Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.
-
I wish to represent to the planning inspectorate my objections to key
aspects of the proposed A303 tunnel. In particular with regard to
tunnel length
negative impacts on exisiting key...
Read more
-
I am gravely concerned that the A303 project will have a damaging impact on Stonehenge sand the surrounding historical landscape. The Stonehenge site is unique and precious, not only a national...
Read more
-
I strongly disagree that the current proposal will not damage this unique landscape much of which still remains unexcavated. Once its gone or damaged it cannot be replaced. Its gone forever. Thousands...
Read more
-
The proposed new road will damage the important archaeological heritage of this country and alter the unique landscape and wildlife of the area.
-
This is a precious, unique landscape which will sustain damage of the most serious nature if these plans are carried out. It is a World heritage Site, which means it is the most precious to us, the...
Read more
-
My points are as follows:
1, Irreparable damage to the WHS, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’.
2, UNESCO’s international advisers say the scheme...
Read more
-
The site is unique. It is not just a matter of some stones that have been put up, probably to worship and therefore deserving our respect. The surrounding scenery and atmosphere are an intrinsic part...
Read more
-
I feel it is important not to implement any change in the A303 in the vicinity of Stonehenge. Certainly not flyovers or underpasses both will have substantial impact on this ancient world heritage...
Read more
-
This site is irreplaceable and unique in the world. Irreparable damage could so easily be done to parts of it that we may not even know about yet if the work goes ahead as planned. Other routes should...
Read more
-
The proposed works will be damaging to a site of huge international historical importance.
-
This site has impotance/significance to the entire world. The damage done by this project is harmful to the interests of the entire world. Not enough has been done to get the input of everyone...
Read more
-
I am objecting to the plans to change the road next to Stonehenge for the following reasons:
1) Lack of consideration of alternatives
2) Potential damage to Stonehenge due to additional speed and...
Read more
-
As Lord Kennet, I am privileged to be a long standing supporter of the Stonehenge Alliance, it´s positions and it´s policies regarding the Stonehenge and Avebury World Heritage Site.
My family are...
Read more
-
I am deeply concerned about the plans for Stonehenge and its surroundings, which seem to me to be a wanton act of vandalism.
This is quite possibly the most important archaeological site not just...
Read more
-
This is. Sacrilege.undermining an ainchient monument.not in my name.
-
I am very concerned that the people currently doing works at Stonehenge seem to be incompetent. There should not be any engineering near/in a Word heritage Site anyway. No generation has the right to...
Read more
-
My primary objection is about the Irreparable damage to the whole World Heritage Site both the archeology as well as setting - UNESCO are against this road scheme in its current form. My second key...
Read more
-
I was able to visit Stonehenge in the the late 1960s when the site was relatively untouched. It saddens me that this wonderful experience can never be shared again. Stonehenge is more than just the...
Read more
-
There will be irreparable damage to the WHS, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’
UNESCO’s international advisers say the scheme should not go ahead in...
Read more
-
I feel that this endeavour will seriously damage what is an absolute national treasure, and a site of global importance and interest. The planners must look to other alternative solutions to the...
Read more
-
Irreparable damage to the WHS, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’.
UNESCO’s international advisers say the scheme should not go ahead in its present...
Read more
-
Concern about the damage and destruction of a world heritage site. A site of significant historical and cultural importance. A site that belongs tothe people of the UK and that i feel that there has...
Read more
-
I am concerned about the damage the proposed road scheme will do to a world heritage site (WHS). UNESCO has described it as a landscape without parallel and it's advisers say the scheme should not go...
Read more
-
Stonehenge is an extremely important part of our English heritage. I believe, as does UNESCO, that this scheme would cause irreparable damage to an irreplaceable site. I also feel that other schemes...
Read more
-
Very concerned that Stonehenge and surrounds are in danger, and am unclear what steps are being taken to protect this international treasure.
-
This is an ancient site that has been there for thousands of years. Therefore it is a site of historical importance. I feel from the past examples of your workforce's carelessness, they not only under...
Read more
-
I object because i believe salsbury plain is a national treasure which should be protected for future generations.
-
This is an area of unparalleled historic and archaeological significance for the UK as well as being meaningful on a global level. Discoveries are constantly being made and we now understand the site...
Read more
-
I have been very interested in, and very highly value, all sites with ancient human value for most of my life, man and boy (I'm in my fifties). The Stonehenge Landscape is supreme among these, and...
Read more
-
I believe that only a deep long tunnel will preserve the underground natural structures surrounding the site; the risk of excessive artificial drainage, the fracturing of shallower strata will...
Read more
-
I object to this scheme because I believe that it will cause great and lasting damage to one of the most valued archaeological sites in the world. The scheme is sacrilege in every sense of the word.
-
The whole area for many miles around Stonehenge contains historic evidence going back 5,000 years. It has been disturbed too much already during the last 100 years. No further major construction...
Read more
-
As a world heritage site I am concerned about irreversible damage to it and it's setting from the current scheme. Unesco advisers state this scheme should not go ahead and I support their view. I am...
Read more
-
This is an incredibly important site. We have to take the utmost care of it. There is no second change to get this right.
-
The Stonehenge WHS is of international significance and extends out into the landscape, not just the main Henge. A tunnel under this landscape will destroy undiscovered archeology. It will cause light...
Read more
-
Once this cultural resource is gone, it's lost forever. The scheme will cause irreparable damage to the WHS, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’
...
Read more
-
I am very concerned about the damage that will be done to a WHS, both to the landscape and archaeology. The landscape is as important as the monument.
UNESCO’s international advisers recommend that...
Read more
-
Most UK archaeology societies and specialist archaeologists, together with UNESCO and its international advisers, say the scheme should not go ahead in its present form as it threatens the wider...
Read more
-
I oppose the proposed planning proposals as they will cause irreparable damage to the world heritage site and need to be re thought.
-
The road would
• destroy unique ancient heritage
• it threatens rare bird habitats, in particular those of the great bustard and stone curlew
• contribute to climate change by generating more...
Read more
-
I am most concerned at the potential and irreparable damage to the archaeology and setting of the UNESCO and WHS, its setting, in accordance with UNESCO advice. My concern also extends to the Blick...
Read more
-
That alternative solutions have not been presented.
That irreparable damage will be done to the WHS.
That the construction method of the proposed tunnel will destroy part of the WHS.
That the...
Read more
-
To desecrate the land surrounding Stonehenge and to isolate, more than it already is, Stonehenge itself, to take away its power and loneliness as it was set in the landscape, is to ignore its...
Read more
-
The current proposal will cause irreparable harm to ancient and invaluable archaeological sites, as well as damaging the environment of a World Heritage site.
Too many national and international...
Read more
-
I do believe the tunnel and subsequent road works should take place at Stonehenge. Should the new road scheme be really required it needs to be built away from the Stonehenge area and complex and...
Read more
-
The proposed expressway will attract even faster, noisier traffic than at present, and inflict irreversible damage on a unique, internationally significant landscape.
-
I object to this due to the damage already caused to a site of Historic Importance. Not only has damage been caused to Blick Mead Mesolithic site, but even UNESCO's advisors disagree with this plan. I...
Read more
-
The proposed scheme has been judged by many experts, including UNESCO and local parties such as the Wiltshire Museum in Devizes, to be extremely damaging to a wide area of archaeological and wildlife...
Read more
-
Please learn from the irreparable damage caused to other very important and unique sites of the world by irreverent and destructive roadbuilding. This particular roadbuilding scheme is wrong on so...
Read more
-
The archaeology lost by this planning can never to regained. I object strongly to any tunnel. I travel along the A303 regularly and there are often bigger hold ups beyond Stonehedge towards Mere, so...
Read more