Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.
-
That the intended work/ construction will cause damage to the pre existing environment and this is supported by UNESCO advisors.
An alternative solution must be found so as not to cause religious...
Read more
-
I am deeply concerned that advice from UNESCO is being ignored. The archaeological treasures at Stonehenge extend far beyond the stones themselves. It is a travesty to dig in this area and we have...
Read more
-
I believe the proposed tunnel and fly-over will not only damage the ancient archaeology of Blick Mead, but will ensure the site can never be excavated, thus losing any insight of those who dwelt there...
Read more
-
I object to the incursions of the roads that are proposed for this site of international significance.
To build roads within the curtilage of such an important monument would be problem enough but...
Read more
-
• Irreparable damage to the WHS, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’
• UNESCO’s international advisers say the scheme should not go ahead in its...
Read more
-
Irreparable damage to the WHS, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’
UNESCO’s international advisers say the scheme should not go ahead in its present...
Read more
-
The proposed A303 road scheme will cause irreversible damage to the archaeology and wider setting of the World Heritage Site (WHS). UNESCO, which has described the landscape as without parallel, and a...
Read more
-
This work will cause irreparable damage to the UNESCO World Heritage Site. This in itself should be enough to stop proceedings.
-
I write as a visitor to, and a traveller past, the Stonehenge World Heritage Site, which I have known for over sixty years.
I oppose the scheme in its present form on the following grounds:
1. ...
Read more
-
I am representing myself as a cyclist. I have already made the comment about restricting motorised traffiic access to the proposed cycle paths which I believe has been addressed. As many cyclists...
Read more
-
It is disgraceful that the concerns raised to date have been ignored and the option of building a longer tunnel to prevent damage to the WHS has not been chosen. This will cause irreparable damage to...
Read more
-
I am the Chair of the Wilts and Swindon Countryside Access Forum but writing as an individual. In the past 10 years I have staffed 38 x DMMO and diversions for MOD and led a team of volunteers to...
Read more
-
Stone Henge is one of the most important sites on our island. This tunnel jepardises the site and it's surrounding areas. Wildlife will also be unneccesarily impacted. UNESCO have also expressed...
Read more
-
Stonehenge should be left alone and protected for centuries to come (:
-
UNESCO views the archaeology in this area as 'a landscape without parallel' and their advisors say the scheme should not go ahead in its present form - with which I wholly agree. The archaeology is...
Read more
-
I object to the desecration of the Stonehenge World Heritage Site that will be an inevitable consequence if the proposed short tunnel though the Stonehenge landscape goes ahead.
This country has the...
Read more
-
I believe that if this horrendous tunnel goes ahead it will cause irreversible damage to this unique and amazing landscape. A landscape that should be treasured and protected. This landscape belongs...
Read more
-
I do nit think that the current scheme should be allowed. It will destroy our heritage.
-
The plan will do irreparable damage to this ancient site and I object strongly
-
It is an historical site which needs to be maintained in its current state especially in view of all the new excavation and discovery throughout the whole area.
The sight of Stonehenge is awesome...
Read more
-
A site of such unique significance cannot be considered purely in the local, regional or even national context. The views of the global archaeological and cultural community must carry great,...
Read more
-
Ensure that the development continues to take account of the impact on local infrastructure
Ensure that the links to local roads, byways and footpaths are maintained and/or enhanced
Ensure that the...
Read more
-
Irreparable damage to the World Heritage Site, its archaeology, and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’.
UNESCO’s international advisers say the scheme should not go...
Read more
-
I object to the A303 Expressway because I believe it will do irreparable and unquantifiable damage to any remaining archaeology.
-
I believe that this would cause damage to the unique World Heritage Site,
its archaeology and setting, especially in the light of UNESCO's report.
What about alternative options which would avoid...
Read more
-
I would like to protest about the intended route that will irreparably damage Stonhenge, which is after all an acknowledged Sacred Site, not just in the UK but worldwide. The route is in my opinion...
Read more
-
With each decade new technologies arise which enable us to discover more about our ancient forebears and their culture. The opportunity to continue to learn from discovered and still to be revealed...
Read more
-
I am totally opposed to this scheme which will cause irreparable damage to this unique World Heritage Site. The tunnel, associated works, construction process and ongoing management will destroy the...
Read more
-
I really do not think that a world heritage site like Stonehenge should be treated like this with no respect. I am a ( animistic ) pagan and this treatment is an affront to my religion. There are also...
Read more
-
Plans for a road tunnel near Stonehenge are "severely flawed" and the "whole project must be re-assessed" a World Heritage Sites advisory body has said.
[Redacted], chair of the Icomos-UK World...
Read more
-
Blick Mead site has already been damaged and things have hardly started. What on earth else is going to be damaged if plans go ahead for the proposed tunnel. It is, in my opinion, a short sighted and...
Read more
-
I feel that the risk of any damage no natter how small is not worth the risk, this place is unique and should not be put in any danger.
This is by far more important than any car or lorry.
This plan...
Read more
-
Stonehenge is a World Heritage Landscape with many upstanding monuments and probably many more underground. Many of these underground monuments have not been fully studied either by excavation or by...
Read more
-
I strongly object to the development of the A303 tunnel under Stonehenge!
Stonehenge is a very sensitive and spiritual place. It's the Heart Chakra of the planet. Tunnelling underneath it would be...
Read more
-
I want to register my brother ojection to the development on the following grounds:
I am a pagan and this site has especial spiritual significance for me. I am concerned that the development is going...
Read more
-
I am concerned about likely damage to the archaeology and setting of the World Heritage Site, especially as UNESCO advisers advise against the present scheme.
I am particularly concerned about...
Read more
-
Concerns about wildlife in surrounding area and damage to a world heritage neolithic site.
-
I want to object to the A303 development because it will damage the Stone Henge World Heritage Site
-
I am at a loss as why you would want to go ahead with this insensitive, ill-concieved road scheme. Our National Heritage sites should be protected. These thoughtless and ill-concieved schemes such as...
Read more
-
I am objecting to the proposed plan because I have concerns over the fact there could be damage caused by construction work to Blick Mead Mesolithic site and its setting. Also there is the loss of...
Read more
-
This scheme is indicative of transport infrastructure projects in England in that it is poorly thought out, value engineered to death and:
Puts the car user above all forms of transport
Puts roads...
Read more
-
I am simply appalled to find that you risk such potential damage of this UNESCO World Heritage site.
Once done, the potential for irreparable damage to the substrata of one of our country's most...
Read more
-
World bodies say how can you damage a World Heritage Site.
This monument is for the world to see not an irritation to drivers!
Lack of alternative options in consultation that would not damage the...
Read more
-
Irreparable damage to the World Heritage Site, which UNESCO describes as 'a landscape without parallel’.
UNESCO’s international advisers say the scheme should not go ahead in its present form.
A...
Read more
-
1. Stonehenge is a world heritage site and unique. The whole area is very rich archaeologically speaking. It needs to be protected at all costs
2. It is a big tourist attraction and anything that...
Read more
-
Among a number of other considerations, the habitat of the Stone Curlew and the Great Bustard risks being disturbed by the project - and they are already rare species. This concerns me greatly. Also,...
Read more
-
Gason Lane:
I live on Gason Lane - a narrow single track lane with minimal passing spaces, currently connected to A303 and used as a rat run when traffic is heavy with a gridlock resulting and no...
Read more
-
Irreparable damage to the WHS, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’.
UNESCO’s international advisers say the scheme should not go ahead in its present...
Read more
-
I am currently short of time, so in a nutshell: building a road like this at a World Heritage Site must not be done. It is a World Heritage Site - people all around the world have heard of, are...
Read more
-
I object to A303 Stonehenge Expressway because it will cause irreparable damage to the world heritage site, archeology and setting. It is far older and more valuable than all of us. Any damage is...
Read more