Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.
-
This is a WORLD Heritage site and should be shown respect as such.
Our country is suffering badly from the current political farce, proceeding with this project will do everlasting damage to the...
Read more
-
The proposed plans are just too damaging to our heritage.
-
I would like to urge all concerned to protect this unique piece of our landscape and not to build a tunnel that will harm it. The most straightforward option to improve the flow of traffic is to widen...
Read more
-
The heritage site of Stonehenge has already been disturbed by tourist facilities. To further destroy its important energetic importance would be a travesty. Please leave well alone any more building...
Read more
-
I object to your proposals on ecological, environmental and archaeological grounds.
-
I would like to suggest two points for consideration...
1. I suggest there should be provision for the A360 to be rerouted from Longbarrow junction along (i) the new A303 across the River Till,...
Read more
-
I do object to this sad proposed spoiling of an incomparable site. I appreciate that much money has already been spent on the present proposal, but future generations will look at this development...
Read more
-
This application is for a road to be built atop an area surrounding an ancient monument which should be considered sacred. These monuments are the U.K.'s heritage. We should not be building or...
Read more
-
I object to the current plan for the A303 around Stonehenge because:
(1) It is not far enough away from the extensive site to not cause irrepairable damage to the site itself, the other areas such as...
Read more
-
As an archaeologists and university lecturer I Am deeply concerned about the irreparable damage that will be done to Stonehenge and the WHS. Already the immensely important site at Black Mead has been...
Read more
-
Totally support the motion.
Unbelievable that this should even be considered.
-
I am deeply concerned and troubled by the whole process. The area in and around Stonehenge has so much rich and vital history yet to be uncovered. I’m concerned that authorities are quite happy to...
Read more
-
Is made on the grounds that the scheme will plough straight through a world heritage site without understanding the context of the wider, unexplored archaeology. It is also a site sacred to me, and...
Read more
-
My concerns about the impact upon a historical and religious site of international importance
-
Stone henge is of such social and historical significance,
That it is offensive to suggest that allowing a tunnel to be excavated underneath it is anything other than an insult.
Protect our...
Read more
-
A monument that has been there for thousands of years and, one hopes, will continue to be there for further thousands of years should not be damaged in any way by the actions of this generation of...
Read more
-
Stonehenge is a site of huge importance. Not only to the history of the UK but also to that of the world. This cannot be overstated. The key importance in this is the word "site." It is not simply...
Read more
-
I feel that this Proposal will cause irreparable damage to this World Heritage Site, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’.
Please take on board that...
Read more
-
I am registering my own views on the proposed A303 Stonehenge Expressway .As far as I am concerned, this proposal will result in:
• Irreparable damage to Stonehenge, which is a World Heritage...
Read more
-
Stonehenge is an ancient historical sight and as such should be protected from and all damaging actions. Our history cannot be replaced. Digging in under the sight or in the immediate vacinity...
Read more
-
1. The proposals include dualling the A303 through the World Heritage Site of which Stonehenge forms a part, which will cause major damage thereto, as has been underlined by a UNESCO report.
2....
Read more
-
The entire site should be protected and preserved for visitors and for archaeology - a tunnel is far too intrusive expensive and unnecessary
-
Besides the impact on the setting of the ancient Stonehenge Avenue, I am also concerned about the permanent negative effects to Neolithic and Bronze Age cemeteries, to the Blick Mead Mesolithic site,...
Read more
-
It is unbelievable that this investigation is actually going ahead. These historical sites are our heritage and we should be proud to have them in our country. Once any alterations take place it will...
Read more
-
I am concerned about any further damage to black Mead. And I am also concerned with disturbing wild birds in the area. This project should not move forward.