Filter

A303 Stonehenge

Relevant representations (registration comments)

Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.

Showing 626 to 650 of 2370 representations, newest first.

Results per page 25 | View 50 results per page | View 100 results per page

  • Zoe Day

    I am deeply concerned about the irrevocable harm which will result to this heritage site - a site which today merits further investigation if we are ever to truly understand its original purpose and... Read more

  • Adele Sharp

    I have grave concerns about the intended development of this World Heritage Site. There is a lot of untouched archaeology that risks being disturbed and irretrievably lost forever at this site. Year... Read more

  • Alexander Coombs

    As a UNESCO world heritage site and an iconic landmark of the UK any scheme that is anything but perfect is not acceptable and every effort should be made to protect such a site from rash planning... Read more

  • Amelia

    Totally irreparable damage to the WHS, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’. UNESCO’s international advisers state the road scheme should not go ahead in... Read more

  • Andrea Allen

    Objection.

  • Andrew Morgan

    I am very very concerned that such an important archaeological site could be destroyed for the sake of a road. We must look into alternatives such as moving the road a few miles on to less... Read more

  • Andy Beverley

    I am hugely concerned that this scheme, which is touted as being implemented to improve the Stonehenge site, but will actually irreparably damage it. UNESCO's international advisers concur with this... Read more

  • Angela Douglas

    This proposal should not go ahead. This is a sacred landscape unique to our country and should not have the impact and damage to it and it’s archaeology of the proposed plans to this heritage site.... Read more

  • Anna Beria

    - Irreparable damage to the WHS, its archaeology and setting - potential damage to Blick Mead Mesolithic site and its setting - Lack of alternative options in consultation - Loss of the view from... Read more

  • Anne Hollings

    The intended development will harm the site, this is our heritage for future generations. UNESCO representatives have argued against this road; apart from the massive damage there will be increased... Read more

  • Anne Ludlow

    Stonehenge is the single most iconic historical treasure in the British Isles, and should be treated with the utmost care and respect. This does not include desecrating and potentially damaging it... Read more

  • Anne Robinson

    Information was lacking to properly assess the environmental impacts of the scheme. There are likely to be seriously damaging effects on wildlife and the water regime. Local people would suffer noise,... Read more

  • Annie Barlow

    The current plan will cause damage to this world heritage site it's archeology and setting that will not be replaceable. The history of this area is still being explored , and even the advisors from... Read more

  • Bernard Douglas-Wood

    1) Stupid, reckless, wanton and irresponsible planning that will irreparably damage one of, if not the, most important of world heritage sites (and of course not just the stones but the whole of the... Read more

  • Britt

    The damage that has already, and will be done to this sacred monument is scandolous, soon we will have no heritage left to our children. A place of religious and cultural significance must be left in... Read more

  • Claire Conlon

    I have concerns of irreversible damage and disruption to an archaelogoical world heritage site as well as the effect it will have upon wildlife and the noise pollution it will bring. I ask that... Read more

  • Dan Ward

    I strongly object to the plans as they stand because it will have a strong negative impact on the rights of way network in the area. My hobby is exploring our wonderful country travelling only on... Read more

  • Dave King

    I am objecting to the proposed closure of several byways in the area around Stonehenge as this would disrupt the recreational motorcycle use of the rights of way network in that area. Suitable... Read more

  • David Bell

    It is my understanding that the conditions of the original gift of Stonehenge and surrounding land, to the 'People', will be breached, if this proposal goes ahead. Further to this, a site of world... Read more

  • David Bernson

    I wish to register my profound objections to the A303 Stonehenge Expressway. I consider these plans insensitive to the Stonehenge site as a whole environment and potentially destructive to a... Read more

  • David Hollingd

    The whole area is officially either World Heritage status or of significant historical significance, which the scheme will either damage or destroy. It needs to be recognised that Stonehenge is one... Read more

  • David R Matthews

    Family members near the site have long asked for my support. The news that disturbance is already created by tunneling was the final straw.

  • David Texidor

    Hello, thank you for taking an interest in my concerns. With many in the public and relevant experts, I have concerns over the current plan with regards to: UNESCO's own advisers noting that the... Read more

  • David Trethewey

    I believe that a short tunnel at Stonehenge including cuttings and a dual carriageway within the World Heritage Site would cause severe damage to the Stonehenge landscape, which is recognised by... Read more

  • Denis Rumbold

    Construction of this road would result in irreparable damage to this World Heritage Site. There is still an unknown amount to learn about its archaeology and setting. This site is described by... Read more