Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.
-
The Noise Preferential Route 4 passes very close to the Surrey Hills AONB which at a height of 750 feet is much closer to the aircraft than surrounding areas. The persistent noise and pollution from...
Read more
-
The roads around Gatwick airport are already extremely busy and expansion of the airport will only exacerbate this problem. Expansion will also make it necessary for more houses to be built in an area...
Read more
-
This relevant representation is being submitted by Tandridge District Council (TDC) in its role as a Host Authority for the Gatwick Northern Runway (NRP) Project Development Consent Order (DCO). Due...
Read more
-
I object to the expansion of Gatwick airport on environmental grounds . As a country we are supposed to be aiming for net zero carbon emissions. Adding an extra runway will put even more carbon in the...
Read more
-
Before any expansion of Gatwick Airport is even considered there needs to be several changes to the way aircraft are always flown down the same corridors when approaching to land. This has been a long...
Read more
-
My village lies in the Weald of Kent - an AONB & one which needs to be preserved for all future generations to enjoy. We already have our lives blighted by increasingly large aircraft flying low over...
Read more
-
Concerned about permanent rights to Church meadow. Concerned about increased traffic Concerned about increased air pollution and noise pollution from more aircraft.
-
Low flying flights to and from Gatwick are already causing significant noise in the area. On some days a steady stream of flights 30s apart can run from dawn till dusk. I do not support this expansion...
Read more
-
I support the project to use the North runway, it will support local jobs and the local economy.
-
Transport for the South East (TfSE) is a sub-national transport body (STB) that represents sixteen local transport authorities. These are Brighton and Hove, East Sussex, Hampshire, Kent, Medway,...
Read more
-
Thank you for your consultation regarding the above development. The UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) welcomes the opportunity to comment on your proposals at this stage of the project. Please note...
Read more
-
I don't think the second track is useful because: Traffic in the area is already congested, The highway is not lit, Because the airport charges prohibitive parking fees, many travellers park in the...
Read more
-
I and other members have been asked to support Hever Castle in opposing the second runway at Gatwick. I agree with the castle’s reasons for opposing as this is an area of outstanding beauty and a...
Read more
-
This proposal would affect my wellbeing due to already being on the Gatwick flight path.
-
There are already frequent noisy and low flying aircraft. To add another runway and allow more air traffic will only compound this already existing and stressful problem whilst also affecting the air...
Read more
-
Gatwick has not been a good neighbour as can be seen by the recent judicial review, it's very poor and cynical in collecting data to support its business. My objections are as follows: 1) Gatwick has...
Read more
-
There are fundamental flaws with this project and the premis of using the standby runway. Firstly, an increase in passenger numbers to the levels expected cannot be accommodated within the current...
Read more
-
I disagree with the proposed expansion of Gatwick airport on the grounds that it is unjustified by their often fallacious arguments, takes insufficient consideration of the environmental damage this...
Read more
-
GO for it!
-
I fully support the additional runway to Gatwick. It is key vital infrastructure that is needed as a viable alternative to Heathrow and other airports that support travel around London. This will...
Read more
-
Concerned about increased noise from aircraft, increased pollution and damage to road infrastructure from the increase in traffic
-
It is not sustainable to increase traffic around an already congested Gatwick. Air pollution will increase and damage people’s health. This would be against the government’s pledges to decrease global...
Read more
-
Even now, without the additional runway increasing capacity, the noise from planes flying through the night is causing altered sleep patterns which have a detrimental effect on health and well-being....
Read more
-
Expansion of Gatwick Airport will result in increased noise, air pollution, traffic congestion and diminished quality of life for local residents.
-
Any expansion of capacity at Gatwick should be subject to a ban on all arrivals (except if the result of delays) and take offs between 23.00 and 06.00 (similar to the quiet periods that apply at...
Read more
-
I oppose this Gatwick Airport application for a northern runway because it is a new runway – Policy has been misinterpreted by the applicant as this is an application for a new runway and as such does...
Read more
-
Concerns over the environmental impact of more flights; increased road congestion, air and noise pollution
-
Air pollution - as you can appreciate we have a problem with air pollution from our planes flying overhead so hundreds more coming over our local towns and villages will add to more pollution. ULEZ...
Read more
-
Increased air traffic and noise over our village. Increased traffic on roads in the area. More pollution from both. More pressure on existing train routes passing through gatwick More to be provided…
-
Hi, regarding a planned extension of Gatwick. The tranquility and peaceful essence of the countryside I live in, is already degraded by flight paths overhead. Locally national treasure Hever castle...
Read more
-
Firstly the impact on the environment. We should be looking at ways to reduce pollution not proposing to increase the volume by another runway at Gatwick. Just a small example during the summer months...
Read more
-
Hi Please read my comments below, I am opposed to the new runway at Gatwick. I oppose this Gatwick Airport application for a northern runway because it is a new runway – • Policy has been...
Read more
-
Greatly INCREASED NOISE which is inevitable if this Plan goes ahead. We live in an area under the current swathe of incoming traffic where arriving aeroplanes (unnecessarily) descend to between 4500...
Read more
-
This change will massively benefit people living near the airport and those that use it, as planes will be able to arrive & depart more efficiently.
-
I oppose this Gatwick Airport application for a northern runway because it is a new runway – Policy has been misinterpreted by the applicant as this is an application for a new runway and as such does...
Read more
-
I oppose the expansion and additional runway at Gatwick Airport. I oppose for Climate Change reasons I oppose for Global Warming reasons I oppose for additional noise, surface and air pollution...
Read more
-
There is too much noise pollution from the aircraft particularly in the summer when we are outside in the garden or trying to sleep at night with the windows open. I think there is already too much...
Read more
-
These are comments already posted however I reiterate them as a local resident: noise pollution, infrastructure burden and congestion around the airport as well as its impact on the environment and...
Read more
-
I run a design and marketing agency based in Tunbridge Wells we struggle to find staff. On some nights from 2 am till 4 am noisy old planes join the decent path over Tunbridge wells turning sharply...
Read more
-
There is still a material unused capacity on the existing runway - there is therefore no need for this 2nd runway - just make better use of the existing one before trying to take economical advantage...
Read more
-
I am a regular user of Gatwick and I fully support this project, we need to increase capacity for London to grow, get rid of the anti growth coalition
-
Flight movement increases, Flightpath impact on surrounding areas, both issues noise/pollution/ etc. Is there an impact/link to the future of the nearby Redhill Aerodrome? Passenger benefit v....
Read more
-
I disagree with the expansion plans. The airport was already refused permission for a second runway by the government, this is a second runway by stealth. Since the airport has changed there flight...
Read more
-
This application does not comply with the Airports National Policy Statement requiring airports (other than Heathrow) to demonstrate sufficient need to justify their expansion proposals, additional to...
Read more
-
Concern about noise and pollution. As early as 5 am it’s still noisy when I’m trying to sleep.
-
I would just like to say I think it would be a great addition to the area for jobs ect and as for noise and pollution things are getting better and better in that department just to many busy body's...
Read more
-
As an Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty we are already blighted by the noise and pollutants generated by the flights in and out of Gatwick, which I understand is not subject to any restriction in the...
Read more
-
I believe there is an important need to strengthen UK infrastructure resilience. A second runway is important to achieve this, permitting more flexible use of the airport and protecting against...
Read more
-
I feel that building a second runway would impact on the surrounding environment. Gatwick have been using their emergency runway regularly causing aircraft to thunder over the top of my home with...
Read more
-
During the pandemic the Gatwick approach route has quietly changed to fly over an area of Natural Outstanding Beauty which has affected the sights of wildlife and birds (I live in West Hoathly). I do...
Read more