Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.
-
I oppose the expansion of Gatwick airport (two runways) because of it's contribution to climate change and local air/noise pollution As well as this transport links aren't sufficient, roads are...
Read more
-
The developments at Gatwick Airport change of use of runways and associated developments and land take are unwanted and unnecessary. New developments are only intended to increase local air travel and...
Read more
-
The impact on my daily life is noise pollution with flights over our home from 0515 to 2320 regularly. Additional flights outside of these times also cause night time disturbance. Sleep quality...
Read more
-
Increase in noise and disturbance - with open windows yesterday, as the noise of one plane went into the distance, there was barely a minute before the sound of the next one approaching. I appreciate...
Read more
-
The impact of any expansion to Gatwick Airport will be TERRIBLE for local residents, We have too much plane noise - including early mornings - already and the impact of a major increase in air traffic...
Read more
-
The noise level is already unacceptable - I am unable to carry out a conversation outside when a plane is taking off in an easterly direction. Night flights have increased and continue throughout the...
Read more
-
Hi, This new runway will have a significant negative impact on the environment primarily due to increased carbon emissions and increased noise with far less respite for the residents under or close to...
Read more
-
I oppose the use of the emergency runway for other than an emergency due to the increase in aircraft noise, impact on climate change, impact on general wellbeing through increase in aircraft...
Read more
-
I live at (REDACTED) , and I am the County Councillor for Dorking Rural Division in Surrey. 90 million passengers a year, will increase the frequency of planes flying out of Gatwick without noise...
Read more
-
The impact on AONBs and National Parks, which should be protected from being overflown Impact on Hever Castle as a heritage visitor attraction Low unemployment means there will not be sufficient...
Read more
-
I oppose 2nd Runway in Gatwick as i believe that this will lead to increase of aircraft noise, which already has an adverse impact on our family's well-being. I am also concerned about decline of air...
Read more
-
There will be more air pollution as I live about 3 miles from proposed runway. It will affect my health (redacted).
-
A second runway for Gatwick Airport would be a disaster for our environment. At a time when the entire world is trying to reduce pollution and carbon emissions, to encourage more aircraft travel (just...
Read more
-
By Gatwick's admission, a second runway will increase the number of flights to and from Gatwick Airport. However, ANY airport expansion is not consistent with addressing climate change (which is...
Read more
-
I support Gatwick expansion. The benefits outweigh the impact.
-
The proposed development and expansion at Gatwick is inappropriate and damaging to the surrounding rural arras and housing areas.
-
The impact on the environment with the additional flights out ways creating more jobs. Effecting areas that have not been affected previously and some areas continuous noise. I moved to Dormansland...
Read more
-
My main concern is the impact on climate change. The impact of air travel on climate change is being underestimated. We should be reducing aviation movements, not increasing them. There will be...
Read more
-
Completely opposed to the expansion of Gatwick . We live to the east of Gatwick and are on the. Tail end of the flight path. With planes overhead So 1. Excessive additional plane noise 2. Large...
Read more
-
I am against the second runway the main reasons as follows...increase in aircraft noise, impact on climate change, devalue my property and wellbeing through increase in aircraft movements, lack of...
Read more
-
I am opposed to any form of aviation expansion. Airspace is already overcrowded. Noise and emissions are damaging to health and the environment.
-
Aircraft flying directly overhead wake me up before 07.00 - it destroys my sleep and makes me tired for the rest of the day. It is impacting on my mental health! This will only make matters worse.
-
I oppose Gatwick’s plans for the following reasons increase in aircraft noise, impact on climate change, devalue my home and wellbeing through increase in aircraft movements, lack of surface transport...
Read more
-
I have a business which is already affected by the noise of planes. I definitely don't want more. It is also madness when all we hear about is some kind of climate breakdown that we are just ignoring...
Read more
-
Concerned about increased noise and pollution over our home. Flight paths were in the past spread over a larger area but are now concentrated over our village/ my home. A second runway will make...
Read more
-
Nescot works closely with Gatwick Airport Limited in respect of the development of skills, training and associated innovation. Nescot recognises and values GAL's role as a major employer and business...
Read more
-
Environmental Impact. Economic Impact. Noise and Flight paths.
-
In short, there are three reasons why the proposal to use the emergency runway as a normal runway is a bad idea: - the local transport infrastructure is already heavily loaded, and will not be able to...
Read more
-
I am registering to make comments about this proposal because I am against the expansion of Gatwick airport beyond its current capacity for a number of reasons which I will detail later.
-
I am deeply concerned about the massive environmental impact a second runway at Gatwick airport would make. I cannot comprehend why this is being even considered when we are in a Climate crisis here...
Read more
-
I am concerned already as to the amount of planes flying until early hours in the morning. Larger planes disturbing the peace. We can't enjoy our countryside home or have a peaceful evening. The air...
Read more
-
very simple really, more planes equals more noise, more pollution, more traffic and more profits for Gatwick and their foreign owners, but basically it is very very simple, more planes = more noise....
Read more
-
Current flight volumes create extended sound pollution for large parts of the day, leading to disrupted sleep. Environmental impact is not conducive to longterm net zero objective. In light of the...
Read more
-
Object due to lack of local infrastructure, increased local noise and pollution, and large scale development on edge of Green Belt land in East Surrey.
-
Objections to Gatwick expansion: - increase in noise interference - night flights - Gatwick's unsuitable location in SE - inadequate transport infrastructure for passenger numbers - stress on water...
Read more
-
There was a bond offered to residents of Radford Road which I believe is still in force and was extended. This bond refers to "additional" runway and "second runway", in which case, I believe that...
Read more
-
I cannot see any useful information about flightpaths once the new runway comes in to use. There is plenty of information about the flightpaths that follow straight off either end of the runways but...
Read more
-
Noise of aircraft increasing Climate and environment Health and well being Loss of value to my home Mis led re runway 2
-
I am currently caused disruption by aircraft deviating from Gatwick flight path. I object to the expansion of Gatwick Airport. They state "one step closer to a brighter future - for everyone" It...
Read more
-
Environmental eg air pollution, strain of infrastructure. Noise
-
I and those living in this community are fundamentally opposed to this reckless damaging enterprise which will turn an AONB into a noise-ghetto and cultural desert if it is allowed to proceed. I will...
Read more
-
I am looking at the effect on my business by this change. I am not against.
-
The impact of expansion of Gatwick airport At present we are under the flight path of incoming flights to Gatwick at selected times and the increasing number of flights is having a negative impact on...
Read more
-
Aircraft noise Environment Health and well being Mis led re 2nd runway Object re threat to areas of natural Beaty climate change impact on residents and community and infrastructure I am concerned...
Read more
-
More flights will have an adverse effect on air pollution and noise pollution. There will be more traffic on the local minor roads as well as main roads. More jobs mean more houses for workers in an...
Read more
-
There is a very real threat from climate extremes exacerbated by the increase in air traffic. The expansion of airports is a sign that the economy is seen to be more important than this threat. I am...
Read more
-
We do not need even more aircraft over the quiet Sussex countryside. Its already very busy day and night..also if we are to get to net zero we need less aircraft not more I oppose this Gatwick Airport...
Read more
-
I belive the expansion of Gatwick Airport is needed and will significantly benefit the local economy. However, I would like to better understand how the impact of emissions would be mitigated during...
Read more
-
Aircraft noise is already incredibly intrusive, having a major impact on time spent outside. Sometimes planes go over, low, every 4-5 minutes, making simply sitting in the garden unbearable. The...
Read more
-
I object on the grounds of poor air quality and noise. These planes are flying too low and the noise is unbearable. What happen to climate change