Filter

Cambridge Waste Water Treatment Plant Relocation

Relevant representations (registration comments)

Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.

Showing 51 to 100 of 309 representations, newest first.

Results per page View 25 results per page | 50 | View 100 results per page

  • Colin Martyn Lizieri

    This project is unnecessary, largely benefits shareholders, not local communities and, critically, threatens the local environment, including SSSIs, not least given water companies' track record of... Read more

  • Jon Tollit

    Honey Hill Proposed Sewerage Treatment Works The existing facility at Milton is perfectly viable for needs for many years and does not need relocation. The study to select a site was flawed and did... Read more

  • Pamela McLeman

    I object to this infrastructure project. Anglian water admits there is no operational need to move. It's a waste of taxpayer money, (£227 million), a scandal, in the light of Thames Water + the debt... Read more

  • Peter Charles Eric Halford

    My fundamental objection to this planning proposal is that, by Anglian Water’s own admission, there is no operational need for a relocation of Cambridge Waste Water Treatment Works. However if such... Read more

  • Christine Shaw

    The proposal for Honey Hill is very much against Green policies and talk from Government agencies. In these times of global warming I fail to see how it helps the planet or local area to uproot a... Read more

  • Mark Woolfenden

    I object to the poorly conceived and ill thought through proposed relocation of the Cambridge Sewage Works to Honey Hill, between the conservation villages of Fen Ditton and Horningsea. · Moving the... Read more

  • Mrs Laurie Woolfenden

    Bigger than Wembley, and floodlit I object to the poorly conceived and ill thought through proposed relocation of the Cambridge Sewage Works to Honey Hill, between the conservation villages of Fen... Read more

  • Rae Langton

    I wish to register as an Interested Party for a reason particular to our own situation, and several more general reasons. The particular reason is that our water supply is entirely from our own well:... Read more

  • The Federation of Cambridge Residents Associations (FeCRA) (The Federation of Cambridge Residents Associations (FeCRA))

    Dear Sir/Madam, Anglian Water’s DCO application to relocate the sewage works I am writing on behalf of the Federation of Cambridge Residents Associations’ ( FeCRA) to register as an IP and to object... Read more

  • Mark Woolfenden on behalf of John Woolfenden (John Woolfenden)

    SAVE HONEY HILL AT FEN DITTON THE HONEY HILL SITE FOR A PROPOSED NEW SEWERAGE TREATMENT PLANT HAS BEEN ILL -THOUGHT OUT BY OUR 'SUPPOSEDLY’ ILLUSTRIOUS PLANNERS OF THE ENVIRONMENT". THE HONEY HILL... Read more

  • Susan Bates

    I fail to see the need to move the existing site down the road at a cost of £227 million just to build houses also the traffic during construction will cause problems for children on their way to... Read more

  • Kathy Broadbent

    This project has not been adequately thought through, the council are building a sewage works on greenbelt land rather than upgrading the existing site on brownfield land because it's cheaper and the... Read more

  • Michael Kiernan

    The potential siting of a major sewage works just 1.5km from the new build I purchased at Marleigh was never declared by Hill or Marshall at the time of purchase. The enormous environmental impact of... Read more

  • Wendy Tina Rose

    I am registering an interest in the land at [Redacted] which was sold with a restrictive covenant in our favour. We would like to state a claim of interest that when [Redacted] was first sold a clause... Read more

  • A Gledhill

    Anglian Water have confirmed that there isn't an operational requirement to move the waste water treatment works. The environmental burden of building the new site and decommissioning and... Read more

  • Catherine Sparks

    1 Im very concerned about the building of a large structure on green belt land near Cambridge ,Fen Ditton and Horningsea . There is constant overdevelopment in our area repeatedly destroying green... Read more

  • Colin Ramsay

    As a local Horningsea resident, I'm raising my concerns below with regards to the planned relocation of sewage works to Honey Hill in Cambridge. - Impact on the conservation areas of Fen Ditton and... Read more

  • Katharina Faller

    I’m very concerned about the heavy carbon cost of replacing a working sewage works. We live on the new marleigh development and I’m also concerned about the impact it will have on us in terms of odour... Read more

  • L Yarrow

    I object to a private water company being given £227 million of taxpayers money to move from a sight that is able to be used well into the future, just to free up the current sight for Development.... Read more

  • Natalya naqvi

    Honey hill sewage plant will cause environmental disaster and increase traffic on high ditch road and Ditton lane to unlivable levels. There are already numerous accidents on this road

  • Peter Matlock

    Why is there a need to do this in the first place as I believe the existing water treatment facility is more than able to cope with any expansion . This would seem a compete waste of money as well as... Read more

  • Dr. Sheila Margaret Porrer

    I wish to register an objection to the proposed construction of a new sewage treatment plant on land near Horningsey and Fen Ditton known as Honey Hill. The grounds of my objection are many, but these... Read more

  • Helen Jane Warnock

    I object to the moving of the Sewage Works to Honey Hill. The CWWTP does not need to move on operational grounds. In 2015 the present works was upgraded to meet the needs of the expansion of Cambridge... Read more

  • Ian Watt

    Dear Sir/Madam, I wish to take this opportunity to express my objection to the proposal to move the sewage works to Honey Hill. First and foremost there is no operational need for this move to be... Read more

  • Geraldine Roper

    I am concerned about the building of a massive infrastructure on GREENBELT agricultural land, and the impact on our countryside and wildlife , so depleted now. I dont hear enough details on how all... Read more

  • Jennifer Krombacher

    Main issues: The project is unnecessary and inappropriate. Honey Hill is an unacceptable choice of site. The project is unnecessary because the existing water treatment works in Milton are fully... Read more

  • Paula Bishop

    I think that this project is so unnecessary given that the water company have already admitted that the current site continues to be fit for purpose. We're living in such financially constrained times... Read more

  • Barbara Le Gallez

    I am opposed to the proposed project, for the following reasons: 1) There is no operational need for it. 2) It will damage the Green Belt, including farmland and recreational areas. 3) It will... Read more

  • Christine Turnbull

    I am wholly opposed to this project particularly as it is so close to a very important aquafer. It is using up valuable GREEN BELT productive agricultural land - still being farmed. It is almost next... Read more

  • Fiona Bryant

    Comments in relation to economic, social and environmental impact

  • Helen le Breton Skaer

    I am not convinced that this scheme is necessary as the current sewage plant at Milton is fit for purpose for the same length of time and for the same predicted population that we are told is the... Read more

  • Howard Aston

    1. The proposed relocation site for the Cambridge Waste Water Treatment Plant (the "Sewage Works") is named Honey Hill and is Green Belt land. Building on Green Belt land is contrary to national and... Read more

  • J Seamarks

    I am a young person ; I am concerned no developments actually help young people on the property ladder. I am a Key Worker and have no chance of obtaining a £350k mortgage for an affordable home. This... Read more

  • Karen Briscombe

    I object to the proposed relocation of the Cambridge Sewage Works to Honey Hill, between the conservation villages of Fen Ditton and Horningsea.  Moving the sewage works about a mile down the road, at... Read more

  • Kieran Burke

    There has bee no consideration of the impact on the conservation areas of Fen Ditton and Horningsea. This has been overlooked by Anglian Water. Building on Green Belt land in order to open brown sites... Read more

  • Louise Harper

    Objection regarding access and farm land use.

  • William Robert Harper

    This project directly impacts farmers, landscape, nature and the local residents to name a few. It will also create a major impact on local pollution and traffic problems

  • John Sandey

    My objection to the relocation of the sewage works to Honey Hill I have decided to lodge an objection to the construction of a sewage works at Honey Hill. I have set out below the main reasons which... Read more

  • Lynn Arnold

    I am very concerned about the building of new sewage outlet for these reasons: The negative impact on conservation area if Fen Ditton and the effect it will have on wildlife and diversity. Building on... Read more

  • Rebecca Hollweg

    It is unnecessary, wasteful, unecological and will ruin an area of natural beauty, upsetting many local residents.

  • Abbey Greens Ward Office (Abbey Greens Ward Office)

    I am concerned about the impact of site traffic on a busy junction. Honey Hill is the site of an attractive circular walk and is the gateway to the Wicken Fen nature reserve, so there is a loss of... Read more

  • Alan Hugh Muhr

    I object to the relocation of Cambridge Waste Water Works from Milton to Honey Hill for the following reasons: - the Green Belt status of Honey Hill should be respected. I am very familiar with the... Read more

  • Friends of the Cam (Friends of the Cam)

    Friends of the Cam's primary grounds for objection to moving the Waste Water Treatment Plan from its current site in NE Cambridge to Honey Hill: 1.Demolition and new construction are heavy carbon... Read more

  • Harriet Wykeham

    The existing plant is fully functional and has been future-proofed. I therefore don't think it's acceptable to build on Green Belt land, and incur both the monetary and carbon cost of that.

  • Janet Walker

    My objections Inter alia - Impact on the Green Belt, which is contrary to national and local planning policies - likely impact on and important rare chalk aquifer; - Impact on public rights of way,... Read more

  • Jean Williams

    I wish to object to the relocation of the sewage works on the following grounds: It is contrary to several City Council policies, including their declared biodiversity and climate change emergencies.... Read more

  • nicola marshall

    It should not be relocated to honey hill for environmental reasons and should remain in its current position.

  • Rhian Benstead

    Why are we using £227 million of taxpayers’ money to fund the completely unnecessary move of a perfectly functionable sewage works from its current location to a green belt area, which is contrary to... Read more

  • Schia Sinclair

    I don’t think that the sewage works should be relocated at all, to anywhere, and definitely not to an area of green belt. My specific issues are as follows: 1. Building on green belt. 2. The carbon... Read more

  • A Chapman

    I am writing to make clear my objection to the proposed creation of a new Sewage Works at the Honey Hill beauty spot between Horningsea and Fen Ditton. A sewage works should not be built at Honey Hill... Read more