Skip to main content
Find a National Infrastructure Project

Beta This is a beta service - your feedback will help us to improve it

Filter
Cambridge Waste Water Treatment Plant Relocation

Relevant representations (registration comments)

Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.

Showing 201 to 225 of 309 representations, newest first.

Results per page 25 | View 50 results per page | View 100 results per page

  • A Chapman

    I am writing to make clear my objection to the proposed creation of a new Sewage Works at the Honey Hill beauty spot between Horningsea and Fen Ditton. A sewage works should not be built at Honey Hill... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 10 July 2023

  • Amanda Bohun

    I object to unnecessary destruction of areas of outstanding natural beauty or green belt due to the serious impact this has, not only on the plant, insect and wildlife habitat in that area but... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 10 July 2023

  • Catherine Helen Martin

    1) Inappropriate development on Green Belt – the Proposed Development (PD) would cause permanent harm to the Cambridge Green Belt. The Green Belt here has an important role: it preserves the openness... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 10 July 2023

  • Friends of Horningsea Church (Friends of Horningsea Church)

    I am writing as Chairman of the Friends of Horningsea Church, a body concerned with the upkeep of the fabric of the church, accessibility to the church and management of the churchyard 1. There has... Read more

    Submitted by: Non-statutory organisations
    Date submitted: 10 July 2023

  • Geoffrey Alan Forster

    a) I think that the proposal to build a new sewage works on Honey Hill so close to the centre of Cambridge is very short sighted. b) I am very much against building the sewage works on top of a major... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 10 July 2023

  • Janet Ann Wright

    I strongly object to the sewage works relocation in Fen Ditton for the following reasons: 1) I recently moved to this area and I chose it because it is close to the conservation area of Fen Ditton,... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 10 July 2023

  • Nasar Aboukhshem

    We are very concerned about the impact of the development on but not limited to the following: Increased traffic: Our house is the first house in the village. There is already considerable traffic... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 10 July 2023

  • Rosie Cox

    I would like to object to the relocation of the sewage works on a number of grounds. Largely these are environmental and at heart my objection is that, in relocating the sewage works to Honey Hill,... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 10 July 2023

  • BNP Paribas Real Estate (BNP Paribas Real Estate) on behalf of Royal Mail (Royal Mail)

    Royal Mail (RM) does not have an in principle objection to Cambridge Waste Water Treatment Plant but is seeking to secure mitigations to protect its operations during the construction phase. Under... Read more

    Submitted by: Other statutory consultees
    Date submitted: 10 July 2023

  • Veronica Jayne Saunders

    My comments are on the relocation of the Cambridge Waste Water Treatment Plant to Honey Hill. Please consider these initial comments. I would like to make further comments during the process. Green... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 10 July 2023

  • Abbey Greens Ward Office (Abbey Greens Ward Office)

    I am concerned about the impact of site traffic on a busy junction. Honey Hill is the site of an attractive circular walk and is the gateway to the Wicken Fen nature reserve, so there is a loss of... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 9 July 2023

  • Alan Hugh Muhr

    I object to the relocation of Cambridge Waste Water Works from Milton to Honey Hill for the following reasons: - the Green Belt status of Honey Hill should be respected. I am very familiar with the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 9 July 2023

  • Friends of the Cam (Friends of the Cam)

    Friends of the Cam's primary grounds for objection to moving the Waste Water Treatment Plan from its current site in NE Cambridge to Honey Hill: 1.Demolition and new construction are heavy carbon... Read more

    Submitted by: Non-statutory organisations
    Date submitted: 9 July 2023

  • Harriet Wykeham

    The existing plant is fully functional and has been future-proofed. I therefore don't think it's acceptable to build on Green Belt land, and incur both the monetary and carbon cost of that.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 9 July 2023

  • Janet Walker

    My objections Inter alia - Impact on the Green Belt, which is contrary to national and local planning policies - likely impact on and important rare chalk aquifer; - Impact on public rights of way,... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 9 July 2023

  • Jean Williams

    I wish to object to the relocation of the sewage works on the following grounds: It is contrary to several City Council policies, including their declared biodiversity and climate change emergencies.... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 9 July 2023

  • nicola marshall

    It should not be relocated to honey hill for environmental reasons and should remain in its current position.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 9 July 2023

  • Rhian Benstead

    Why are we using £227 million of taxpayers’ money to fund the completely unnecessary move of a perfectly functionable sewage works from its current location to a green belt area, which is contrary to... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 9 July 2023

  • Schia Sinclair

    I don’t think that the sewage works should be relocated at all, to anywhere, and definitely not to an area of green belt. My specific issues are as follows: 1. Building on green belt. 2. The carbon... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 9 July 2023

  • John Sandey

    My objection to the relocation of the sewage works to Honey Hill I have decided to lodge an objection to the construction of a sewage works at Honey Hill. I have set out below the main reasons which... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 7 July 2023

  • Lynn Arnold

    I am very concerned about the building of new sewage outlet for these reasons: The negative impact on conservation area if Fen Ditton and the effect it will have on wildlife and diversity. Building on... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 7 July 2023

  • Rebecca Hollweg

    It is unnecessary, wasteful, unecological and will ruin an area of natural beauty, upsetting many local residents.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 7 July 2023

  • Barbara Le Gallez

    I am opposed to the proposed project, for the following reasons: 1) There is no operational need for it. 2) It will damage the Green Belt, including farmland and recreational areas. 3) It will... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 6 July 2023

  • Christine Turnbull

    I am wholly opposed to this project particularly as it is so close to a very important aquafer. It is using up valuable GREEN BELT productive agricultural land - still being farmed. It is almost next... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 6 July 2023

  • Fiona Bryant

    Comments in relation to economic, social and environmental impact

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 6 July 2023