Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.
-
CO2 emissions need to be cut immediately. Expansion is counter to all scientific advice on reaching net zero. Millions are already suffering the devastating effects of climate change. Their lives are...
Read more
-
I support this application. I lived in Crawley since 1956 to 1999. The Airport is a very important part of Crawley, and surrounding area, for it's economy, infrastructure, and the people of the area...
Read more
-
I am a taxi driver and this project will bring more work for this industry and will be beneficial for me and my family
-
I support this as Crawley needs significant investment
-
The main issue is pollution and climate change caused by air traffic
-
I object to the project on the following grounds because I believe it to be a new runway: 1. I am greatly concerned that the increased level of air traffic will have a detrimental impact on the level...
Read more
-
While we face a climate emergency, any expansion in air travel cannot be considered necessary.
-
This submission has been prepared based in part on the response of others including Gatwick Area Conservation Campaign (GACC) and New Economics Foundation and in part on my own professional expertise...
Read more
-
The proposed project will create additional aircraft noise in the surrounding area. Expansion of the airport will also put pressure on transport facilities in the area. It will also have an adverse...
Read more
-
Nothing has changed since Gatwick was turned down in favour of Heathrow expansion by the Airport Commission in 2015. Gatwick sits on a single arterial road (M23) and a single railway line that can’t...
Read more
-
I object most strenuously against the expansion of Gatwick, including the construction of a second runway. The most significant issues are the increasing local and global pollution, especially...
Read more
-
My principal objection is on the grounds of carbon emissions. I do not believe the economic argument is well-supported for expansion, but I also think the economic aspects are marginal relative to the...
Read more
-
Living below the flight path means that the noise intrusion will increase above what I would consider to be already high levels - but surely cutting down on the fossil fuel usage alone should push the...
Read more
-
Gatwick Airport needs to expand. The lack of infrastructure invested in airports since the war is a disgrace
-
I am opposed to the second runway at Gatwick due to the increased noise pollution and other major environmental factors.
-
The approval of this plan is a no-brainier - if we want our country to be competitive we need to have good links with the rest of the world - expansion of Gatwick’s capacity is essential to ensure...
Read more
-
Decline the expansion request - it is not warranted and the current flight activity is already a nuisance
-
The main issues are increased noise and environmental damage to local residents. A lack of demand in shoulder periods of the day means Gatwick is not full, they only want to be able to sell expensive...
Read more
-
I’m against the proposal. Local infrastructure and roads do not have capacity for more traffic. The countryside around the western and southwestern side has no major roads to carry extra traffic. The...
Read more
-
It’s good for people living and working around
-
Introduction The Surrey Climate Commission is an independent body with the role of supporting and guiding the transition of Surrey to a carbon neutral future. This document accompanies the...
Read more
-
Writing as Chair of a Surrey-wide organisation that supports many voluntary partners across the county, I know that a lot of those are working with people who are either employed directly by Gatwick...
Read more
-
I strongly object to the proposed new runway at Gatwick airport. 1. Aircraft noise from the existing runway has noticeably worsened over the past few years and blights the lives of those who live...
Read more
-
As we are situated so near to Gatwick Airport we are already on blighted land, so proposal of extending the emergency runway is just an added nightmare. The ‘over flights’ we suffer from when landings...
Read more
-
I am against the expansion of Gatwick airport because we already suffer a great deal from aircraft noise in the local area, including frequent flights directly over our house. I am also concerned...
Read more
-
The already increasing fumes and noise will get even worse and make using outside spaces impossible for any form of socialisation as the noise from the planes forces you to stop talking as its too...
Read more
-
I do not believe this is the right decision for our area. I oppose this Gatwick northern runway application. Inunderstand that it will help jobs and Gatwick to grow. However, the infrastructure of the...
Read more
-
It is good for the economy
-
I am hugely concerned about the increase in carbon and noise pollution that this would cause. My area is already above WHO recommended levels of air toxicity and I’m especially worried for vulnerable...
Read more
-
Noise and polution
-
I think this will be good for the local and wider economy. It will also reduce the current delays experienced during peak periods
-
1. Gatwick claims that that many thousands of new jobs will be created and presents this as an advantage. On the contrary, it will impact negatively. There is already a severe shortage of housing in...
Read more
-
Flight Path and Flight Times
-
We lie under the landing flight path for the prevailing westerly wind conditions. During summer weekends flights start at 0630 and continue at up to every 2-3 minute intervals through til late. We...
Read more
-
I object to this for environmental reasons and the noise impact it will have on my home.
-
Great idea
-
I live in Redhill. I don't see why this is required.
-
I support the use of the emergency runway being used as a second full time runway.
-
I think is a good idea as it will generate business for the town
-
I am concerned about flight paths and noise. A second runway will increase the number of aircraft forcing new flight paths over the countryside and communities who already have to deal with flights...
Read more
-
I live in (Redacted) which is a rural location in an area of outstanding natural beauty. My home is impacted by flights arriving and departing from Gatwick airport. In the operation of Gatwick airport...
Read more
-
I’m ok with Gatwick new plans for growing the number of flights and be able to use the second runaway.
-
This is a terrible idea. The environmental impact of further air travel is terrible. The impact on the local area, the carbon footprint of all the concrete. This is terrible.
-
The proposal would have a huge impact on local air quality, local noise pollution, residential amenity and the environment generally. I also don’t think it would deliver the anticipated economic...
Read more
-
Safety its an emergency runway
-
My main concerns with this proposal are: 1) increased noise levels in the local area due to increased air traffic; 2) increased air traffic will increase carbon emissions when we are in a climate...
Read more
-
We would like to object to the proposal to develop a second runway operation at Gatwick Airport for the following reasons: Expansion of aviation would contradict policies to reduce carbon emissions....
Read more
-
There is a near continuous drone / noise pollution from the airport, this goes on to the early hours well after last flight affecting local residents and sleep, it can be difficult to be outside in my...
Read more
-
We must all get behind and support a growing industry.
-
This second runway should not have permission to go ahead as it completely contradicts the net zero targets, causes pollution, noise and increases traffic on the roads.