Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.
-
This application will promote further expansion of a highly polluting mode of transport. In view of the governments 'Net Zero' targets and climate change, is it either advisable or acceptable?
-
I live almost directly under the flight path and planes pass over us at about 1 minute intervals about 75% of the time [when the wind blows from the west]. The amount of noise polution is already...
Read more
-
Uk should be committed to making London net zero by 2030 and reducing air pollution. The aviation sector needs to play a part in this and not undermine our efforts to achieve this goal. I fail to see...
Read more
-
I fully support the the Gatwick Northern runway project. It represents an excellent private investment in the local area that will bring substantial benefits likely to greatly exceed costs as assessed...
Read more
-
This project has not considered the impact on communities surrounding the airport for increased traffic , noise pollution, lack of housing and infrastructure, and also to obtain a second runway by...
Read more
-
I oppose the second runway due to the inevitable additional noise and the extra traffic that it will generate in the local area on roads that are often gridlocked
-
Quite happy for the project to go ahead
-
I am a resident, I have lived locally my entire life and I oppose the proposals from Gatwick. The claims about them being a good local employer are laughable. They have stripped that airport and...
Read more
-
I object to the further expansion of Gatwick. Extra noise pollution: already many homes and villages are subjected to loud, regular aircraft passing overhead. This would increase substantially....
Read more
-
I strongly object to this proposed project for the following reasons: NOISE: My property is constantly exposed to aircraft noise flying directly on the overhead flight path above it. These occur...
Read more
-
Carbon emissions Noise pollution Not enough space
-
The current noise levels over(Redacted) from flight arrivals to Gatwick Airport are already at an unacceptable level. These proposals would markedly exacerbate that already unacceptable situation....
Read more
-
Providing new infrastructure to support the further expansion of flight-based travel and tourism seems to deny the existence of climate change, or at least ignore the reasons for it.
-
The noise pollution is already distressing with a majority of planes circling over our property as they stack to land. I can only foresee this issue getting worse should a further runway be approved....
Read more
-
I don’t believe there is a good enough reason to pollute the air further than is happening already. Flight paths and road traffic already impinge on my day to day life, more road traffic in the local...
Read more
-
It is very noisy at night especially and every day in nice weather hard to sit in our garde feels like they are very low when planes coming into land and keeping us awake at night it will be even...
Read more
-
* NOISE I understand the proposals for Gatwick would allow it to grow to the size of Heathrow. The amount of air traffic noise is currently unbearable, particularly in the spring/summer/autumn months,...
Read more
-
Turning the emergency runway into a full time runway will further increase aircraft noise disturbance from its already unacceptable levels. Furthermore, there is a significant safety concern.
-
It goes against all the efforts to reduce green house gasses both directly, aircraft emissions and indirectly by the added vehicular traffic and its associated pollution. It compounds an existing...
Read more
-
I strongly oppose the expansion of Gatwick. It is an environmental disaster to increase air traffic in terms of the contribution to global heating which is now reaching crisis points. It will increase...
Read more
-
I support the development of the northern runway at Gatwick provided that, if it goes ahead, it will eliminate the need for a new runway at Heathrow. This is on the assumption that the cost of the...
Read more
-
I oppose this Gatwick Airport application for a northern runway because it is a new runway – • Policy has been misinterpreted by the applicant as this is an applicant for a new runway which does not...
Read more
-
I am concerned about the increased carbon emissions along with additional noise and pollution which will be suffered by people living nearby. Net 0 requires fewer flights and we should be working on...
Read more
-
the noise is at the top of the objection the smell of aviation fuel is another
-
I object to the increase in noise and air pollution that will be over Horley Reigate & Redhill. It is incompatible with climate change targets & reducing air pollution and CO2 emissions to net zero
-
I support the expansion of Gatwick to have a second runway, I think it would be a positive move for the region
-
Noise, pollution, increased traffic on M25 and M23 are just a few issues. We suffered living under the flight path with low flying aircraft despite living 25 miles away. We ended up having to move....
Read more
-
The SE is already overcrowded. M25 cannot cope now. It will be made worse. There will be an increase in pollution. In a time of severe climate change, this should not be encouraged. I will experience...
Read more
-
We are in a state of climate emergency, expanding aviation capacity and increasingly flights should not even be an option on the table. We should be reducing flights and emissions to help tackle the...
Read more
-
The fuel emissions from the aircraft are already excessive making it unpleasant and unwise to go outside some mornings. The local infrastructure could not support the increase in population and all...
Read more
-
I am opposing the development of the second runway at Gatwick Airport. This will have a huge impact on the Surrey Hills Area of outstanding natural beauty, in respect of noise levels and light...
Read more
-
I am deeply concerned about the carbon footprint of aviation globally. Also the terribly selfish noise pollution that a small number of passengers inflict on local residents.
-
The increased Noise, Nuisance and environmental pollution will directly impact my daily life. The transport infrastructure at Gatwick airport is currently inadequate for the existing number of...
Read more
-
I am interested in local infrastructure (eg roads), and also the impact on local journeys during the construction phase. Noise, smell and light pollution are also important to me.
-
My issues with the second runway are: increased noise and frequency of planes coming over. The impact of pollution with the increase in planes and traffic. An increase in traffic, our village is...
Read more
-
I am very concerned about the increase of carbon emissions, air pollution and noise from an expansion to Gatwick airport.
-
I’m concerned about the pollution in Three Bridges area - we’ve experienced worsening effects in air pollution over the last year ie oily deposits in bird bath water and when the wind is in our...
Read more
-
Until there is zero emission fuel we should be stopping flights, not generating more. This proposal poses an existential threat of ecocide to the UK and the planet. People who put these actions into...
Read more
-
I object strongly to the expansion of Gatwick Airport as suggested in the application on the grounds of detrimental impact on the environment, health, quality of life and amenity value of the area....
Read more
-
I am already affected by aircraft noise,& do not want that increased. It is absolutely necessary to make the planet more green to reduce climate damage by sensible means, that doesn't include...
Read more
-
Our family live under the Gatwick flight path to the east of the airport..our home is already blighted by air traffic which overflies the surrounding AONB. We can not reasonably be asked to endure...
Read more
-
I live under the flight path for Gatwick Airport and hear flights coming into land from early morning to late at night and any increase in noise will adversely affect my sleep and quality of life.
-
I oppose this Gatwick Airport application for a northern runway because it is a new runway – Policy has been misinterpreted by the applicant as this is an applicant for a new runway which does not...
Read more
-
Gatwick expansion will have a severe detrimental effect on it's hinterland To accommodate the additional flights, and consequential passenger numbers, a significant additional infrastructure will be...
Read more
-
- Noise from increased arrivals - Concentration of flight paths - Noise from increased departures - Night flights - Overflight of areas not previously overflown - Lack of/restricted access to Gatwick...
Read more
-
In summary this is a ludicrous scheme for so many reasons. Unnecessary & contrary to the UK green policy, building another active runway will increase noise & pollution in an already busy and...
Read more
-
Before proceeding with the project, please factor in the cost of upgrading local properties with soundproofing/insulation to mitigate the noise from an additional runway. Currently the noise from...
Read more
-
I am concerned about the increase in noise pollution and traffic to the area. This will be even more of a problem during construction.
-
An extra runway at Gatwick Airport will add to climate change and make it more difficult to achieve net zero. It will impact on the health of people below what are now narrow flight paths. Mitigation...
Read more
-
Rejection of additional runway at Gatwick. Damage to the environment, noise and air pollution