Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.
-
I'm interested in keeping the rights of way open to allow access to all forms of transport.
I'm concerned that these will be shut or full access not given.
-
User of public rights of way specifically Byways Open to all Traffic (BOAT)
-
I am deeply concerned about the proposed A303 Expressway mainly on the grounds of:
A. Damage to the site: Stonehenge is not just to do with the stones themselves but the landscape in which in they...
Read more
-
I believe that all byways should be kept open for all to enjoy. Not only are they a superb way of seeing the countryside in local area but also provide hours of enjoyment for the people who use them
-
I intend to make points regarding the need for byways to remain open to all users including motor vehicle's, both for leisure and acess purposes.
To make points regarding acess to the land around...
Read more
-
I am opposed to plans to 'improve' the A303 which seem to be in reckless disregard for preservation of the world heritage site. It concerns me that advice from UNESCO is not being listened to. I am...
Read more
-
I object to the proposed scheme as it will irreparably damage a site of national and global importance. The site should be preserved for the benefit of future generations and not affected by the short...
Read more
-
I enjoy the byways and interested in keeping them open for all to enjoy
-
I wish state interest in public rights of way that need protecting. Small section of A303 will need to become BOAT to prevent existing byways becoming dead ends.
-
i wish to help try and protect the public rights of ways surrounding stonehenge.
-
I would like to protest to this action and protect the historic rights of way in this country.
Both rights of wat and Stone Henge have co-existed for many centuries without the need for legislation....
Read more
-
Public rights of way need to be protected and remain open to all users.
-
I am regestering my opposition to closure or modification of public rights of way around the Stonehenge area. Public rights of way should be preserved.
-
I am concerned about the impact on, and likely irreparable damage to, the WHS of Stonehenge, and I note that UNESCO recommends that the scheme should not proceed in its present form.
I am also...
Read more
-
THERE IS A CHEAPER, BETTER AND LESS RISKY SOLUTION
There is ABSOLUTELY NO NEED for the road to take the proposed route. Instead there are other much cheaper, better and easier ways to solve the issue...
Read more
-
Construction of a new roadway, that causes irreparable damage, a view which is supported by [Redacted], is highly irresponsible.
Other options have not been pursued with serious intent, they have...
Read more
-
Preservation: This site of Antiquity and history must be maintained in the state of it's original purpose when constructed.
Global Outcry: The eyes of the world will be unfavorably placed upon the...
Read more
-
Irreparable damage to the WHS, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’
UNESCO’s international advisers say the scheme should not go ahead in its present...
Read more
-
The proposed scheme would cause irreparable damage to this world famous archaeological site. The proposed scheme has been roundly condemned by local, national and international authorities including...
Read more
-
The plans for the tunnel do not adequately protect this wonderful UNESCO site.
The tunnel will bring faster, noisier traffic, there will be no ability to view the stones from the road, and this...
Read more
-
This road scheme will cause huge damage to as yet unexplored archaeological sites.
It will be a noisy and visual intrusion on a precious open landscape.
It will encourage more motor traffic which...
Read more
-
As a previous native citizen of Salisbury who has visited Stonehenge, I am deeply concerned that any major engineering work (including, but not limited to, excavation) in the vicinity of the monument...
Read more
-
Stonehenge is a unique world heritage site and extremely special, it should not be devalued or encroached on by a road
James Knight
-
I believe that the plans (subject to necessary and appropriate consultation with interested parties must be pursued. The traffic delays caused by the status quo are severely damaging to the South...
Read more
-
The proposed infrastructure would cause irreparable damage to the world heritage site, which is one of the most important landmarks in the UK
-
Dear Sirs,
I am writing to you as a very concerned UK citizen, at the moment living and working in Chicago, USA .
I am writing with regards to the planning proposal for the A303 Stonehenge...
Read more
-
These plans will cause irreparable damage to the UNESCO World Heritage Site, its archaeology and setting. UNESCO has described the area as a ‘landscape without parallel’ and their international...
Read more
-
I have been following the Blick Mead Mesolithic site since it's discovery and feel that it is of massive interest and importance - there is much more to learn there.
I feel the loss of the view of...
Read more
-
I object to the proposal
• It will cause Irreparable damage to the WHS, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’
•UNESCO’s international advisers say the...
Read more
-
It is my belief that the tunnel as currently proposed will cause irreparable damage to the archaeology of this precious prehistoric landscape which no amount of mitigation will suffice. The proposals...
Read more
-
Stonehenge is a word heritage site and is of national and international importance. Archeological discoveries are being made and are just scratching the surface of our understanding of this emense...
Read more
-
Although the scheme is in principle good, the is a single major issue which remains very alarming: the location of the western tunnel portal and approach cutting. Archaeological sensitivity requires...
Read more
-
This is a World Heritage site and must be protected under strict rules and this work would mean this would not be protected. Approval from the world heritage organisation must be sort.
We protect...
Read more
-
I am concerned about the high risk of geological stresses this project puts on an area of such unparalleled cultural, historical and emotional importance, not only to the natives of Britain but to...
Read more
-
Rwy'n gwrthwynebu'r niwed a gynigir i Gôr y Cewr. Mae'n safle sanctaidd ac ni ddylid ei niweidio o dan eich gofal. Mae'r wefan hon wedi cael ei barchu am filoedd o flynyddoedd ac ni ddylech dderbyn...
Read more
-
lIrreparable damage to the WHS, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’
UNESCO’s international advisers say the scheme should not go ahead in its present...
Read more
-
I object to the irreparable damage that the A303 proposed tunnel will do to Stonehenge WHS
-
Stonehenge alone is not the whole matter. The landscape itself is a historic monument which should not be interfered with for the convenience of those driving through. One point of the Henge itself is...
Read more
-
I object to your plans to dig a tunnel through this historic site
-
I am concerned about the destruction of valuable achaeological sites that the new road would destroy. I also believe that some wild life will lose their habitat.Also Stone Henge as a sacred site will...
Read more
-
Irreparable damage to the WHS, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’ and I feel that not enough is being done to preserve it.
UNESCO’s...
Read more
-
In summary my representation is that as a member of the public I wish to be able to contribute my views on this matter. I do take my family by car to visit Stonehenge and I use the road that has been...
Read more
-
Irreparable damage to the WHS, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’
UNESCO’s international advisers say the scheme should not go ahead in its present...
Read more
-
I object to the proposed A303 Stonehenge Expressway for the following reasons:-
1. It would do irreparable damage to the Stonehenge World Heritage Site (WHS), its archaeology and its setting. UNESCO...
Read more
-
The unique site of Blick Mead represents the oldest site of the Stonehenge archaeological landscape, dating back to the Mesolithic period c.10,000 - 8,000 BC. As such, it places the monument and...
Read more
-
I am worried about damage to the site. I believe that profit will take precedence over the protection of the Stones.
-
I am very concerned about the impact that the A303 Stonehenge Expressway will have on this most sensitive World Heritage Site
-
This plan is terrible. It endangers a World Heritage site, will disturb and destroy important archaeology, cause increased noise in the area of the WHS and harm wildlife.
We should not be building...
Read more
-
As a citizen of the United States of America and as a global citizen, I would like to express my concern regarding continuance and completion of this upcoming project. While I understand and...
Read more
-
I object to the construction of the A303 Stonehenge Expressway because of the damage it would do to the World Heritage Site, and to the Blick Mead Mesolithic site.