming more aware of the damage to our environment and the need to protect it. The loss of biodiversity in the UK has been... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Mrs. F. Ball

    Rising cost of the LTC. Length of time to complete the project is estimated at approx. 5 years Cost could rise again substantially. Increase in congestion during construction due to Construction... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • National Gas Transmission (National Gas Transmission)

    Relevant Representation of National Gas Transmission Plc in respect of the Lower Thames Crossing DCO (the “Project”) This relevant representation is submitted on behalf of National Gas Transmission... Read more

    Submitted by: Other statutory consultees
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Vicky Cashman (Vicky Cashman) on behalf of National Grid Electricity Transmission Plc (National Grid Electricity Transmission Plc)

    Relevant Representation of National Grid Electricity Transmission Plc in respect of the Lower Thames Crossing DCO (the “Project”) This relevant representation is submitted on behalf of National Grid... Read more

    Submitted by: Other statutory consultees
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Nicola Ovey

    As a resident, I whole heartedly object to this project through disruption to diverted traffic, being closed in a triangle of motorways subjected to increased pollution and increased noise levels.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • North Kent Marshes Internal Drainage Board (North Kent Marshes Internal Drainage Board)

    As both permanent and temporary works fall within the drainage district of the North Kent Marshes Internal Drainage Board, we would like to make comments regarding flood risk from primarily surface... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Winckworth Sherwood LLP on behalf of Northumbrian Water Limited (operating as Essex & Suffolk Water) (Northumbrian Water Limited (operating as Essex & Suffolk Water))

    Please see attached.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023
    Contains attachment(s)

  • BTF Partnership (BTF Partnership) on behalf of Orsett Fen Right Holders (Orsett Fen Right Holders)

    following and then if required, full reps can be submitted at the next stage. Anything to add? INTERESTED PARTY 1. Orsett Fen Right Holders PLOT NUMBERS 2. 35-11, 35-13, 35-14, 35-15, 35-16, 35-21,... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023