Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.
-
I have lived in the village of Felbridge from the 1990's. The village was never on the flightpath until recently. When Gatwick was exploring various flightpaths tests over the past 5-6 years, the...
Read more
-
The second run way at Gatwick will cause more traffic , the roads are already congested with many delays reported daily. Air pollution and noise will increase this is not good for the environment or...
Read more
-
Definitely NO to a 2nd runway. Planes from Gatwick, Heathrow and Redhill fly LOW and Loud over my home. Pollution Noise included, plus the danger is intolerable.
-
The Government asked airports to look at existing infrastructure to expand capacity. Relocating the emergency runway at Gatwick 12 meters to the North is not existing infrastructure, it is a new and...
Read more
-
I am very concerned about the increase of noise pollution due new flight path and increase frequency.
-
My main concern is increased aircraft noise and air pollution.
-
I am very concerned about the likely significant increase in aircraft noise, negative impact on our climate and reduction in air quality, the likely subsequent devaluation of my property and the...
Read more
-
Completely against this, they can’t even get flight out on time as it is. Traffic is mad enough, and the train’s aren’t reliable enough for people to trust them in order not to travel by car, we don’t...
Read more
-
Reasons not to build a second runway. 1.Pollution 2. More traffic more pollution. 3. Noise. 4.Not needed ,use other local airports.
-
Increased noise Increased pollution and effects on climate change. Devaluation in property prices. Increased traffic in the area adding again to pollution.
-
Expansion at Gatwick cannot be sustainable development, air travel is already imposing unsustainable burdens (see CAGNE evidence) locally and more widely. “Green” aviation fuel is, and will remain, a...
Read more
-
I register my opposition to Gatwick extension/second runway on environmental grounds
-
The noise of a second runway would be terrible for us who live nearby. Also it would ruin the beautiful countryside we have and love around Gatwick.
-
I wish to object to the proposal for a second runway at Gatwick. We are already adversely impacted by aircraft noise and given the climate challenges being faced there is no justification for...
Read more
-
We are in a Climate and Ecological Emergency. We have been advised by the UN, the government's Climate Change Committee and many well respected scientific bodies that it is essential that we...
Read more
-
I cannot believe that at a time of environmental crisis any sane person would even consider a second runway. If this is approved I suspect many people will stop bothering to “ be green” as clearly the...
Read more
-
I have lived in my house for over 50 years, in this time the noise pollution from Gatwick has increased vastly. My wife and I were interviewed in our garden by a BBC crew a couple of years ago but...
Read more
-
Strongly oppose on serious issues on increased noise, infrastructure and Environmental grounds.
-
Most importantly, increased flying will exacerbate Global Warming. Road, rail and local services inadequate. Adverse effect on living conditions and property prices over large area while any Crawley...
Read more
-
The existing road, rail & public transport infrastructures are not sufficient to cope with the proposed increase in passenger numbers. There is a lack of affordable houses or amenities for the...
Read more
-
Against New Northern Runway at Gatwick Airport
-
Another runway would cause additional noise and pollution to the area
-
I oppose a second runway at Gatwick because of: increase in aircraft noise impact on climate change devaluing of homes affecting our well-being through increase in aircraft movements lack of surface...
Read more
-
The air traffic from Gatwick has been making summers a misery for me for years. The noise from planes, especially at night and early morning is horrendous and keeps me from sleeping all summer long....
Read more
-
Flights should be reduced for environmental reasons not increased. It will also be detrimental for people living in the area: increase in aircraft noise and all the accompanying pollution.
-
I am totally against this expansion and any expansion to increase the number of flights into and from Gatwick. This is for climate reasons. We need to be reducing the number of flights not increasing...
Read more
-
I oppose this project to create a new second runway on multiple grounds: 1. There is only one runway currently this is an attempt to get a new second runway via the back door 2. Doubling the number of...
Read more
-
I'm 2miles off the flight path and have noticed a massive increase in flight movement with it's associated noise and air pollution. There has also been an increase in parking and traffic problems. All...
Read more
-
Live under the flightpaths, Route 3 and 4. Suffer day to day noise due to operations at the Airport. Concerns about more noise during the day. Concerns about potential for more night flights and...
Read more
-
To bring the second runway at Gatwick into mainstream use would be a significant mistake, because of the following impacts: - It would have a considerably negative impact on progress towards net zero...
Read more
-
Using the emergency northern runway as a regular runway will increase its use significantly. The approach and departure from this runway will obviously be further north and will depart after takeoff...
Read more
-
We are concerned about the amount of increased noise pollution, both air and traffic, that the extra runway will cause. We are also concerned about the impact on the local wildlife and the natural...
Read more
-
Having lived in Dorking for 45 years I have seen a manifold increase in air traffic as well re-routing of flight paths from both Heathrow and Gatwick. At times, flights are barely at 1 minute...
Read more
-
I oppose the project because of the adverse impact it will have on residents, particularly in West Sussex and Surrey. The negatives are many and include the major increase in aircraft movements and...
Read more
-
No issue - flight path does not effect East Grinstead. Heathrow cause more noise. Local area will benefit from skilled work creation.
-
Rural Roads are already under pressure and it will become worse from Gatwick Airport New Northern Runway which proposes doubling the amount of passenger traffic yearly from 45 million to 90 million....
Read more
-
The vast increase in the number of flights will have a catastrophic impact on the local area in terms of noise pollution and environmental pollution. No amount of 'measures' by the airport can...
Read more
-
I object to the proposals because of the likely detrimental impact on carbon dioxide emissions, increase in local noise levels and health problems, and the increased strain on local and regional...
Read more
-
I do not want Gatwick to expand. I believe it will create greater pollution including poorer air quality and greatly increased traffic on already congested local roads. I believe we have a moral...
Read more
-
I am extremely concerned about the impact of additional traffic on and around the roads that we live which already have high levels of traffic to and from Gatwick Airport. The roads do not have the...
Read more
-
Why are Gatwick looking to expand the airport when we are being told we need less travel not more to meet climate targets. The effects of an extra runway doubles capacity and is not a sustainable...
Read more
-
The government spent a long time carrying out a consultation to decide whether Heathrow or Gatwick should have a second runway. They decided it should be Heathrow. Gatwick are now trying to get a...
Read more
-
Increased noise from the extra flights that the new runway will allow.
-
Gatwick recently leafleted everyone in our road claiming that the proposed development at Gatwick will be good for everyone. This is clearly very far from the truth. Not only is there the increase in...
Read more
-
Increased flights goes against net zero commitments by the Govt. The developers are only committing to net zero for emissions within their control. This ignores the emissions of the aircraft. The...
Read more
-
I object. We should not be expanding air travel when we are already seeing the effects of the climate emergency with record world temperatures and record wild fires.
-
Our concerns are we live within the flightpath vicinity of LGW and flights do pass over our house. We are also affected by LHR. We have major concerns about noise
-
Arqiva Limited operate broadcast infrastructure throughout the UK that provides television and DAB radio signal. In order to provide this public service, Arqiva operate a network of broadcast...
Read more
-
I wish to register my opposition to the Northern Runway Project due to increase in noise and frequency of flights which have already gone beyond acceptable levels - especially overnight. Additionally...
Read more
-
Against this expansion as we are already badly effected by low flying flights to Gatwick. Environmental negative impacts are blindingly obvious.