Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.
-
I am very concerned about the paucity of alternative options in consultation that would not damage the World Heritage Site. The environmental and archaeological impact of this scheme would be...
Read more
-
I feel that the whole of the world heritage site must be protected from further damage and that the proposal would do irreparable damage to areas within it.
It would also prevent future...
Read more
-
I believe that the current project plan should be rejected owing to a combination of:
a) the expected damage to the Stonehenge Landscape, the consequent risk to WHS status, the consequent long term...
Read more
-
It goes almost without saying that Stonehenge is the most important prehistoric site in these islands. It is clear to many within the historical and archaeological communities that the proposed...
Read more
-
I believe that the roadway will cause irreparable damage to the World Heritage Site archaeology.
UNESCO’s international advisers have said that the scheme should not go ahead in its present form....
Read more
-
Stonehenge is a world heritage site. In many ways it is an icon of Britain. As such it needs to be cared for, and not made subject to the whims and fancies of the imaginary demands of infrastructure...
Read more
-
Irreparable damage to the WHS, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’
UNESCO’s international advisers say the scheme should not go ahead in its present...
Read more
-
This is an abominable idea which infringes on a centuries old site and will be irreparable. We do not know if future advances in archaeology and science could bring us more information and this would...
Read more
-
This is an incredible, world renowned historic site. Some preparatory excavations have already caused irreparable damage to proudly undiscovered relics. This surely cannot be allowed you continue....
Read more
-
I am a designer and consultant with great interest and involvement in historic landscapes and art.
As a onetime Director with The John Lewis Partnership I have learned about satisfying customers and...
Read more
-
1 The proposal will cause irreparable damage to the WHS, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’
2 UNESCO’s international advisers say the scheme should...
Read more
-
I am concerned about the Highways Agency scheme for the A303 in the vicinity of Stonehenge for the following reasons :
1] The likelihood of irretrievable damage to the World Heritage Site
2] The...
Read more
-
I am concerned about irreversible damage to this outstanding WHS, its archaeology and setting, which is described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’. I understand that UNESCO’s international...
Read more
-
Irreparable damage to the WHS, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’
UNESCO’s international advisers say the scheme should not go ahead in its present...
Read more
-
I would like to provide personal views on the final plan that reflect needs of the southern Till valley to protect wildlife and ecology, support local communities and businesses, provide for genuine...
Read more
-
I oppose the current plans for the road building to be completed around the Stone henge and surrounding countryside!
-
This proposed road development, or Expressway, will be a blot on the landscape - rather like a motorway etched into a World Heritage Site. It is not just all the upheaval and impairment to the...
Read more
-
I object to the proposed A303 Stonehenge as it will damage historic Stonehenge, a World Heritage Site, which should be preserved as it is one of Britain's oldest and most famous cultural treasures....
Read more
-
The underlying layers of archaeological history will be lost if a tunnel is made under Stonehenge for future generations.
-
Stone Henge is a world heritage site. It is of immense importance to me personally and to the country on a national level as it connects us strongly to the wisdom of our ancestors. Therefore it needs...
Read more
-
I am concerned about the proposals for the A303 at Stonehenge. Primarily, I am concerned about the possible destruction of unexcavated archaeological sites in an area that has remained undisturbed for...
Read more
-
I believe that other options, less damaging to the site's unique archaeology, have not been fully explored and that irreversible damage is likely to be caused as a result.
-
I am extremely concerned about the impact of the proposals on the ancient site of Stonehenge. It is imperative that we preserve this important part of our heritage.
-
1. This is a unique world heritage site - the whole landscape, not just the stones.
2. UNESCO is not supporting the scheme.
3. There are no alternative options that would not damage the site in the...
Read more
-
I am concerned about the environmental impact of the proposal particularly so close to a World Heritage site
-
I feel that there would be irreparable damage to this unique Heritage site that has visitors from all over the world. Advisers from UNESCO say this scheme shouldn't go ahead as planned. Also I...
Read more
-
Any alteration of the road system in the area of Stonehenge would in my opinion alter the sanctity of the landscape. Probably in your opinion not a very valid, however not everything has to be...
Read more
-
It is about the lives of the creatures who live in the area and they will lose their habitats.
-
Very Simply
I regard Stonehenge as a sacred site for all humanity.
The proposed changes to the road system are not only destructive to the land but also to the essence of this site on every...
Read more
-
Damage to heritage site.
Impact on wildlife.
Noise from roads.
Encourage more traffic and car use.
-
I will be opposing the current plans for the A303 express way.
-
I am concerned about the damage to this unique site that has already been done - Blick Mead, and will be done further under this scheme. This is priceless history that will be lost forever. Build a...
Read more
-
I do not fully understand all your proposals but as a Pagan who cares about the land, I know this will destroy the ley line energies associated with Stonehenge and the other monuments. It will spoil...
Read more
-
This scheme will cause irreparable damage to the World Heritage Ste, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel.
-
The proposed underpass development is not comprehensive enough to protect the area surrounding Stonehenge which is also of major archaeological significance.
-
I am concerned about the potentially detrimental impact of the proposals for road changes around the Stonehenge site and immediate vicinity with particular relevance to;
1. archaeological impact -...
Read more
-
I object to the proposal on the following grounds:
1. That there is significant risk of damage to an area of enormous international archeological significance.
2. That I believe that it a waste...
Read more
-
I am against any development that threatens Stonehenge.
-
As a frequent traveller on this route, I am aware of the traffic and scenic issues involved. However, this World Heritage Site, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’, must take...
Read more
-
I am objecting to this scheme as it will cause irreparable damage to one of the greatest archaeological sites sites in the world, which has yet to be fully excavated. It will also separate the...
Read more
-
There are countless quantities of 'unknown archeology' around the site of Stonehenge and the surrounding countryside. The damage you will do to this site is irreparable not only to the geological...
Read more
-
I am very concerned that this construction will cause damage which can never be undone to the archaeology of what is a WORLD a heritage site. This is not a site which the UK alone should be allowed...
Read more
-
The Stonehenge site and surrounding area is described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’. This is a unique site which we hold in trust for future generations. The current proposals for the...
Read more
-
Irreparable damage to the WHS, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’.
UNESCO’s international advisers say the scheme should not go ahead in its present...
Read more
-
The world heritage site should be respected as an archaeological and educational resource that remains intact for generations to come.
-
The proposal will cause damage to the unique environment surrounding Stonehenge. The entire area is as important as the stones themselves. If not, we could move the stones elsewhere. So we have to...
Read more
-
These are my reasons to object:
- Irreparable damage to this WHS, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’;
- UNESCO’s international advisers say the...
Read more
-
The importance of this site - not only in the UK, but within the global setting of it, - has not yet even been partially understood! Especially in terms of its links to other cultures of similar eras,...
Read more
-
Damage and desecration to not only a world heritage site but a sacred site to many Britons including myself, the landscape is rare and must not be damaged further.
-
I am really concerned about the effects of tunneling in the area around Stonehenge on the potential archeology of the area.
While the actual tunnel itself is problematic, there is also risk to...
Read more