Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.
-
Hampshire County Council (The Council) is a host authority for this application, with specific interests relating to local highway impact, Lead Local Flood Authority and Countryside Access (Public...
Read more
-
We have a climate and biodiversity crisis inc. consequences of the aforementioned on our health and well-being plus wider nature. These crises require a comprehensive comparative analysis of the...
Read more
-
M3 Junction 9 Improvement - very important and vital for the area.
-
Historic England (retaining the formal title of the Historic Buildings and Monuments Commission for England) is the government service championing England’s heritage and giving expert, constructive...
Read more
-
I am the owner of a property which is at [] and includes approximately one mile of the River Itchen and is an SSSI. The property is accessed via the A33 and will be impacted by the proposed project....
Read more
-
Royal Mail (RM) does not have an in principle objection to this proposed road scheme but is seeking to secure mitigations to protect its operations during the construction phase. Under section 35 of...
Read more
-
Approximately 62% of the proposed Scheme area falls within the South Downs National Park and the majority of the remaining Scheme area is within the setting of the National Park. In summary, the...
Read more
-
Thank you for your consultation regarding the above development. The UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) welcomes the opportunity to comment on your proposals at this stage of the project. Please note...
Read more
-
We live close to this junction and my concern is the increase in noise, traffic polution plus increase in traffic that may divert through our area.
-
1 I'm a regular user of this A33/A34/M3 junction. 2 I am especially interested in plans to free flow from A33/A34 to M3 southbound and northbound. 3 I am eager to see the final plans for separating...
Read more
-
This is unethical. The carbon footprint of this project is very high. We don't need a bigger motorway we need investment in our local roads which are blighted by potholes and we need better bus...
Read more
-
Huge environmental impact.Spend on more pressing projects.
-
Do not see that the need for this scheme has been established
-
In the midst of a climate and biodiversity emergency, this road building project does not make sense. The investment would be better spent on public transport or cycling infrastructure.
-
As the County Councillor the the Itchen Valley Division, the impact of the M3 junction 9 proposals both during construction, and in operation will have a huge effect on residents in my division. The...
Read more
-
Many of the roads in my vicinity are in a very poor condition with potholes, cracks and deep drops at the sides which have caused damage to my and my family's cars and could potentially cause injury....
Read more
-
I believe this junction construction to be a waste of money saving little time for commuters such as myself, and causing more chaos on the M27 following years of upheaval as the smart motorway was...
Read more
-
This project is environmentally hostile to wildlife and plant life, and will during its construction cause much carbon dioxide to be emitted. And the extra cars using it will too Spend the money on...
Read more
-
This scheme encourages road traffic and will release massive volumes of carbon dioxide with the extensive use of concrete. Both of these are incompatible with reaching net zero by 2030
-
Money could be better spent on up keep in roads and the local area
-
This project is not compatible with the UK commitment to net zero. The CCCC has said we must stop road infrastructure building in order to reduce emissions. It will make little difference to...
Read more
-
This is a waste of money which should be better spent on public transport. The idea is outmoded and old fashioned. You are polishing a turd. The transport policy is broken if you have to resort to...
Read more
-
The amount of money necessary to make this change is not worth the outcome. It would be much more useful if it went into something more people could appreciate, such as a relief scheme for people...
Read more
-
I am a landowner whose property lies alongside the A34. My land includes a SSSI - it adjoins Winnall Moor. I am concerned to know the precise details of the plans to protect & not jeopardise this...
Read more
-
I am very concerned about the use of a huge amount to tax payers' money, better spent on reducing car travel, not increasing it. This is bad for the planet as well as the local air quality in our...
Read more
-
General Interest This project will be taking place in part within The Civil Parish of the Itchen Valley. Itchen Valley Parish Council is one of the largest Parish Councils in the Winchester District....
Read more
-
I am a local resident that lives next to the motorway. I have concerns about how the change to four lanes will impact on noise and pollution for me and my fellow residents. I am interested to explore...
Read more
-
RJM is landowner of farmland/water meadows alongside the A34. The land includes part of the Barton Carrier river & is a SSSI - it adjoins Winnall Moor. I am concerned to know the precise details of...
Read more
-
It is contrary to the local council (Winchester City Council and Hampshire County Council) Declarations of Climate Emergency and their action plans It will not solve any congestion problem The road...
Read more
-
We object this project because: - it will lead to increased carbon dioxide emissions and air pollution by increasing car traffic accross the region - it will increase noise pollution - it will...
Read more
-
I would like to support the position held by WinACC. This scheme is only likely to create induced demand, increase pollution and take much needed funding away from active travel. I am unconvinced that...
Read more
-
I object to this scheme as it will lead to an increase in traffic and carbon emissions. In the Environmental Statement National Highways say the scheme would cause an extra 37,070 tonnes of carbon...
Read more
-
I strongly object to this development and the impact it will have on the South Downs National Park and local communities through air and noise pollution, visual impact and climate change. At a time...
Read more
-
Dr Andrew Boswell, Climate Emergency Planning and Policy I am an independent environmental consultant. I object to the M3 Junction 9: (1) The most important question is “to what extent does the...
Read more
-
I would like to raise concerns about noise, disruption and deterioration in air quality for local residents living vary close to the junction and in the surrounding roads.
-
As a neighbouring Local Authority we would like to register as an interested party in order to keep track of the application and assess any impacts on local residents and the local environment. These...
Read more
-
Our ref: HA/2023/124853/02 Your ref: TR010055 Date: 13 March 2023 Dear Sir or Madam, Application by National Highways Company Limited for an Order Granting Development Consent for the M3 Junction 9...
Read more
-
Hampshire Countryside Access Forum (HCAF) is an independent statutory body with members who represent the views of recreational users, land managers and others with an interest in countryside access....
Read more
-
I’m concerned that active travel has not been prioritised appropriately.
-
A city councillor in a ward affected by the M3 J9 project.
-
As a local City and Parish Councillor I am keen to ensure that the impacts of noise, disruption of local traffic and air quality are properly assessed and mitigated.
-
New Forest District Council recognises that there are unlikely to be any direct impacts on its communities. Nevertheless, the wider implications of the project on the strategic highway network...
Read more
-
To ensure the project is really worth it and if it goes ahead will it be another HS2 and stop halfway leaving a mess for whatever time it takes to get the money to carry on. Also similar to the...
Read more
-
This is a massive increase in width of the motorway, effectively doubling in size. Although the plan is to create 'species-rich' grassland, etc, the fact is that land is being taken to build this...
Read more
-
£200 million could be better spent on things with a positive impact rather than the negative impact this scheme will produce. We need to have fewer cars on the roads, not make space for more. I am...
Read more
-
The A34/M3 Junction 9 scheme will provide strategic access to the Port of Southampton on the important Midlands-Solent corridor for freight. Reliability and congestion at this junction has been...
Read more
-
This relevant representation is submitted on behalf of Southern Water Services Limited (“SWS”). SWS is the appointed water undertaker under the Water Industry Act 1991 for certain areas in the...
Read more
-
As a local resident and motorist, I do not see a need for this development. I use this junction regularly and the improvements it will make to the journey are minimal in the light of the huge cost of...
Read more
-
These are my remaining comments from the 2021 consultation that I would like to enter into the Examination: 1/ Why has the existing R&W materials compound site situated right next to Junction 9...
Read more
-
Transport Action Network objects to the DCO application as the Applicant acknowledges the scheme would lead to increases in traffic and carbon emissions. This will make it more difficult fir tge UK to...
Read more