Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.
-
The amount of aircraft’s already populating the sky in our area causing a constant noise pollution. This has a real (negative) impact on the lives of real people on a daily basis. We should do...
Read more
-
We have been particularly affected by Gatwick arrivals overflights, night and day, since the 2013 flightpath changes. In 2016, Gatwick promised improvements which have not been fulfilled. We are...
Read more
-
We are already plagued by noise and pollution, with no help from the airport to mitigate. This will worsen things and have a negative impact on the value of my property.
-
I commute to London everyday, the trains are overcrowded, the infrastructure can’t cope as it is. The airport has RACC concrete sort that first! I also live locally and don’t want to see and hear...
Read more
-
Concerns about the amount of aircraft taking off and flying low over my property, particularly early morning and late at night
-
Extra air pollution, extra noise, more fossil fuel being burnt by maneuvering aircraft. No quiet ground running area at Gatwick. Air traffic control will need to expand to contain the flight paths...
Read more
-
I am very concerned about the expansion of Gatwick Airport and the2nd runway on the towns and villages in it flight paths.
-
There is already noise and air pollution from the current airport which is disturbing to live near. Also in recent years there has been a huge increase in taxi drivers and holiday makers using the...
Read more
-
I object to this development because: 1) It will cause more air pollution. 2) It will cause more noise pollution. 3) It is unnecessary as less people are flying since Covid. 4) We already suffer with...
Read more
-
Living under a flight path into Gatwick, I’m very aware of the increase in air traffic over the past 30 years. I consider the present volume of traffic to be the maximum that should be permitted but I...
Read more
-
I object to the further expansion at Gatwick. No only does the expansion breach green targets but the noise from low flying aircraft is already intolerable. In addition, Gatwick can nearly run a...
Read more
-
The environmental affects caused by increased flights, increased traffic with associated parking, etc.
-
I live in a village already affected by Gatwick flights and am extremely concerned about the impact a second runway will have. I am registering initially and will comment further as appropriate
-
I have an interest as a local resident affected by flightpaths
-
I strongly object to this proposal to bring Gatwick’s northern runway into permanent use. Gatwick is located in a rural position, well away from London. The flight paths affect rural neighbourhoods...
Read more
-
I have a vested interest as I sit under the flight path in the plans. The increased flights would have a negative impact on local residents and there must be some compromise. Night flights need to be...
Read more
-
Gatwick is seeking a new runway which would result in an extra 100,000 flights per year. Much of Surrey and Sussex are already impacted by noise and pollution from aircraft. This can only worsen if...
Read more
-
I am slightly in favour of an additional runway at Gatwick Airport. I have spent most of my life living close to international airports - Heathrow 31 years, Gatwick - 44 years. I worked airside at...
Read more
-
The increase in traffic on road and rail will have huge impact on locals. Further congestion of all roads as the rail line cannot be increased and roads are already overloaded at peak hours. No...
Read more
-
For me, the 24/7 concentrated flight paths introduced without consultative planning in 2013/2014 are a major reason for lack of sleep at night and rest and relaxation in the day. I cannot have people...
Read more
-
My home is likely to be adversely affected by additional aircraft movements resulting from development of the North Runway at Gatwick. I want to be informed about the proposed development.
-
Exssecive noise
-
I believe the UK transport infrastructure should be re-aligned to increase/improve road and rail public transport links within the UK rather than increase global aviation pollution. For the benefit of...
Read more
-
We are already impacted by noise pollution from aircraft and a second runway will increase our exposure. More emphasis on quieter less polluting aircraft using Gatwick is urgently required.
-
Additional aircraft flying overhead polluting the area even more Additional traffic on the surrounding roads which are already busy & subject to numerous accidents on the motorway which has no hard...
Read more
-
My home in Burgess hill is a stack location for aircraft and will be affected by the extra planes
-
Concerned about pollution,noise,extra traffic, harm to wildlife, taxis parking and littering.
-
There is too much aircraft noise NOW. Air traffic control allows short cuts and corner cutting allowing an increased noise footprint in thee local areas
-
There are already too many flights over the area with loud aircraft. And I don’t think there should be more flights considering environmental issues. I oppose a new runway.
-
Will additional flights be expected to fly around the village of Cowden as exhorting flights do and not over it?
-
- noise pollution - affect on local population capacity - traffic
-
Oppose the Development Consent Order (DCO) for the new runway due to air and noise pollution
-
I want to know how this proposed change will effect our quality of life.
-
The level of pollution from both noise and fumes in this area is already beyond unacceptable. As someone who does not smoke but has been diagnosed with (redacted) I am sure that the airport is a...
Read more
-
I object to the proposal on the grounds of increased noise, pollution, global warming emissions, and related development and road traffic.
-
For many years now, I have been officially complaining about aircraft noise over the rural village of Brenchley. As a consequence, I have a very thick file of papers in relation to the noise and...
Read more
-
I fully support the use of the northern runway. Gatwick is a huge asset for the local surrounding areas but also for the UK and I feel this must not be overlooked regardless of the naysayers. Yes...
Read more
-
I object on grounds of noise I oppose the new runway because noise & disturbance caused by increase in flights & lack of decent transport infrastructure
-
The noise is too intrusive & disturbing We have got to consider the pollution Cheap flight that are unreliable Overcrowding without the infrastructure
-
I strongly oppose the expansion of Gatwick Airport. It is environmentally irresponsible - we already suffer from poor air quality, aircraft noise and climate change impacts, a second runway will make...
Read more
-
My wife and I moved to RH12 3AH in 1989, and in those days, living right under the main flight path turning (yes, we live at the end of the 12-mile straight approach on an elevated hill) was not too...
Read more
-
I AM OPPOSED TO THE PROJECT IT GOES AGAINST YOUR CLIMATE CHANGE COMMITTEE YOU WILL BE ADDING TOO MANY CARBON EMISSIONS INTO THE AIR IT GOES AGAINST NET ZERO THE NOISE POLLUTION WILL BE TORTUROUS WE...
Read more
-
I see multiple challenges with the expansion. Firstly, the current noise pollution levels experienced by residents is already too high and causing mental health and quality of life challenges. Planes...
Read more
-
We are already overflown with a significant number of flights on a daily. We suffer from pollution from the planes and also noise issues. We also have these problems throughout the night as Gatwick...
Read more
-
Our property in Capel is directly overflown by aircraft taking off in a westerly direction and then turning north towards the east. More flights will mean more aircraft noise (which can be quite bad...
Read more
-
Oppose the Development Consent Order (DCO) for the new runway due to air and noise pollution
-
I am opposed to this development on multiple grounds, not least the increased noise disturbance. Planes already frequently deviate from the agreed corridors and more flights would exacerbate this. I...
Read more
-
Broader impact of combined disturbance by flights to include Heathrow and Redhill Airodrome as well as Gatwick, all of which together already have a deliterious impact on our area and home.
-
We are under the inbound flight path, at the bottom of the stack. We are already blighted by flights day and night causing disrupted sleep. There us no rest bite.
-
In the current move to reach net zero I’m not sure how almost doubling the capacity of an airport helps reach this. The infrastructure in the area is already stretched, this will not help in the...
Read more