Skip to main content
Find a National Infrastructure Project

Beta This is a beta service - your feedback will help us to improve it

Filter
Mallard Pass Solar Project

Relevant representations (registration comments)

Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.

Showing 901 to 925 of 1222 representations, newest first.

Results per page 25 | View 50 results per page | View 100 results per page

  • Mrs Patricia Ann Leaper

    * There will be continuous noise, pollution, disruption, and damage to property and surrounding area. * It will increase the impact of heavy HGV lorries and project associated workforce and vehicles... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 3 February 2023

  • Mrs Vanessa Kimberley

    The profits of the proposed site will not , in my view, benefit the UK as the company who own Mallard Pass is not a UK one. The proposed site is larger than Westminster, imagine looking out the office... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 3 February 2023

  • Pamela Russon

    This proposal is far too large . It would be using farmland/ green fields , that should be used for agricultural purposes . The effect on wildlife would be devastating. Solar panels should be on roofs... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 3 February 2023

  • Philip Leaper

    * The vehicles entering and exiting the A6121, from the industrial areas, are already large, heavy, dangerous and unsuitable for the infrastructure of Essendine. *The further impact of weighty... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 3 February 2023

  • Richard James Granville White

    My main concerns about the Mallard Solar Plant Proposal are: Increased Flood Risk for properties in the flood prone village of Greatford and the local area. Misuse of vast area of good quality... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 3 February 2023

  • Sandra Jane Collins

    I live in what will be the centre of this proposed solar farm. The disruption to my everyday life will be immense. The roads in this area are rural lanes and are not able to cope with the volume of... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 3 February 2023

  • William Adkin

    This vast project (2000+) acres will be a dominant feature of the surrounding area. it will be built, in part, on what is good agricultural land which in the long term interests of the country as a... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 3 February 2023

  • A Mitchell

    In no order at this point: Sheer Scale Land use….AGRICULTURE not solar Visual impact combined with Mental Health transferring to physical health of the people affected by this. Ecology and Wildlife... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 2 February 2023

  • Alexandra Ellis

    I am concerned about the use of agricultural land when there are numerous alternatives eg roof slopes of large industrial buildings. The prospect of compulsory acquisitions in Essendine is not... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 2 February 2023

  • Benjamin Tony Evans

    I oppose the mallard pass solar farm because of the sheer size of the development in the chosen location. It will be a great loss of beautiful countryside, there are far more suitable areas for this... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 2 February 2023

  • Darren Gray

    This will have a significant impact on the future use of high grade arable and grazing land, by removing it from use. Also, the resultant impact on wildlife is very much a concern. Other than during... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 2 February 2023

  • David John Gladstone Wilby

    To big, too many disadvantages would ensue for a small rural community

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 2 February 2023

  • Eric Tindall

    COVERING OUR AGRICULTURAL LAND WITH SOLAR PANELS IS A MISTAKE WHEN SO MANY INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS ACROSS THE UNITED KINGDOM HAVE VACANT ROOF SPACE THAT WOULD EASILY BE FITTED WITH SOLAR PANELS TO DO THE... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 2 February 2023

  • Helena Swallow

    As a local resident I believe this land should remain as farming land. This project is planned with short term benefits in mind. We will need our agricultural land into the coming years - population... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 2 February 2023

  • Joan Bavister

    Farmers allowing the use of good agricultural land have become turncoats and taken the Kings shilling. We are surrounded by notices keep out, get off my land, private. They despise the public, yet... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 2 February 2023

  • Joanna Winterbourne

    This solar farm is going to decimate the countryside around stamford and impact all the villages to the north east of the time. The Secretary of State has just announced the need for access to the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 2 February 2023

  • Julie Beecham

    Extra traffic and restrictions on dog walking. Excess noise and disturbance to wildlife impacting on mental health.Compulsory aquirement of my land which I previously knew nothing about.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 2 February 2023

  • Madeline Davies

    We live in a beautiful productive area and can not understand why good quality farmland will be taken out of production when as a country we need more self sufficiency. To spend the rest of my life... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 2 February 2023

  • Malcolm Osborne

    [redacted] are a Chinese Company, the panels would be assembled in China. DONOT support PRChina by awarding this contract. Great Britain should be utilising Business and Companies from friendly... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 2 February 2023

  • Marian Busby

    This project will not only visually ruin a beautiful area of open land, it will remove the habitat of the local wildlife. I am also concerned that the already damaged local roads are not up to the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 2 February 2023

  • Martyn Mason Bradshaw

    too large on very good farm land.too near villages .the building will bad extra heavy traffic. bad to excise my horse not a inefficient as a source of energy.who will clear up at the end

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 2 February 2023

  • Mary Ludlow

    . Loss of valuable farming land . Disruption to area by heavy traffic . The vista!

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 2 February 2023

  • Miss Ann Hughes

    The problem with this project is that it is far too big for a rural village location and solar farms should not be placed on good farm land that is needed to feed our growing nation. The government... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 2 February 2023

  • Muriel Ann Johnson

    Solar panels will be 3.3m high security fencing and CCTV, solar stations or shipping containers housing inverters/transformers dotted across the solar area. New sub-station will be visible & audible... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 2 February 2023

  • Philippa Ball

    Far too big a site. Solar panels should be on roofs not arable land.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 2 February 2023