Skip to main content
Find a National Infrastructure Project

Beta This is a beta service - your feedback will help us to improve it

Filter
Cambridge Waste Water Treatment Plant Relocation

Relevant representations (registration comments)

Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.

Showing 126 to 150 of 309 representations, newest first.

Results per page 25 | View 50 results per page | View 100 results per page

  • Julia Hochbach

    The proposed relocation of the perfectly functional sewage works from Milton appears to have no good reason other than to develop the site of the existing sewage works for profit. The carbon footprint... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 July 2023

  • Julia Smitherman

    I oppose Anglian Water’s application to develop a new sewage treatment plant on the site of Honey Hill, Cambridge, and plan to decommission the current plant at Milton for no operational reason other... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 July 2023

  • Lily Morris

    My objections to CWWTPR are as follows: Dealing with climate change has to be above everything and doing everything we can to minimise it must be our priority. They say the sewage plant needs to move... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 July 2023

  • Mark Davis

    I object to the proposal.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 July 2023

  • Quod (Quod) on behalf of Marshall Group Properties (Marshall Group Properties)

    1 Introduction 1.1 These relevant representations have been prepared on behalf of Marshall Group Properties (MGP) following the recent submission of Anglian Water’s Cambridge Waste Water Treatment... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 July 2023
    Contains attachment(s)

  • Mary Kay Muhr

    I grew up on High Ditch Road, Fen Ditton, [Redacted], and am still part-owner of a house there. We were proud to live on, and be able to walk along, the course of a Dyke, with open Green Belt land to... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 July 2023

  • Monica Bijok

    Cambridge is already unsustainable in water. The River Cam is dying. It is no longer spring fed, but mostly recycled water. As a rare chalk stream it should be crystal clear and a constant 10°C. It is... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 July 2023

  • Mr Colin Davidson

    It's appropriate to move the sewage works from their current location south of the A14 on the edge of Cambridge, but this should be dependent on the quality of the proposal for what to replace it... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 July 2023

  • Rebecca Foreman

    I object to the relocation of the sewage works on a number of points: primarily there is no real need to move the plant, the current site has been upgraded recently to ensure that it is ‘future proof’... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 July 2023

  • Richard Holton

    I live in Horningsea, and am very concerned about this project. I am concerned at the enormous environmental cost of building it; at the disruption caused by the building; and by the disruption to the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 July 2023

  • Rosalind Jane Aveling

    I understand development pressures and the need for compromise. But the risk now of environmental damage in a changing climate is so high, and escalating, that it should be the first consideration in... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 July 2023

  • Ruth Davis

    There is no need to move the Cambridge waste water treatment plant from its current location. It is fully functioning and was future-proofed just 8 years ago at great expense. Any future upgrades... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 July 2023

  • Sarah Farrell

    Moving the sewage works will generate lots of traffic both during construction and on an ongoing basis. This is already a busy road not fit to accept heavier traffic, which is unsafe to residents,... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 July 2023

  • Steven Green

    I am very concerned about the proposal to relocate the waste treatment plant from Milton to Fen Ditton, Horningsea and Quy. It appears the a huge amount of public money, hundreds of millions, is being... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 July 2023

  • Stuart Gibbs

    I strongly object to the relocation of Anglian Water sewage works from Cowley Road , Cambridge to Honey Hill , Fen Ditton on the following grounds: impact on the conservation areas of Fen Ditton and... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 July 2023

  • Susan Griffin

    Unnecessary upheaval and impact on all nearby residents and wildlife. Increase in heavy traffic. Huge financial cost Carbon cost to the environment and loss of green belt. Questions about length of... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 July 2023

  • Susan Roberts

    • I object very strongly to the plan to move the CWWTP to Honey Hill. Fundamentally, I see no convincing reason for the move. The current works on Cowley Road are fully functioning, have capacity and... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 July 2023

  • Susan Valerie Buttery

    I am registering my concerns about the relocation of the sewage treatment plant from Milton to the Honey Hill site.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 July 2023

  • Teresa Ross

    I’m concerned about the wildlife, with all the building works in our area we are losing all our green spaces, The smell is another thing, sometimes we can smell the sewer from Milton, I really don’t... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 July 2023

  • Design&Conservation (Design&Conservation) on behalf of the Yandell family. (the Yandell family.)

    We are opposed to the relocation in principle but on the basis that it may obtain consent we object to the plant's unnecessary size , the ill-considered intrusiveness of the design, its... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 July 2023

  • Alice Bettoney

    There is an extremely high environmental cost associated with rebuilding of the sewage works, to only move it a relatively small distance away from the existing site. The current site could be brought... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 16 July 2023

  • Benjamin John Morris

    I am objecting to the proposed relocation of Cambridge’s Water Treatment Plant for the following reasons: I don’t feel enough was done to look at the benefits of keeping the sewage plant where it is... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 16 July 2023

  • Catherine Rosemary Grant

    I object to the proposal For a) the unnecessary relocation of an existing sewage treatment plant with adequate capacity for the foreseeable future to a site in the green belt with the consequent... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 16 July 2023

  • Emily Green

    Dear Examining Authority, I am writing to stringently oppose the plans to move a fully-functioning sewage work. As you are aware, the current sewage work was made to last till at least 2050, and yet... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 16 July 2023

  • Evelyn Edith Daniel

    I object most strongly to the proposal to move the Waste Water Treatment Plant from its present site to Honey Hill, Fen Ditton. I believe this to be totally unnecessary and a complete waste of money.... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 16 July 2023