Filter

Hinckley National Rail Freight Interchange

Relevant representations (registration comments)

Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.

Showing 226 to 250 of 1424 representations, newest first.

Results per page 25 | View 50 results per page | View 100 results per page

  • Kirsteen Thomson

    There will be an overflow of traffic that uses the site which will impact the wider area. I would be more likely to support the site if good and services came and went by rail however I understand... Read more

  • Malcolm Bradbury

    There is insufficient infrastructure in and around Stoney Stanton and Elmsthorpe to support this development. We already have too many HGVs negotiating the village roads thanks to the Calor Gas depot.... Read more

  • Marc Slack

    I object due to: - Increased traffic through the villages increasing pollution and road traffic accidents Removal of existing natural landscape Increased noise levels Concern of local flooding due to... Read more

  • Monique Soutart

    Too much damage to the environment, local villages, peoples lives, wildlife - for something that is not needed as there are several other RFIs close to Hinckley and it has not been made clear why... Read more

  • Lisa Nikolic on behalf of Nikolic (Nikolic)

    We live just off Normandy Way in Hinckley. already we have severe hold ups along this road because of the industrial estate, the established housing estates and now we have a vast Bloor Homes estate... Read more

  • Richard John Nikolic

    I wish to register to give my thoughts on the effects the planning application will have on my wellbeing

  • Ruth Aizlewood

    This is a poorly thought out proposal. The traffic implications alone are going to be problematic and every 'mitigation' i have seen put forward by Tritax thus far is unworkable. From the initial "all... Read more

  • Stephen Pears

    I object to this development. There is a Green Wedge that provides extensive views that are valued by the people of Barwell, these views will be spoilt by the planned buildings. The planned traffic... Read more

  • Alison Williams

    Increase in traffic on roads & increased pollution is not acceptable. Hinckley is gridlocked at times already, with artics being Sent down roads that are narrow & not built for such heavy traffic.... Read more

  • Earl Shilton Town Council (Earl Shilton Town Council)

    Dear Sir/Madam, Ref: Your letter 40/EL01LEX_S42 dated 07 Jan 22. 1. Thank you for your recent letter referenced above. 2. The Full Council of Earl Shilton Town Council (ESTC) met on 10 Jan 22 and... Read more

  • ian swirles

    The People in this area do not require this development and it has not been requested by us. That should end any more discussion. The area is already out of balance because too many houses have been... Read more

  • Paul Shurmer

    Amount of traffic in and around the village of stoney stanton Impact on the environment around the village and wider Danger to children in stoney stanton due to the above. The maintenance of roads... Read more

  • Sharon Scott

    • No market need due to close proximity of other SRFIs in the area (including Daventry International Rail Freight Terminal (DIRFT) and East Midlands Gateway (part of the new Freeport complex)). •... Read more

  • Carl Fox

    Within a 50 mile radius of the proposed site there are a number of rail freight interchange developments, all of which are currently very much under utilised. The proposed site is surplus to... Read more

  • Mark Ludbrook

    I believe that the proposed project will have a detrimental effect on Burbage common due to the light and noise pollution caused by the additional trains and site operations. The buildings will also... Read more

  • Patricia Ann Gregory

    The Hinckley Rail Freight Interchange is totally in the wrong place. We already have a Rail Freight Terminal a short distance away along the A5 in Rugby which is still operating under capacity 20... Read more

  • stuart michael stripp

    I live possibly the closest to the proposed development and are concerned about the impact it will have on our future living environment with regard to visual, noise,traffic and light pollution that... Read more

  • Terence Lowe

    I am very concerned over what this planned development will do to an established rural area

  • Barbara Lees

    1.Would set a precedent siting a rail freight terminal and warehouses on a site described as 'Aston Flamville wooded farmland' ( Blaby District landscape and settlement character assessment 2020)... Read more

  • Catherine Cole

    The local infrastructure is completely unable to support a new rail freight interchange – this is both in terms of the capability of the railway line and also the local roads. In addition, the huge... Read more

  • Dominic Steel

    Hello and for starters It’s “an extra16+” trains a day not just “16 trains” which I’ve just read is actually 32! So that’s an EXTRA 32 trains. Secondly the road network surrounding this huge site... Read more

  • Nicholas Moore

    I am appalled by these plans and object strongly. In particular I object the removal of Burbage Common Road and several miles of public rights of way, without any provision for equivalent routing... Read more

  • Patricia Margaret Parkin-Moore

    I am worried about the huge increase of traffic through local villages and the environment, specially Burbage Woods

  • Peter Adams

    I understand that there will be an access road from the development onto the A47 joining at either the Barwell or Earl Shilton roundabouts. The road off the Common roundabout into Hinckley (Leicester... Read more

  • roger toovey

    How will staff get to work?? T here is no bus or rail service, if they have to drive ,where will they park?