Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.
-
I'm very concerned about the lack of public walking routes there will be once tunnel is dug. On the current plans it looks like I won't be able to walk,run from larkhill,or along kings barrows area....
Read more
-
The possibility that there might be any damage to this World Heritage Site, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’ is one of the most distructive plans to...
Read more
-
Butterfly Conservation wishes to be an Interested Party at the forthcoming examination for the following reasons:
1. We wish to ensure that effects on chalk grassland and hedgerow habitats that...
Read more
-
Stonehenge is an iconic piece of British heritage. I am appalled at the negative effect the proposal will have on this ancient landscape and the lands surrounding it which are of massive and unique...
Read more
-
The proposed scheme risks irreversible damage to the wider ceremonial landscape in which the henge is set. Already damage has been done to Blick Mead, with Auroch traces being disturbed. The site is...
Read more
-
Very bad plan because damage to surroundings and wildlife plus too much traffic noises.
-
The Government proposes to widen the A303 trunk road to the south west. This road crosses the iconic Stonehenge World Heritage Site (WHS), which has been called “the most archaeologically significant...
Read more
-
The new proposed road across the River Till valley in Winterbourne Stoke is to high and will be extremely noisy for the village and will be environmentally damaging, on the previous plan that was...
Read more
-
I am a resident of Shrewton and a very keen horse rider and carriage driver and am therefore very interested in the impacts on the local rights of way. I hope that the project will improve the access...
Read more
-
I register my interest in the proposed tunnel at Stonehenge.
Damage has already been done to the World Heritage site at Blick Mead, it would be tragic and irresponsible to compound it with this...
Read more
-
It must be questioned whether this scheme represents a good use of Government money for transport, noting that the initial BCR (0.23 or 0.21 depending on funding options) would make the scheme...
Read more
-
As a World important site I feel that Stonehenge must be protected for future generations, and that we must show that we are serious about conservation, being an example to other countries.Thus the...
Read more
-
The route of the A303 passes through, and near, terrain containing priceless historical and prehistoric remains that will be irrevocably changed, or totally destroyed by the proposed work. Even if the...
Read more
-
I believe the majority of previous representations have been a combination of those against and "don't knows". The tunnel is clearly being railroaded through as part of the project in spite of this...
Read more
-
I do not agree with the tunnel ,as it destroying archaeological sites. If you don't want people slowing down to look at Stonehenge,plant some trees.. and out up signs for people to park on the byway...
Read more
-
The proposed scheme would cause significant and irreparable damage to an already threatened and compromised landscape and World Heritage monument and to the wildlife of the area
-
I feel the excavation will make irreparable damage to a site of national and international importance.
The area has not been fully explored and we have made new discoveries about the area in the last...
Read more
-
I am concerned about the irreparable damage to the World Heritage Site landscape.
Emphasis on heritage, it is a sacred landscape.
-
In my view the proposed tunnel is too short and cuts into the World Heritage site, I agree with the concerns raised by UNESCO
-
I regard the proposal as destructive to the World Heritage Site. I object to the loss of the view of Stonehenge from the road. The ecolological damage is already clear and insupportable. The actions...
Read more
-
I wish to object to the plans to build a tunnel along the A303 to move the road from the environs of Stonehenge which would further damage this archealogically rich area.
I also feel that the...
Read more
-
My deep concerns about the application are as follows :
1. Irreparable damage to the World Heritage Site of Stonehenge, its archaeology and surroundings, eg Blick Mead Mesolithic site; it is...
Read more
-
I find it abhorrent that such a proposal is being muted.It flies in the face of all of our work to reduce carbon emissions by reducing vehicle use.This is a heritage site and is outstandingly...
Read more
-
I am convinced this is a serious threat to one of the most archaeologically important landscapes in the world.
I also think the loss of the view of Stonehenge from the existing road would reduce...
Read more
-
I think that this tunnel will seriously damage the sensitive and still undiscovered archaeology of the area. Interfere with the surrounding environment. All the groundwork & digging of a tunnel could...
Read more
-
I consider the proposed A303 Stonehenge Expressway will have a considerable detrimental impact on this important heritage site and will make a representation based on the following points:
The...
Read more
-
I do not want the tunnel to go ahead. I think it will be devastating to the archeology of a ancient environment
-
I want to ensure that the drove and stonehenge is kept open for us all to enjoy, as it was intended.
-
This submission concerns two aspects of archaeological research within the Stonehenge landscape: (1) impacts on the western part of the WHS; (2) future advances in field methods. My research...
Read more
-
1. The proposed work will damage the WHS, especially beyond the western portal to the western boundary of the WHS where a substantial area would be rendered archaeologically ‘sterile’. This will...
Read more
-
I would like to lodge my objections to the proposed A303 tunnel project. It is my view that this will cause unnecessary damage to archaeological assets both known and yet to be found/researched. I am...
Read more
-
Written Representation WCSRT as Interested Party for Examination of Highways England A303 Stonehenge Development Consent Order
The Wessex Chalk Stream and Rivers Trust (WCSRT)
WCSRT is an...
Read more
-
I am opposed to Highways England's massively destructive road scheme of the World Heritage and a national sacred site that is Stonehenge. You really should leave ancient and sacred sites alone. What...
Read more
-
The Stonehenge landscape is rich and full of remains of the ancient history of our ancestors. There is not much of our ancient landscapes left in this country due to land ownership, development, and...
Read more
-
I intend to object due to
The damage to the WHS and its archaeology which is described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’
UNESCO’s international advisers say the scheme should not go ahead...
Read more
-
Stonehenge was gifted to 'the people' with certain conditions attached. One of which was that the ground should remain undisturbed. For this reason I object to the planned tunnels.
-
I believe that the introduction of a tunnel under the landscape of Stonehenge will greatly dame its prestige and sense of place as part of the UNESCO world Heritage Status. By digging up the land with...
Read more
-
This is a unique site in the world. It should be protected from any potential damage.
-
1.ease of access byway 11,12...for equinox, solstice ceremonies, praying, meditating etc... Budhist connection, non religuos.. Ceremonies should remane open as chartered in 1926 given to the people.....
Read more
-
1. The above-ground works will have a negative impact on the WHS, especially beyond the western portal where a substantial area will become archaeologically ‘sterile’. This will permanently damage a...
Read more
-
Our response relates only to the works in the vicinity of Rollestone Crossroads.
We respond as owners and farmers of the land to the SW and SE of the existing crossroads.
1. We note that the...
Read more
-
The Stonehenge landscape is rich and full of remains of the ancient history of our ancestors. There is not much of our ancient landscapes left in this country due to land ownership and development. As...
Read more
-
Thank you for the opportunity to make written representation with regard to the western section of the proposed Amesbury to Berwick Down A303 road scheme. This representation will cover 7 issues: ...
Read more
-
I'm writing this to protect at the tunnel at Stonehenge.
-
Stonehenge is sacred to my ancestors, and my gods. Leave it alone.Thou shalt not.
-
Thank you for the opportunity to make written representation with regard to the western section of the proposed Amesbury to Berwick Down A303 road scheme. This representation will cover 7 issues: ...
Read more
-
1) The height of the viaduct as proposed on the A303 northern bypass of Winterbourne Stoke is FAR TOO HIGH. The impact it will have on those who LIVE in the village of Winterbourne Stoke should be...
Read more
-
Stonehenge is beautiful because it is part of the natural setting that recommended it to its builders. To enhance road speed and road use around this site is anachronistic at best and part of a drive...
Read more
-
I object to the tunnel plans as they will destroy vitaly important archaeology and will increase traffic on the 303
-
Need: I realise and deplore that big construction projects, conceived politically, are put forward without any publicly apparent process of evaluation, with the result that the Planning Inspectorate...
Read more