Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.
-
The noise generated by overhead planes is directly impacting my families health. My wife and I are regularly woken up with low flying and extremely loud planes. Once woken up it is impossible to...
Read more
-
As a resident of Penshurst I am registering to express my dismay at the proposal that Gatwick want to use the emergency runway as a second runway.
-
We are under the existing flight path and are concerned about the impact an additional runway will have on the number of planes passing over us. Also, at a time where we should be reducing carbon...
Read more
-
I am extremely concerned about night flights and would like them banned between the hours of midnight and 7am. Additionally my main other concern is the much greater impact from the additional 20 to...
Read more
-
I cannot put this better than Plane Wrong's summary - Noise - Expansion of Gatwick would significantly increase aircraft noise both for those living near the airport and for those further away under...
Read more
-
There is nothing beautiful about living in an area of outstanding natural beauty which is plagued by non-stop aircraft noise both day and night. This is exactly how it is, quite often, at busy times...
Read more
-
I am writing to you with regards to Gatwick's plans to make their emergency runway into a second runway. In my area [REDACTED] we live near Hever Castle, and we already have aeroplane noises every 3-5...
Read more
-
We have lived in Four Elms for over 30 years. The levels of noise and air pollution directly attributable to Gatwick air traffic flows has steadily increased in our area, especially in the last 10...
Read more
-
The proposed expansion of Gatwick Airport is not acceptable for the following reasons: 1. The surrounding area and infrastructure is not sufficient to accommodate the number of people, cars etc...
Read more
-
We already have too many flights some of which are below 4,000 feet over Speldhurst. South London is already well serviced by airports and continual expansion flies in the face of what the Government...
Read more
-
I accept that the noise from aircraft on the broad swath approach as it is at present, whilst severe, is tolerable. Any increase in noise frequency or volume would not be tolerable.
-
I have serious concerns regarding the increase in noise, pollution and safety if the proposed expansion is allowed to proceed. Additionaly I do not believe that the road, rail or airport terminal...
Read more
-
I live under the Gatwick flight path and already suffer from considerable negative impact with existing flight traffic. The proposed new runway will significantly add to my a families suffering,...
Read more
-
A northern runway will blight a beautiful area in Kent and Surrey with aircraft noise and pollution for little gain at a time when the UK should be optimising infrastructure for minimal environmental...
Read more
-
The main issues regarding the addition of a second runway at Gatwick will be; Increased noise from aircraft landing and taking off. Increased road traffic going to and from the airport Environmental...
Read more
-
I live in Penshurst and enjoy the amenity of peaceful country life. Already planes flying overhead in their approach to Gatwick cause noise and disturbance, including at night and in the early...
Read more
-
Increase of noise. We live higher than most under the flight approach which is the majority of the time due to prevailing winds. The whining of the engines is still excessive even when we were told it...
Read more
-
I object to the proposed project. Noise pollution from flights is already a major issue affecting residents in communities across the region and this proposed project goes against government policy to...
Read more
-
We have continuous flight noise day time and night time in school holiday terms Emirate flights with A 380 always too low and noisy
-
Gatwick must not be allowed to build a second runway. They are following a dishonest and underhand process to try to do so. [REDACTED] Arguments against: adverse environmental effect on the area...
Read more
-
Before we moved to Brockham Park 10 years ago we had not realised how badly we would be disturbed by aircraft noise from Gatwick. Sometimes it sounded as if the planes were flying right past our...
Read more
-
Policy has been (deliberately?) misinterpreted by the airport as this is an application for a new runway which does not comply with government policy. Government Aviation Strategy allows one for one...
Read more
-
I wish to register my opposition to the proposed 'second runway' at Gatwick. There are several reasons:- - the noise issues and their effects on the local communities have not been addressed. I would...
Read more
-
Environmental Impact: The expansion of an airport typically leads to an increase in air traffic, resulting in greater carbon emissions and pollution. This can have a detrimental effect on the local...
Read more
-
Area of outstanding natural beauty. Open up Manston where fewer residential areas and next to the sea. Makes more sense
-
Given the improved train infrastructure in the country under way do we really need more flights. The vast majority of Gatwick flights are short haul and I see no justification for increasing their...
Read more
-
The increased noise and traffic within rural areas and areas of natural beauty will be detrimental to the lived environment.
-
Expansion of Gatwick would significantly increase aircraft noise for us as the planes are already flying further north from their flight paths on Departure Routes 3 and 4. Think about the effect of...
Read more
-
The airport expansion isn’t acceptable to this area. We have noise late and early and the village is used as a ‘rat run’ for staff and travellers alike. We have many cars parking here rather than pay...
Read more
-
Environmental Impact on the surrounding areas including increased pollution due to construction activities and increased air traffic. Noise Pollution: Additional runways mean more flights, which in...
Read more
-
The proposal to make the second runway wider can only be good for the area, bringing in extra jobs and opportunities for businesses.
-
We live under the flight path into Gatwick. The planes are around 2-2500 feet above us. We already incur significant noise disturbances from planes landing. This includes the very late and also very...
Read more
-
Increased air traffic around Gatwick, with Air Traffic Control already at capacity. Increased flow rate at Gatwick leading to an increase in passenger numbers and a subsequent increase in road traffic...
Read more
-
I strongly oppose the Gatwick expansion. The infrastructure won’t cope (it can’t at the moment). The M25 & M23 are always having traffic jams. Our local schools, doctors & hospital are at full...
Read more
-
Opening a second runway at Gatwick would hugely increase the already intolerable flight noise over the local area with even more flights. As a country supposedly trying to lead the way and reduce...
Read more
-
Crowborough is an elevated position and East Sussex's 2nd highest point at 780 feet above sea level. It already has significant air traffic, many using it as a navigation and turning point. I am...
Read more
-
I wish to object to the expansion of Gatwick Airport with the proposition to fully utilise the Northern Runway. I live approximately 10 miles from Gatwick Airport in an area of Outstanding Natural...
Read more
-
Gatwick Airport’s expansion would have an extremely detrimental impact on the environment together with significant impact on all the communities, the increased impact on residents living under the...
Read more
-
There is ALREADY regular excessive aircraft noise from Gatwick airport which negatively impacts my family's quality of life - this further expansion plan will lead to this noise becoming significantly...
Read more
-
The extension of the northern runway at Gatwick is a long-overdue decision and would release a lot of pressure on the air traffic management of the airport, allowing it to safely expand and reduce...
Read more
-
Aircraft noise, pollution, frequency of aircraft especially early morning and late night flying, flight path over conservation area, VERY low flying of aircraft so I can read the carriers name! These...
Read more
-
Our house is under the flight path to ( and from) Gatwick and we are concerned that the increased number of flights facilitated by a second runway will have an adverse impact on the quality of our...
Read more
-
Noise Expansion of Gatwick would significantly increase aircraft noise both for those living near the airport and for those further away under flight paths, in particular departure Routes 3 and 4....
Read more
-
I fully support the runway proposal as it will greatly contribute to the economic prosperity of the region & the country. In a very particular way, it can be seen that new routes & greater frequencies...
Read more
-
The impact of noise from Gatwick airport is already very intrusive, and causing my husband and me stress and ill-health. To bring the northern runway into use would very seriously further adversely...
Read more
-
Expansion of Gatwick would significantly increase aircraft noise both for those living near the airport and for those further away under flight paths. Plane Wrong supporters are affected by Departure...
Read more
-
I write these comments in my capacity as Member of Parliament for Tonbridge and Malling. In brief, Gatwick Airport have submitted plans which would bring their northern runway into use. This is, in...
Read more
-
I am strongly opposed to expansion at Gatwick given the effect it would have on my village and surrounding area of oustanding natural beauty . I feel that expansion would be environmentally damaging...
Read more
-
I object. Climate change requires reduction in air travel. I am concerned regarding risk of accidents with higher volumes. There is already a noticeable increase in number of aircraft. They continue...
Read more
-
Once standby runway is used for routine flights regulatory requirements will probably mean another safety runway will have to be built.Carbon neutral by 2030 ,can I see details of the new non...
Read more