Rampion 2 Offshore Wind Farm

Relevant representations (registration comments)

Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.

Showing 201 to 250 of 425 representations, newest first.

Results per page View 25 results per page | 50 | View 100 results per page

  • Karen fisher

    Renewable energy is the future, we cannot continue to rely on fossil fuels

  • Lance Johnson

    I have major concerns about the stability of the caravan standing due to major earth works; pollution from dust, noise and traffic as well as a detrimental effect on natural habitats which have been... Read more

  • Margaret Johnston

    There was a failure to consult correctly. There are significant environmental issues if this goes ahead in the planned area. Substation at Wineham Lane would be a more suitable site. A272 access would... Read more

  • Matthew Oakes

    I fully support the expansion of the wind farm. The UK needs more green energy.

  • Michael Charles Leete

    I oppose the Rampion 2 project for the following reasons:- 1. It will have an adverse effect on our local environment because the turbines would 2.5 times the height of Rampion 1 and very visible from... Read more

  • Batcheller Monkhouse (Batcheller Monkhouse) on behalf of Mrs Nicola Crichton-Brown (Mrs Nicola Crichton-Brown)

    31 October 2023 Our Ref: DNB785/HC The Planning Inspectorate National Infrastructure Directorate Temple Quay House Temple Quay Bristol BS1 6PN Dear Sirs, [REDACTED] Rampion 2 response to section 56... Read more

  • Network Rail Infrastructure Limited (Network Rail Infrastructure Limited)

    1. We act for Network Rail Infrastructure Limited (Network Rail) and have been instructed to submit relevant representations on its behalf. As a statutory undertaker affected by the proposed DCO we... Read more

  • Nikki Tees

    The short term and long term effects to local marine life will never fully recover from the installation. The equipment, such as the blades are not recyclable, so the benefits re energy production do... Read more

  • Paul Cross

    More detail required exactly where the proposed cabling will come ashore. Elmer and Climping are both missing from the map. The noise from piling will be intolerable for Elmer residents. Sea bed... Read more

  • Meera Smethurst on behalf of Peter Black (Peter Black)

    Dear Sir / Madam, As long-term residents, we are writing to express our extreme concern and absolute opposition to the use of Dragons Lane for this project. The lane is simply not suitable for heavy... Read more

  • Rt Hon Jeremy Quin MP

    Potential impact on constituents.

  • Spencer Shires

    I object to the increased height of the new turbines, and the fact that it will fence in the south coast causing a barrier to the migratory routes of our at risk bird population not to mention the... Read more

  • Sue Piercy

    We are very concerned about the impact the Rampion 2 proposal will have on the area around where we live. Aside from Rampion 2 being very much an Onshore development (despite being touted as an... Read more

  • Susan Edna Baker

    I approve of green energy initiatives. Although the sea bed will be damaged by building the turbines, once they are built the sea bed should be left alone to colonise with sea grasses and weeds. I... Read more

  • TC Rampion OFTO Ltd (TC Rampion OFTO Ltd)

    TC Rampion OFTO Limited owns and operates the offshore transmission system associated with the Rampion offshore windfarm. This includes the offshore substation, on and offshore cables, the Twineham... Read more

  • Worthing British Sub Aqua Club 1323 (Worthing British Sub Aqua Club 1323)

    This response represents the views of members of Worthing BSAC dive club #1323, also members of Guildford BSAC who regularly dive this area. This is our contribution of feedback to the proposals... Read more

  • Zachary Wingfield

    I approve

  • BARRY MILES

    This dreadful proposal is characterised by having minimum benefits and maximum drawbacks despite huge costs:- -We are being asked to accept what is being described as only an ”extension” to the... Read more

  • Ben Morris

    the timescale and potential noise, dust and unknown people

  • David John Clarke

    Tourism is absolutely vital to the West Sussex coastal community and hence to the wellbeing of all residents. Given the catastrophic scale of fires which broke out in Southern Europe and elsewhere... Read more

  • EBRA (EBRA)

    I live very close to the sea here, in Littlehampton. I try and swim in the sea daily unless the tides are too choppy and always avoid looking east, where Rampion 1 scars the skyline. The very idea of... Read more

  • Emily Mulcare-Ball

    I object to the proposals for Rampion II. I believe Oakendene was chosen as during the initial stages there were very few objections from the Cowfold area as local people were unaware of the size and... Read more

  • Gillian Henn

    The planet is dying, and if we don’t do this as part of the bigger picture of using green energy so will we. Even if you do not agree with climate change isn’t it better to have it than not. I see the... Read more

  • JANE KOSZUTA

    The money involved should be used for research into using LESS electricity, and nobody knows what the impact on the local environment will be, whether on land or in the sea.

  • Jason Sangster

    Don’t do it. More wind and less disruptions to the seaside towns between the IOW and Selsey

  • John Morton

    The local impact must be given more significantly consideration especially for a project that has dubious merits, are Rampion’s claims about the energy they can produce justified/ accurate, is the... Read more

  • Maria Natale Hacon

    I refer to the most recent letter received from Rampion 2 / RWE dated 25th September 2023 re The Rampion 2 Offshore Wind Farm Order 202X. I, Maria Hacon, am one of the four Trustees of land located at... Read more

  • National Highways (National Highways)

    National Highways ('NH') act as the statutory consultee on behalf of the Department for Transport Secretary of State with regards planning matters, including DCOs. We will be concerned with proposals... Read more

  • Olivia Ball

    I object to the proposals. I believe that the DCO proposal represents a material change, and is now so different from the one consulted on, that it requires a reopening of the consultation: I would... Read more

  • Patrick Clayton

    Offshore wind farms bring significant benefits for the UK in terms of energy self-sufficiency. They help reduce the use of fossil fuels which are contributing to a rise in sea levels and which should... Read more

  • Ruth Aldred

    Please do not build the Rampion 2 substation right next to Cowfold village. We are a village not an Industrial Revolution. If you ask Sussex Police I am sure they will support the objections,... Read more

  • Sally Lewis

    Being a frequent visitor to the west sussex coast with friends and family living on the coast it is essential that the local impact must be given more significantly consideration especially for a... Read more

  • Sara Taiyo

    I'm excited to hear about the application for an area up to approximately 196km2 comprising up to 90 wind turbines and associated foundations, inter-array cables connecting the turbines to up to three... Read more

  • HENRY ADAMS (HENRY ADAMS) on behalf of SUSIE CLARE FISCHEL (SUSIE CLARE FISCHEL)

    Rampion 2 Offshore Windfarm Project - Application for development consent order (‘DCO’) REPRESENTATIONS ON BEHALF OF SUSIE CLARE FISCHEL OF [REDACTED] 1st November 2023. Management [REDACTED] extends... Read more

  • UK Health Security Agency (UK Health Security Agency)

    Thank you for your consultation regarding the above development. The UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) welcomes the opportunity to comment on your proposals at this stage of the project. Please note... Read more

  • Alec Lauder

    I have occupied [REDACTED] on a seasonal basis since 1996. My family and I have greatly enjoyed the peace and quiet that prevails in the surrounding area as well as the prospect over open fields and I... Read more

  • Andrew Griffith Member of Parliament for Arundel and South Downs

    I am writing in my capacity as Member of Parliament for Arundel and South Downs to register as an Interested Party in relation to RWE’s application for the construction of the Rampion 2 Offshore... Read more

  • Angela D Warr-King FRICS

    I spend most weekends in Nyetimber/Pagham close to Aldwick Bay and object to Rampion 2. The 22 miles of coastal wind turbines,only 8 miles offshore and 140m tall,will have an enormous visual impact on... Read more

  • Anthony Woolfenden

    I am strongly against the wind farm proposals which I believe will cause major damage to the environment, major disruption to develop, and questionable value and effectiveness. Among my concerns about... Read more

  • Carol Matthews

    This project t will adversely affect the flow of traffic on an already congested arterial road

  • Chiara Angela Vagnarelli

    My serious concerns: Disruption to the eco-system during the 5 year construction phase. This would include the movement of Dolphins and any Harbour Porpoises from the Bay, they could move up to 50... Read more

  • Christopher Nigel Guy

    1) The wider effect of an immediate traffic-bottleneck lasting many years. 2) Unacceptable increase of air pollution (caused by 1) with specific effect in Cowfold. 3) Adverse environmental impact of... Read more

  • Cowfold Parish Council (Cowfold Parish Council)

    Rampion 2 Offshore Wind Farm Development Consent Order Letter of Representation from Cowfold Parish Council – dated 2 November 2023 This letter of representation is made by Cowfold Parish Council on... Read more

  • Donovan Harrison

    I would like to record my opposition for the proposed development of the Rampion 2 Sub-Station at Oakendene for a number of reasons; - the local impact on traffic management created by the need to... Read more

  • Eleanor Owens

    I travel very short distances through cowfold, Horsham and partridge green for work as a gardener. It’s already such a struggle to keep to my timetable due to traffic and this will make it impossible... Read more

  • Elizabeth Rosaline Anne Hammond

    The proposed turbines should be at least 14 miles off shore according to government guidelines. This would mean that shipping would be affected. There are many sites that are far more suitable and... Read more

  • Findlay Walter

    I think it’s a brilliant idea

  • Gordon Murphy

    As someone who dives and recreationally fishes the area, I can see that Rampion has been a massive benefit to sea life, partly due to the addition of massive amounts of underwater structure. Now it is... Read more

  • Guy Everett

    My main concern is the visual impact from both the Sussex coast and National Park. The new turbines are 2.5 x bigger than existing Rampion 1 and bigger than recommended by the Government given the... Read more

  • Hubbard Fisheries ltd (Hubbard Fisheries ltd)

    Impact of fisheries in and around the proposed Rampion 2 build site. - Environmental impacts (damage to fish and shellfish stocks etc). - Movement of sediment/aggregate. Increasing the risk of... Read more