Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.
-
As a Wiltshire resident and Briton I find this proposed tunnel an absolute abomination and a disgrace and oppose its construction absolutely. It has been proven by preliminary work on this site in the...
Read more
-
The proposal will damage the setting and archaeology of the Stonehenge site and surrounding area, as it goes too close to the monument on the surface, and the tunnel is not deep enough to miss...
Read more
-
I am concerned about tge effect this proposal will have on a World Heritage site and I don’t think that alternative routes have been sufficiently considered. I have been driven and driven my children...
Read more
-
I believe that the proposed changes to the A303 in the vicinity of the Stone Henge site will irreparably damage an ancient historic site that is of global importance and as such is registered as a...
Read more
-
I object to the building of the road around the Stonehenge heritage site. The disruption to the landscape and wildlife is unacceptable. I do not want to see this beautiful place disturbed or meddled...
Read more
-
Stonehenge is a World Heritage site. It is of immeasurable cultural and archaeological value.That is why a tunnel built within the designated area of this site ,which contains as yet unrecorded...
Read more
-
I object to the ancient site being distrubed. It is a world heritage site and a sacred site. It is lovely to see the stones when driving on the A303, why not make the A303 one way going West and...
Read more
-
Following the news last week of reckless archaeological damage I have little confidence that this work can be done without further damage to a site of unparalleled significance, as well as the unknown...
Read more
-
I have listened to the fears of people who are experts in Stonehenge and it's surrounds, and believe their opinions must be respected. This project is opposed so widely, both nationally and...
Read more
-
This proposal will cause unknown and irreparable damage to a globally important historic site. It ignores other ways of opening up travel between the west and London (I.e. Improved railways)....
Read more
-
There remain a considerable number of unknowns about Stonehenge, its value and purpose go I believe, well beyond it of being of tourist interest (however important that is deemed to be). It is a...
Read more
-
1 Concern about the visual impact of an east-west bridge or flyover at the Countess roundabout.
2 Concern about the likely increase in traffic noise from traffic on the A303 in the vicinity of a...
Read more
-
I am deeply upset that the only proposal for improvement of the Stonehenge area road system will pass so close to the monument and threatens the peaceful enjoyment of the site. I believe that another...
Read more
-
1) the destruction of archaeology not yet discovered;
2) the damage to the WHS and it’s landscape;
3) potential damage to Blick Mead, a Mesolithic site:
4) increase in traffic noise;
5) lack of...
Read more
-
The proposal will cause unneccessary damage to the Stonehenge archaeological landscape World Heritage site (as evidenced by damage to the Blick Down mesolithic site during advance investigations)....
Read more
-
Igt is not understood by the promoters of this project that the whole Stonehenge site must be considered as a whole, as within the layout of the land lies an enormous encyclopedia of...
Read more
-
At a time in our history of man-made environmental and societal crisis, confusion and destruction, Stonehenge is a powerful national institution representing human achievement and co-operation...
Read more
-
Stonehenge and its surrounding area is of immeasurable archaeological and cultural value. The protection and preservation of this World Heritage Site should be paramount. Building any highways in the...
Read more
-
I feel that there has not been given any other conclusion or different way other than the stated route, and think that the traffic volume will be disruptive and very bad, to the environment, birds,...
Read more
-
Irreparable damage to the WHS, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’
-
I feel that it this change to the site goes ahead we will lose a great heritage site,or the safety of it
It's considered as a holy site for us druids and friends of nature
I am disappointed that...
Read more
-
I feel that there should be more alternatives and I do not feel, as judging from the UNESCO comment, that you have explored this fully.
Why are we not more focused on the source of the problem? Why...
Read more
-
This is a world heritage site and the whole of the landscape within 5 miles of Stonehenge should be kept with minimal changes to preserve the site for future populations to enable the context and non...
Read more
-
its not a great idea
-
I am concerned by the following
That the construction of a tunnel past Stonehenge could spell the loss of a unique site that can trace the presence of people back to the last Ice Age
That the...
Read more