Skip to main content
Find a National Infrastructure Project

Beta This is a beta service - your feedback will help us to improve it

Filter
Hinckley National Rail Freight Interchange

Relevant representations (registration comments)

Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.

Showing 1201 to 1225 of 1424 representations, newest first.

Results per page 25 | View 50 results per page | View 100 results per page

  • Lisa Nikolic on behalf of Nikolic (Nikolic)

    We live just off Normandy Way in Hinckley. already we have severe hold ups along this road because of the industrial estate, the established housing estates and now we have a vast Bloor Homes estate... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 May 2023

  • Richard John Nikolic

    I wish to register to give my thoughts on the effects the planning application will have on my wellbeing

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 May 2023

  • Ruth Aizlewood

    This is a poorly thought out proposal. The traffic implications alone are going to be problematic and every 'mitigation' i have seen put forward by Tritax thus far is unworkable. From the initial "all... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 May 2023

  • Stephen Pears

    I object to this development. There is a Green Wedge that provides extensive views that are valued by the people of Barwell, these views will be spoilt by the planned buildings. The planned traffic... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 May 2023

  • Colin Blackford

    Why build on green belt land, our countryside when there is a rail freight terminal only 15 miles away in Crick with infrastructure already there. Just expand this area as it is close to the M1, M6,... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 21 May 2023

  • David John Verrall

    During the informal consultations, residents and Triax Symmetry themselves raised concerns over increased pollution from road vehicles and diesel trains using the rail freight interchange site, and... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 21 May 2023

  • Jessica Janine Verso

    Concerned about the impact it will have on local rail service and other services/transport. Also concerned about the impact on noise pollution levels and environmental issues.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 21 May 2023

  • Rachel Aldred

    I am against this proposed project because a) it's going to be right next door to 400 acres of common land used by many locals daily and is supposed to be a peaceful, relaxing place to be to help... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 21 May 2023

  • Richard Osborn

    As a resident of Littlethorpe, we are concerned by the increased train movements and impact on the Narborough Level Crossing which already causes significant traffic problems at peak times. So far as... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 21 May 2023

  • David lester

    To site an industrial giant like this in unspoilt outstanding countryside is a TRAVESTY The whole western side of Leicester has been overdeveloped with no improvement to roads or infrastructure for... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 20 May 2023

  • David Wood

    Having attended the presentation at Narborough Village Hall, I was not impressed by the knowledge of those making the presentation. Of most concern was the person who dismissed all arguments that the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 20 May 2023

  • Mrs Susan Jenkins

    The lack of information provided at local level by Tritax Symmetry when showing local residences the plans for this work. The traffic that will increase 10 fold through Sapcote Village during building... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 20 May 2023

  • Adam Cookes

    Dear Members of the Examining Authority, I hope this letter finds you well. I am writing to express my deep concern and objection regarding the proposed construction of the Hinckley National Rail... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 19 May 2023

  • Brian Roy Screaton

    This is an opportunistic application for a development which is entirely unnecessary and will result in more green fields being concreted over.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 19 May 2023

  • Carlton Parish Council (Carlton Parish Council)

    Carlton Parish Council objects to this proposal on the grounds that a) the interchange is not necessary as there are already large SRFIs capable of expansion at East Midlands Airport, DIRFT near... Read more

    Submitted by: Parish councils
    Date submitted: 19 May 2023

  • Colin Dawson

    Impact of the number of trains effecting Narborough Station and access from Narborough to Littlethorpe. The effect of the vibration from large freight trains to properties causing structural damage to... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 19 May 2023

  • David John Frost

    I have concerns about our lovely conservation area of Burbage Common and its wildlife. The level crossing barrier at Narborough Station will create further problems holding up the considerable amount... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 19 May 2023

  • David Sewell

    I have a number of concerns about the Hinckley National Rail Freight Interchange. I live in Sharnford, a small village near the site, which already has significant traffic problems. These have been... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 19 May 2023

  • LESLEY READING

    I have lived in the Hinckley/Narborough area all of my life. Burbage Common is the only 'large'green space in the the local area for dog walking, walking , running, horse riding, taking the the family... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 19 May 2023

  • Maurice Chappell

    My concerns are the future development of Stoney Stanton and surrounding districts and the impact that they may on the local areas

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 19 May 2023

  • Pamela Wood

    I live adjacent to the perimeter road as you will note from the address. The extra 200 (could be plus) lorries/vehicles would cause so much extra pollution and noise to this neighbourhood. There is... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 19 May 2023

  • Robert Howard

    The development is unneccesary and will have hugely damaging effect on local communities and the enviroment.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 19 May 2023

  • Sheila Elizabeth Ferriman

    I strongly object to the Tritax Symmetry project to build a Rail Freight Interchange at Hinckley. I wrote to the Secretary of State Department (Transport) March 14th 2022 expressing my deep concerns... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 19 May 2023

  • Wendy Martin

    I lead a Walking for Health group from Burbage Common. Many of the paths and roads we use will be adversely affected by lorry transport, making them unsafe. We regularly use 2 railway crossings, which... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 19 May 2023

  • Amy Blackford

    With there being a freight distribution site already nearby in Crick / Rugby , in a much more industrial location, there is no need to bring the onslaught of traffic and pollution into already overly... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 May 2023