Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.
-
I have grave concerns about the proposal to build an expressway, A303.
This is an UNESCO World Heritage site and should be treated accordingly. UNESCO Adviers do not approve of this proposal.
I...
Read more
-
I am deeply concerned that despite many objections from parties as diverse as Archeologists, Naturalists, Druids and even UNESCO, this plan is apparently being bulldozed through.
It is remarkable -...
Read more
-
I was brought up in Stratford sub Castle, Salisbury and spent much time at Stonehenge. It is our history. Once it has gone, it will never come back. I am in complete opposition to the proposal.
-
To ensure that the needs of non-motorised users (NMUs) are considered both on the route of the A303 and the wider area, and appropriate measures implemented in accordance with HE Cycling Strategy and...
Read more
-
Apart from the obvious fact that stone henge is a national monument which also is held sacred by certain persons in their religious beliefs , and the fact i enjoy driving the 303 i wish to point out...
Read more
-
The proposed scheme will undermine a unique world heritage site whilst increasing traffic, which completely contradicts the UK'S commitments to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. I regularly drive along...
Read more
-
The consultation is something of a farce. My principal interest is the impact the building of the proposed road works and the changes in the landscape after completion will have on the bird life in...
Read more
-
I am primarily concerned by the UNESCO objection to this development. This part of Wiltshire is a designated World Heritage Site for specific reasons and any move which endangers that designation...
Read more
-
I wish to object to the current plans for the Stonehenge site.
The site, of outstanding international importance, is huge. It is not conceivable that we have discovered and identified all there is to...
Read more
-
I hereby assign myself as an Interested Party and that I am opposed to anything happening to this historical and precious site
-
I am concerned about the damage to the archaeology of the wider Stonehenge landscape, including the mesolithic site of Blick Mead. I am concerned that the scheme has been condemned by UNESCO, and how...
Read more
-
As a native of Salisbury Plain (born and lived till 18 in Tilshead) and as a specialist in global megalithic architecture, I object to the massive disruption to the ancient and globally-important...
Read more
-
Stonehenge (and Avebury) is an iconic feature in the British landscape, which I have enjoyed for the past 35years, while driving past it or visiting the site with friends and family.
Altering the...
Read more
-
The significant possibility of further damage to Blick mead preliminary work has already damaged site.
damage to wide area including archaeology and the setting.
I have traveled passed Stonehenge...
Read more
-
I am concerned that there will be irreparable damage to the WHS, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’.
Also, UNESCO’s international advisers say the...
Read more
-
People tend to see Stonehenge as just the obvious megaliths, but it is part of a much wider neolithic landscape, which we are just starting to explore and understand, and which could be irreparably...
Read more
-
My representation regards the provisions being made under this road scheme for instances where the act of the construction of this road will result in the removal of an individual's ability to...
Read more
-
I strongly object to any work or disturbance to the sacred Stonehenge monument and surrounding site, I strongly object to the tunnel plans, I would urge the government to read _ think these terrible...
Read more
-
It will cause irreparable damage to the World Heritage site, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’.
It will also cause disturbance of rare bird species,...
Read more
-
I object to the proposed A303 expressway past Stonehenge world heritage site, I myself and my children have visited stonehenge many times over the last 40 years and feel that irreparable damage will...
Read more
-
To destroy any part of this unique site would be the act of Philistines and barbarians. We would be worse than those destroying statues and buildings in Syria and the Middle East. Please consider our...
Read more
-
It will cause irreparable damage to the World Heritage site, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’.
UNESCO’s international advisers say the scheme should...
Read more
-
The landscape surrounding Stonehenge is of supreme importance Historically, Archeologically, Educationally and as a Social amenity. To destroy that landscape irreparably by driving a road through it,...
Read more
-
This site is of enormous historical importance. It has already been damaged during preliminary work and if this plan goes forward it is likely to cause far more damage.
Any proposed development must...
Read more
-
It will destroy the sacred heritage of this site.