Filter
East Anglia ONE North Offshore Windfarm

Relevant representations (registration comments)

Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.

Showing 701 to 750 of 878 representations, newest first.

Results per page View 25 results per page | 50 | View 100 results per page

  • Susan Emmerson

    I would not like to see this beautiful country side destroyed. Why can’t it stay down Sizewell? You have taken all Sizewell away from what it was when we where children.Our great grandchilden will... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 26 January 2020

  • Sybella Zisman

    1 The 'onshore development area' is defined within the NTS is inadequate as it does not detail the road network (in particular the B1121) required to access the proposed onshore substation(s) or the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 26 January 2020

  • The Aldeburgh Bookshop Ltd (The Aldeburgh Bookshop Ltd)

    I would like to object to the proposed development because I think it could be sited either at sea via what is decribed to us as a ring main out at sea submerged and not destroying the countryside in... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 26 January 2020

  • The Sheppard Family (The Sheppard Family)

    In this area we have Sizewell C perhaps on the horizon, which will be massive. Obviously it will have a huge affect on Minsmere Bird Reserve; they're building houses on good agricultural land as fast... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 26 January 2020

  • Tony Cooper

    We want to express our objections to Scottish Power Renewables onshore proposals for EA1N & EA2. Every aspect of the onshore proposal is potentially highly damaging to the area’s environment, economy... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 26 January 2020

  • Vanessa Sturridge

    I wish to object to this Scottish Power Renewables planning application because of the damage it will do to the Suffolk Heritage Coast area and its communities. There appears to be no nationwide plan... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 26 January 2020

  • Victoria Oaksey

    i own a share in a building at Sizewell that is directly in view of the proposed work. Therefore i feel involved in all the work proposed by East Anglia 1 North and East Anglia 2. i also feel very... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 26 January 2020

  • Yvonne Edge

    These plans to build massive industrial substations at Grove Wood are dangerous and damaging. They will also devastate a large area of the Suffolk Coast & Heaths AONB, causing irreparable damage to... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 26 January 2020

  • A Mackintosh

    I have lived all my life in this area and go regularly to the area that will be affected by this industrial construction. This is aa important area for wild like in general and birds in particular... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 27 January 2020

  • A V Dearden

    In simple terms the impact of the windfarm and sub station development at Friston is too much for this small rural community. It seems extraordinary that the substation cannot be located at Sizewell... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 27 January 2020

  • Alan Bryant

    I support all the concerns raised and representations being made by SASES and Friston Parish Council in respect of Scottish Power’s EA1N Project.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 27 January 2020

  • Alan Hallett

    I am a firm supporter of th eneed to shift our energy policy toward renewables - but this proposal is not suitable for the area, on a number of grounds. Most importantly, the site imposes an... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 27 January 2020

  • Alde and Ore Association (Alde and Ore Association)

    Response from the Alde and Ore Association (Registered Charity number 1154583) The Alde and Ore Association exists to protect for the public benefit the Alde, Ore and Butley rivers and their banks... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 27 January 2020

  • Alexander Gilmore

    Dear Examining Authority, RE: EAST ANGLIA ONE NORTH I wish to object to this ScottishPower Renewables planning application, for the following reasons: - Use of unspoilt countryside at Friston for... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 27 January 2020

  • Amanda Jinks

    I am opposed to this area being used for onshore infrastructure supporting East Anglia North One. This area of the Suffolk Coast and Heaths is an AONB and a unique area of the UK, attracting visitors... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 27 January 2020

  • Andrew McDonald

    I am a Suffolk resident, and live and work in Sudbourne, near the coast of East Suffolk. I have been closely involved in planning matters in East Suffolk as a Parish Councillor, but wish to register... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 27 January 2020

  • Angela de Mille

    Dear Examining Authority I am appalled at the proposals for both East Anglia North One (10077) for the following reasons: - The Thorpeness cliffs are incredibly fragile, soft sand and not suitable for... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 27 January 2020

  • Anglian Water Services Ltd (Anglian Water Services Ltd)

    Thank for you the opportunity to comment on the East Anglia One North Offshore Windfarm project. Anglian Water is considered to be a statutory consultee for nationally significant infrastructure... Read more

    Submitted by: Other statutory consultees
    Date submitted: 27 January 2020

  • Anne Warrack

    We are in favour of sustainable energy projects, but we cannot support these plans. They will have an unacceptable impact in every way on Aldeburgh and its neighbouring towns. There is no coordinated... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 27 January 2020

  • Annette Edge

    i DO NOT OBJECT TO OF-SHORE WINDFARMS BUT I DO OBJECT TO SEPARATE TRENCHING CARVING THROUGH OUR COUNTRYSIDE TO ACCOMMODATE ALL THE SEPARATE COMPANIES WHO WISH TO MAKE PROFIT FOR THEIR SHAREHOLDERS.... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 27 January 2020

  • Anthony Fincham

    This proposal will ruin a beautiful and pristine part of the Suffolk countryside and blight Friston and surrounding hamlets. In addition a 60 metre wide trench will be dug over 9 kilometres destroying... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 27 January 2020

  • Barnaby Mallinson

    The current plans for onshore infrastructure has a detrimental impact on the local wildlife, in particular, severing the Suffolk Coast and Heaths AONB and causing problems to migrating species and... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 27 January 2020

  • Beach View Holiday Park (Beach View Holiday Park)

    Beach View Holiday Park is a tourism business located north of Thorpeness and south of Sizewell. The onshore development requirements of energy proposals along the Suffolk Coast demands serious... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 27 January 2020

  • Beth Keys-Holloway

    I cannot believe that with all of the warnings and exposure of the importance of planting tress and conserving the natural world. We are still having these issues with companies wanting to come in and... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 27 January 2020

  • Bridget Chadwick

    As a resident of the Suffolk Coast & Heaths AONB and part of a family that has worked for decades to conserve the rare Sandlings heaths, I question how it can be a suitable place to build... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 27 January 2020

  • Bridget Walker

    I live locally and play golf at Thorpeness. This development will have a big impact on my day to day life. Having read the non-technical summary for this application I am very concerned. It seems to... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 27 January 2020

  • Campsea Ashe Parish Council (Campsea Ashe Parish Council)

    Campsea Ashe Parish Council support the representations made by SASES and Friston Parish Council. The cumulative impact of up to seven energy projects in East Suffolk will have a detrimental human... Read more

    Submitted by: Parish councils
    Date submitted: 27 January 2020

  • Caroline Feetham

    re planning application for EA North One: I wish to object to this planning application on the following grounds: -The deleterious impact of building the infrastructure necessary for this project... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 27 January 2020

  • Caroline Linehan

    I object to the plans to build huge electricity substations near the good village of Friston. The substations are too big and too close to a small rural village, the development will swamp and kill... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 27 January 2020

  • Cevanne Horrocks-Hopayian

    1 Damage to aquifers in Aldringham 2 Damage to aquatic environment in Aldringham 3 Lack of serious survey of rare insect populations in Aldringham, including glow worms and stag beetles in the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 27 January 2020

  • Charles Waple

    Dear Examining Authority, RE: EAST ANGLIA NORTH ONE I wish to object to this ScottishPower Renewables planning application, for the following reasons: - Cumulative impact on local communities of up to... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 27 January 2020

  • Charlotte de Mille

    Dear Examining Authority I am appalled at the proposals for both East Anglia North One (10077) for the following reasons: - The Thorpeness cliffs are incredibly fragile, soft sand and not suitable for... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 27 January 2020

  • Chris McAleer

    This proposal rides roughshod over Suffolk Coast and Heaths AONB with scant regard for the time, money and effort that has been spent creating one of the country's most important wildlife habitats.... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 27 January 2020

  • Christopher Burrell-Saward

    Totally unsuitable location on in ANOB except very close to Sizewell Power Station. Friston site for substation vastly impinges on village and community - noise and light pollution. Serious... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 27 January 2020

  • Colin Cheesman

    I’m aware of the need for more energy in the future, but I can’t support the proposed plan Scottish Power Renewables has submitted. I have been to the local public consultation exhibition in Aldeburgh... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 27 January 2020

  • Colin Pagram

    Cumulative impacts of numerous energy projects have not been assessed properly The process for selecting the site was flawed Brownfield areas should be considered The cable landing on fragile cliffs... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 27 January 2020

  • Craig Westwood

    I am 100% in favour of off-shore wind farms but I think that like most, did not expect that such large substations were required. In this case, the proposed locations are in a defined area of... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 27 January 2020

  • Daniel Gilmore

    - Cumulative impact on local communities of up to 7 energy projects - Unsuitability of Thorpeness Cliffs as site for landing cables - Use of unspoilt countryside at Friston for substation complexes... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 27 January 2020

  • Dave Robbie

    The plan to tear up the coast at Thorpness and the route to Friston will uneccesarily cause much distress and disruption to locals and tourists. The destruction caused by the substation in Friston... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 27 January 2020

  • David Seabrook

    I find these proposals totally unacceptable due to the long lasting negative impact that it will have on an area of outstanding national beauty, the impact in the local residents in terms of the value... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 27 January 2020

  • David Wood

    Harmful impact on the Protected Landscape.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 27 January 2020

  • Deborah Horrocks

    It will be a total eyesore, and at the detriment to wildlife and beauty of the countryside

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 27 January 2020

  • Derek Cook

    I fully support the representations being made by SASES and Friston Parish Council. I have concerns relating to the following; *Onshore Ecology- loss of 30 acres of wild life habitat, loss of nesting... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 27 January 2020

  • Derek Walduck

    I object to the proposals in Scottish Power Renewables' application for a DCO for East Anglia One, and agree with representations made by Snape Parish Council, Friston Parish Council, 31 other local... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 27 January 2020

  • Diana Turner

    I wish to object to this Scottish Power Renewables Planning Application for the following reasons: 1. The local road network is totally unsuitable for the proposed increased traffic and particularly... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 27 January 2020

  • Donald Wood

    Please see the letter provided with my views.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 27 January 2020
    Contains attachment(s)

  • Donna Savory

    I do not object to offshore wind farms. I object to the onshoring of such capacity which causes despoliation to the countryside. SPR will construct one of the largest substations in Europe in the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 27 January 2020

  • Dr Cathy Wardale

    I am writing to object to the Scottish Power Renewables planning application in the strongest possible terms. Although I fully support renewable energy, it seems to me that to desecrate a huge... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 27 January 2020

  • Dr Kay Laskey

    Tourism is almost our only industry in this Suffolk Coastal rural area. This project with both its disruption to the area for the coming years and the damage to the countryside during building and... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 27 January 2020

  • Dr Stuart Turner

    I am writing to you to object to the proposed Scottish Power substation in Friston. Although I support renewable energy, the decision making process so far regarding this project is seriously flawed.... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 27 January 2020